Jump to content

Retconning: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 318
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

The 1938 book really is worth getting, if you care about the soap's earliest characters and stories. It often turns up on ebay, and on Amazon. Even better, it's usually a steal, at under $5.00.

 

When characters disappear from soaps without any explanation, I think it's fine to write in a bio, "Ellen Stewart was no longer seen or mentioned in Oakdale after 1996, so we can assume she had left town." But to blatantly create non-existent marriages, deaths, divorces, etc., to justify a character's disappearance is NOT the job of the biographer.  I can see it now, on Wikipedia or Soap Central: "Amelia Earhart was never seen by the public again after her plane disappeared, because after she crashed on a deserted island, Earhart met a fabulously rich recluse who fell in love with her and took her to live with him in his secret, underground city of Eterna. They lived out the rest of their days in Eterna and had five children." ROTF!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I remember back in the 90's Soap Opera Digest even printed a blurb like " In 1979 sleazy Paul brought VD to Genoa City. 

 

Some people also said Chris stood for Christian along with the Christabel error. I remember one board said Snapper was short for Snappington.....LOL

 

 

 

I always thought it was weird how Ellen disappeared. She returned a few years later I think for Nancy's party. Some Y&R fans insist Stuart Brooks is dead, even though he just stopped appearing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nikki did give Paul VD. Doug Davidson told me the reason for the confusion is because Erica Hope (the original Nikki) played Nikki when the VD storyline happened, Melody never knew who gave it to whom, and thus, confusion has ensued for forty years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

In 1996, TPTB dropped Patricia Bruder from contract, for budgetary reasons I suppose. It was ridiculous for them not to give any respect to the character by giving Ellen Stewart a proper send off.  She just ceased to exist. Ellen had been an Oakdale stalwart for 40 years, and Bruder had been a cast member for decades, so it was shameful. Kudos to the succeeding  PTB who later brought her back for Nancy's birthday party, and explained on-air what had happened to the character.

 

The Stuart-Brooks-is-dead myth is another fan-fueled contention.  Like Tommy Horton, Bobby Martin, Jim Craig, Neil Curtis, Don Craig, etc., Stuart simply disappeared from the canvas without any explanation. As time went on, we saw Liz Foster Brooks and the Brooks sisters all returning to Genoa City without Stuart in tow, so it became perfectly plausible to assume that Stuart had passed away. Since nothing was ever mentioned about it on-air, however, it remains speculation drawn by fans trying to fill in the blanks, rather than an established fact.

 

 

 

Of course, Paul was a horn-dog back in those days, and if he had caught something first, I would not have been surprised, but as the story played out on the show, Nikki was indeed the one who infected Paul. And he was not happy. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even the 'best' writers have been guilty of having characters disappear w/o explanation. 

In the case of Stuart Brooks, why not say Stu decided to go on a cruise or visit Lorie or something and then a while later Liz talks to Jill about a divorce. It would only have to be a couple of scenes and Julianna could sell it.

That way,anyone interested would get closure...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my mind, Stuart and Liz divorced after Liz caught Stuart in bed with another, younger woman.  Unfortunately, this same woman was also in bed with Stuart when he died of a heart attack, right in the middle of having sex.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Also, in my mind: Carl Williams is still alive, but Ruth isn't (she died of cancer) and he has yet to regain his memory; and Tommy Horton passed away some time ago, in Hawaii, leaving behind a wife and possibly some children and grandchildren.

 

 

That makes him sound like a porn star.  ("He also delivered pizzas and said he was there to fix the plumbing.")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
    • Wonder if any of the Beyond the Gates people were asked. Admittedly, the show hasn't been on long enough for any of those actors to get much interest.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy