Jump to content

Y&R Actress Out


Recommended Posts

  • Members

They really hammered the fact she was dead - Sharon closing her eyes, and then Nick identifying her dead body. They went out of their way to make it brutally final. 

 

I wonder how Sage/Sullivan fell out of Pratt and JFP's good graces, they went out of their way to prop the hell out of her over the past year and a half, to ultimately kill her in a very final and crass way. I wonder if something happened behind the scenes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I laughed at how abrupt her death was, it really was like they wanted or were ordered to kill Sage ASAP.  A few minutes and she's dead with her eyes open, propped up against a rock. They didn't even care to show EMTs or hospital working on her, they just had her DOA at the rock.

 

They tried to force her down viewers throats so much and this is how they kill her? LOL 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who wanted her out, CBS or Sony?

The character, or what she became within months of her arrival, didn't work. I thought she was fine in doses when she came on as a quieter, more mysterious character with dark hair, working with Hartley in that shadowy mansion - that was an idea that was decent. But the character couldn't have gone very far regardless, and pairing her with Nick (and turning her blonde again) was a mistake. It was just another lame triangle. She overstayed her welcome.

 

The brutal way they killed her here actually reminds me a bit of how we hear about the old, old school soaps of the '60s and '70s viciously dispensing with characters at key moments to prolong drama. That's not to say any of this is at that level at all, but there is a basis. Sage was extraneous to the show and could've ended a (lame) story. She had served her function. So they iced her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With the ratings slide, I doubt that either Pratt or JFP have the completely free hand that they once enjoyed.  I actually see Stause as a salve, waiting in the wings, once it became obvious that Sage became a bust of a character.

 

When they paired her with Nick and lightened the hair, most of us knew this was a fatal error.  Sage worked so much better as a peripheral character to the Adam story but heaven forbid Nick (or even Sharon, for that matter) be without a partner for more than two minutes.  Then they floated her between a few degrees away from becoming 'Connie crazy' or this syrupy sweet Stepford Newman wife.  It was a mess!  In a way, it reminds me of what happened to Kelly after Cynthia Watros departed, except Y&R pulled back from making Sage crazy (had she stayed, rest assured, it was coming).

 

This is what happens when you don't plan out a character well enough before forcing her/him into a major story or a visible coupling.  The character flops.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Jean and Shelly created Sage they had the right idea. Jean is good at writing women of mystery it was right up her alley but smarttv left us and Sage started to suck. Oh well Jean should bring her back to GH as a new character 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. Unless they were going to bring MM back as "Adam" and make JT really "Gabriel," there was no reason for Burning Bush to stick around. I will say that the character was written far better starting around Xmas, but even the baby switch story can play out even better with Sharon, Nick, Adam, Chelsea, Dylan and Victor - there is a lot of material for all of those characters in this story. In fact, it IS better without the birth mother just getting kid back as per standard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do not understand. Of course Bay City wasn't real. Who said anything different, ever?
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Yes. Kenickie was not a good fit for B&B
    • I've always wondered who was writing the projections from February to July. And why they weren't credited as head writer.
    • If Barbara overdosed on pills then I definitely think it could possibly be construed as an accident. Otherwise then I don't really see it. It could also be likely that Barbara was just simply forgotten about and faded into obscurity because she was left behind and it was the other Articulettes that became famous.  Also what I meant by earth-shattering was that Ted and Nicole's marriage is on the rocks and Martin, Kat and Nicole still haven't really fully forgiven Ted for what happened. Then again, maybe I'm just being a bit hyperbolic. I mean, Nicole still hasn't even decided whether or not she wants to file for divorce and actually I'm kind of surprised that subject has not been broached upon yet. 
    • Once again, Giovanni Mazza killed it. He's got a bright future ahead of him, and hopefully GH doesn't lose him as quickly as they lost Nick Chavez. And once again, Emma spoke for all of us. They really need to establish a stronger friendship between her and Trina. And, I'd find that the custody battle would be a lot more interesting if it involved characters that I actually liked  Clearly, the WSB needed a new honeypot, and who better than Joss 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I think we're all glad 
    • Schenkel was a disaster despite being a nice guy. The show was doing fine I thought (and watched live) under Culliton/Tomlin but Schenkel dismantled the writing team and proceeded to oversee a merry go round for several months until they brought in Sam Hall to collaborate with Spencer.  Here's the writer changes from the AW homepage (fairly accurate too although Tomlin remained on the head writing team at least through mid February if not a little longer) Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin, July 1984 - January 1985 (In 1984, with Linda Elstad, Joe LeSueur, Lloyd Gold, Gary Tomlin, David Cherrill, Carolyn DeMoney Culliton, Judith Donato, Samuel D. Ratcliffe, Frances Myers, Roger Newman, Judith Pinsker, Cynthia Saltzman, and Warren Hite) (In 1985, with David Cherill, Carolyn Demoney Culliton, Judith Donato, Samuel D. Ratcliffe, Frances Myers, Roger Newman, Judith Pinsker, and Stephen Wardwell) Gary Tomlin, January 1985 (With Samuel D. Ratcliffe and Gillian Spencer; Richard Culliton, Carolyn DeMoney Culliton, Judith Donato, David Cherill, Judith Pinsker, Frances Myers, Roger Newman, Lloyd Gold, Cynthia Saltzman, and Elizabeth Levin) No headwriter, February 1985 - July 1985 (With Samuel D. Ratcliffe, Gillian Spencer, Caroline Franz, David Cherrill, Judith Donato, Richard Culliton, Fran Myers, Roger Newman, Carolyn DeMoney Culliton, James W. Kearns, Elizabeth Tooker, Peter Brash, and Ted Kubiak) Sam Hall and Gillian Spencer, August 1985 - March 1986 (In 1985 with Jan Hartman, Elizabeth Tooker, Peter Brash, David Cherill, Richard Culliton, Frances Myers, Roger Newman, Carolyn DeMoney Culliton, Todd Kessler, and Eric Rubinton) (In 1986 with Peter Brash, David Cherrill, Barbara A. Morgenroth, Fran Myers, Roger Newman, Carolyn DeMoney Culliton, Todd Kessler, Elizabeth Wallace, Donna Pode, John Boni, Penelope Koechl, Elizabeth Tooker, and Richard Culliton)
    • Finally got to the Thorne switchover in 1989. OG Thorne's drunk acting in his last episode was pretty awful. For a second I wondered if the performance was so bad Bill Bell felt he had no choice but to recast ASAP....until I remembered he was fine with letting Terri Ann Lynn vacantly shriek her lines for 2 1/2 years with no problem. Crazy that if SON was around in 1989 there might be a debate if Ron Moss was the 2nd best Forrester actor, rather than being the worst actor in daytime. Lauren Koslow finally had some decent material in August/September. Seeing Margo briefly interact with Stephanie & Caroline made the actress come alive. It seemed when the show started, she was there to mix it up with the power players, instead of being stuck on the B team with Kristin, Clarke & Mick (was the casting notice for this part a Kale Brown-type doing a Christopher Walken impression?). Anyway, the way Bill Bell wrote for her makes one appreciate James E. Reilly. Bobbie Eakes was a very pleasant surprise. I haven't had too much exposure to the character before. She was confident and watchable from day 1. I guess Rocco and Nick fell in love and left LA together offscreen.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I was praying this pool set would retire... but nope. We're stuck with it for another agonising summer. LordT help us.
    • I wonder if Anita stole the spotlight at Barbara’s funeral in the same way Ms. Ross did when she arrived to Florence Ballard’s funeral in this over the top ensemble with cameras focused on her.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Justice for Tracy, Sharon and Barbara! Anita is the real villian and she shouldnt be painted as the victim. The Articulettes was the dream of Barbara who founded them only for Anita to steal the group and throw them away when she was done using them for her come up.One of the worse things you can do to a person is ruin their reputation and Anita was complicit in having Tracy and Sharon basically trashed and blackballed, thus ruining any chance they had of bouncing back   I wondr if the public think Barbara's death was an accident but the sad reality is, she is likely forgotten as an unknown footnote in the Articulettes origin story.   Anita didnt do anything that would warrant jail time but she should suffer. I hope this story is really a redemption one for Sharon and Tracy whom have their names cleared and they are able to be celebrated and have their accomplishments to music history recognized on a grand stage. Right now, this has all been about elevating Anita's own self and reliving her on glory. She needs to take a back seat and do right by those women and honor Barbara's legacy. She's a part of black history and Anita erased her

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy