Jump to content

Noah Galvin backlash re Colton Haynes & Coming Out


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The whole interview was an exercise in elitism and self-loathing. Everyone will make him a martyr to free speech because he hates Colton Haynes (and I'm not really a fan of Haynes myself after the blackface stuff, but what a faux-edgy, melodramatic queening out his comments about Haynes were), or because he and Vulture were stupid enough to say things about Bryan Singer that were obviously going to get the lawyers in almost immediately, and they will ignore the rest of his comments, which amounted to generic whining about how fake LA is and reminders that he is not like other gay men, because he "bros out" (unlike those gay men who don't remember to act straight enough around straight men) and he's not like those "fa**ots" who aren't openly gay enough for him to play tonsil hockey with in his dressing room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah, but he called himself a faggot too. And I don't think anything he said indicates he's some proudly masculine gay. He just says behaviors often shift in social settings, which they do.

 

I didn't see anything self-loathing about it. Just blunt, both about himself and the industry. He's clearly proud of who he is. In any event, my full comments are in my status update. Enjoy The Real O'Neals, everyone!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me the entire interview was about the wrong type of gay man and reminders that he isn't one. Add in the commentary about how he is around straight men and it ended up giving me that vibe. But it's not a big deal, and in the end he's going to become a big hero to a lot of people now, so my opinion doesn't really reflect much. I'm glad you enjoy his show, which is all that really counts in the end as we all need something to entertain us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why did he recant his statements about Bryan Singer?! I am so sick of the Hollywood machine protecting this pervert when there have been rumblings of him doing heinous things to young boys. It's like he's untouchable like Woody Allen. 

 

I actually was applauding Noah for calling him out, but I knew in due time someone would force him to recant the statement. Ugh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True but I wish they'd seriously start digging into Singer's tawdry past already. It's been brought up numerous times over the years and haven't gone anywhere. It's clearly obvious that Hollywood has a plethora of sexual offenders that are being protected by the 'machine' and it's time it be addressed. I still hope that regardless of this being recanted, it leads to true victims coming out to speak on the matter. 

 

First it was Elijah Wood speaking out the pervertedness in Hollywood these past few weeks, then Corey Feldman, now Noah Galvin. Where there's smoke....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately a lot of these comments seem to be done as a joke or are turned into something else (as happened with Elijah Wood's comments), which just ends up muddying the water even further. The stories about Singer have been around for ages, but this is the first time I've ever seen them treated in such a bizarrely lighthearted manner. It really should have been edited out of the article from the start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It definitely did. Nothing major, but I clocked the minor changes too. Passions did something similar with its theme in the later years and people thought I was crazy, but the nuances are there if you're paying attention. 
    • What? A nice little mini-marathon of catching up before work.    YES, PLEASE. 
    • I guess they copied literally everything from that C&R scene, the dialogue etc 
    • And even then...you have to wait a couple of weeks to be sure he's actually dead.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Apparently. lol.  Well you know I don't mind standing also with the cheese so  
    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing.  Because my teenage self stayed home often on Saturday nights in the early 90’s I watched Empty Nest just about every night to the bitter end, I do actually always felt a bit sad whenever I see that GG ep knowing that Rita’s character will die with that last line “Good night!” For years I admit I had the Mandela effect that Mulligan was in the episode before I finally caught it again on Lifetime.    And yes lol I don’t care for David Leisure’s character in the episode but somehow was funnier than anything on Empty Nest. Same when Charley crossed over for Dorothy’s Jeopardy dream. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy