Jump to content

Backstage Mysteries: Forever Unsolved


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Goutman at one point referred to Katie as "America's sweetheart" (vomit), so I imagine he had an exaggerated sense of the character's appeal. Maybe he wanted to connect her to the Hughes family, so that the audience would have to tolerate her...whether we could stomach her or not. The show making Nancy Hughes a supporting player to Katie's life also baffled me.

As for Alexandra Moltke, DS let her out of her contract because she was pregnant. She later said that she was stifled playing a good girl victim, who basically wandered around asking, "What's happening?" She said she would come back to the show if TPTB allowed her to play a "bad" girl (Victoria could have become possessed, for example), but the producers declined and so Moltke was out for good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sexual harassment. What that means exactly, I can't say. But allegedly, Maeve Kinkead was suing (or was going to sue) Rauch and P&G until the latter came up with the solution of transferring her to GL and creating the role of Vanessa for her. #grainofsalt

My guess? Depending on when this incident occurred, Jacqueline Courtney. I think OL and ABC had a lot riding on her and George Reinholt joining their show and were willing to accommodate them through any means necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My first thought was Courtney, too, which would explain Holly's decades-long bitterness towards her. She was still bad-mouthing Courtney during interviews for Jeff Gilles' book.

On the other hand, Linda Dano once gave an interview in which she spoke of joining OLTL, and how the rule was that everyone had to share a dressing room. Dano was put in with Courtney. Why would Courtney have to share accommodations with anyone else, but not Holly? I could see if the network had mandated that Courtney and Holly share Holly's room, when Courtney first joined the show, but not that Courtney take over the dressing room completely, and have a private space for herself while Holly had to change clothes in the hallway. That's just...weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My heart goes out to Ellen Holly because she was so important to the show, she is a talented actor, and she deserved to be one of the pillars of OLTL. Her kids should have been just as front and center as Dorian or Viki's families. And I belive Rauch was terrible to her.

But she also makes my head hurt. I think she is determined to make everyone as awful as Rauch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The whole Maeve Kinkead/Paul Rauch thing was weird. At first, I thought it was just the die-hard Mattessa fans whining about anything and everything under the sun. But as you watched, you couldn't help but notice repeated digs at Vanessa's age, her diminishing looks, etc. From Beth Raines, to the Reva Clone, to the doctor performing Dinah's reconstructive surgery (after she got burned). It was too coincidental to be innocent.

I think she went recurring in 1999 and finally left for good in the summer of 2000, with Kurt McKinney disappearing soon after, once his contract expired.

However, she did return for GL's 50th television anniversary in June of 2002, when Rauch was still here. I guess Rauch could at least put aside his ego for the sake of the show every now 'n then.

P.S. She originally left in the summer of 1996, with the intention of taking a year off. This was before Rauch joined the show. She actually ended up returning sooner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. As a vital, core, original cast member, Ellen Holly should have been central to the series as the decades passed. She was a wonderful actress, and her character was complex, layered, and interesting. I have no doubt that Raunch was terrible to her, and that she experienced bigotry within the industry, particularly in the 1960s and '70s, but her insistence that so many people were relentlessly abusive to her tends to...strain credibility. I cannot, for example, believe that Erika Slezak referred to Holly and the actress who played her mother as, "those black bitches!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Alas, all of the truly great writers of the soap opera genre have either passed away, or moved away from daytime TV.

Why the networks don't recruit fresh new talent, and rely instead on tired hacks whose track record of failure cannot be denied, is another unsolved mystery! :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think OLTL may have actually tried to ask Ellen Holly back in 2011 before the show went off. That was a claim at one point, anyway, that she was on the wishlist. I assume she said no if it's true, as she had in 1992 or '93 for another anniversary event headed up by Linda Gottlieb. Then there was that whole horrific Geocities-esque website she did right before the show went off which called her entire tenure on the show a disgrace and heaped abuse on Agnes Nixon.

The real disgrace is how she was treated by the show early on. I don't believe every claim she makes or agree with everything she's said, but I think what became of her character was just awful and I'll always believe there was more they could've done. At least use the family, if she won't appear. You can reference her and talk about her through children and grandchildren.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She should not have been marginalized. Her story made the success of the soap. People that watched the show back then (my grandmother did) still talk about that story because it was different and important. I can absolutely believe network executives and people on the show were uncomfortable with a black actress as the star of the show at that time and said and did terrible things to her during her tenure. I also think time has made her bitter to the point of hating everyone on the show. But I can't blame her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Titan, I actually think ATWT had more energy in its final months than Days does now, but that's just me. You hit the nail on the head with some of your comments.

I have to wonder if Days is the blind item about a power struggle. Someone connected with this show must know what it used to be about. The fiery spirit of the supercouples. The love stories. The romance. The intrigue. The drama.

It's almost like Tomlin or someone at NBC is saying, and pardon my French, "I know the viewers want people like Peter Reckell, Matt Ashford and Stephen Nichols back. I know they want the supercouples back, and I'll be goddamned if I give them their wish. The long-time fans can !@#$%^&*] off."

No one knows how to rescue this show and it's obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • Andrew sure has hard nips.
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy