Jump to content

Tyler Perry's 'If Loving You Is Wrong'


London

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 474
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

I just saw last week's. I think this show is so much better than The Have and the Have Nots. The pacing seems better and the characters are more relatable.

Dang, why they gotta blame Kelly? LOL....it was funny how people were giving her dirty looks. I didnt like how Natalie went in on Kelly when she thought she was the ho, yet was sympathetic and willing to give the actual thot. Alex, a pass

Go Brad! I loved him beating up on Randall. Dude was asking for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cant with the double standards that Natalie and Esme have. They were both looking at Kelly dirty ready to rip into her for being a homewrecking slut, yet they both are nice to Alex when they find out what she did and act all dissapppointed bc Kelly thinks less of that ho. Really? What about Marcie? Arent they friends with her too? Why does the whore get support?

I used to hate Kelly in season 1 but she's emerging as one of my faves

When Brad asked if Randall was bigger than him, why didnt Alex just lie and say no? She's so dumb

She so dumb. She lies about everything but couldnt lie about that? And who keeps a calendar and grades their sex sessions like that? Thats some HS type sh-t. Isnt she in her 30s with kids? Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marcie only knew Alex, I believe Alex introduce Marcie to the other girls. Remember in season one, Marcie was throwing shade at Esme because Marcie though Esme was a slut. But the way her & Natalie are acting, I believe they still are sluts.

I think it's Kelly storyline that you hate. I hope they every up a fix that. Either give him to Kelly or let her move on.

Edited by MoTheGreat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy