Jump to content

Star Trek Returning to Television?


Marco Dane

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No, which the OP would have known had he read the article. But I think it may happen eventually.

I know Bryan Fuller had wanted to do it a few years ago with Angela Bassett as a starship captain, which I would have loved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I would love a new Star Trek TV series, but there is (or was) a big feud going on behind the scenes for the franchise. So unless CBS and Paramount are getting along better now, I don't expect one.

When Old Viacom split into New Viacom and CBS Corp, the Star Trek rights got split as well. Paramount owns the movies, CBS the tv shows. At first it wasn't a big deal, because after Nemesis bombed and Enterprise got canceled, both decided to rest the franchise, but when the first JJ Abrams movie came out, that's when the marriage became strained.

Paramount wanted CBS to stop marketing merchandise for classic series, so Paramount could focus on the new movie merchandise, CBS making too much money, had no financial incentive to play along, didn't. This then spilled over into tv shows. After the first JJ Trek was a success, some execs on CBS wanted to make a Trek tv series, but they wanted it to be set in the main timeline, not the JJ one. Paramount, didn't want a tv show yet and only wanted "one team at a time" and any tv series to be set in the JJ timeline. CBS, only gets paid a licensing free from Paramount, so they resist any idea making a JJ timeline tv show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And of course, at the moment ST3 is under fire - they've had to re-think the whole thing from the ground up with most of the Bad Robot crew mercifully gone, and Paramount brought in Justin Lin, who made a lot of fun hits with the F&F films, and they got Simon Pegg to start reworking the story after Kurtzman & Orci's team collapsed. Hopefully Pegg will come up with something decent. Idris Elba, I'm hearing, may play the villain.

I had no problem with the first ST reboot film, and thought it was a great cast and mostly a really good effort despite the usual JJ Abrams schtick. My problem came with Into Darkness, where the limits of Abrams, Bad Robot and co. once again reared their heads for me - cheap nostalgia, cynical viral marketing and a void of new story. But they have a wonderful cast and a lot of opportunities.

That being said? I am fine with going back to the prime universe and telling new stories with a more cutting-edge aesthetic a la the films, as opposed to the dry rot of the Berman/Braga years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The central problem of the Abrams movies is the huge lack of chemistry between miscast Quinto and miscast Pine, which, along with the need to remind us what big lady-loving studs they both are, meant there was no believable relationship between Kirk and Spock. No one wants to go see a movie about the love story of manly man Spock and insecure nagging Uhura.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought both, along with McCoy and Chekov were well cast.

That was all so wrong. Everyone knows that the person that loves Mr Spock is Nurse Chapel. I don't see why they feel that had to change something which worked just fine on the show. The same holds true for Capt Pike. Every Trekker worth their ears knows that Pike was mute and in a wheelchair and is part of the reason why the only death penalty on the federation books exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set it ablaze?). Victoria briefly moved into the ranch after the fire, with Claire, Johnny and Katie, I think? Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole then moved into the tack house as soon as Teriah left. I guess Victoria's children Johnny and Katie would live with Victoria at the tack house eventually? But Johnny and Katie went to boarding school during the school year. Not sure if we'll see Johnny and Katie for the summer vacation or where they would live.
    • Victoria’s previous house burned down.    And I know why characters frequent Crimson Lights 3 times a day for brownies, muffins and empty mugs:   THERE’S PCP IN EVERYTHING. 
    • Today was a good episode, and the week for that matter. I think they've also done a better job with background music. The scenes in todays episode weren't as silent as they usually are in the background and it was noticeable. I think the show has found its groove well and I'm still invested. 
    • Garneau was in the Liberal party and his riding was in Montreal. He was the first Canadian in outer space.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy