Jump to content

Tyler Perry's 'If Loving You Is Wrong'


London

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 474
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

I just saw last week's. I think this show is so much better than The Have and the Have Nots. The pacing seems better and the characters are more relatable.

Dang, why they gotta blame Kelly? LOL....it was funny how people were giving her dirty looks. I didnt like how Natalie went in on Kelly when she thought she was the ho, yet was sympathetic and willing to give the actual thot. Alex, a pass

Go Brad! I loved him beating up on Randall. Dude was asking for it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I cant with the double standards that Natalie and Esme have. They were both looking at Kelly dirty ready to rip into her for being a homewrecking slut, yet they both are nice to Alex when they find out what she did and act all dissapppointed bc Kelly thinks less of that ho. Really? What about Marcie? Arent they friends with her too? Why does the whore get support?

I used to hate Kelly in season 1 but she's emerging as one of my faves

When Brad asked if Randall was bigger than him, why didnt Alex just lie and say no? She's so dumb

She so dumb. She lies about everything but couldnt lie about that? And who keeps a calendar and grades their sex sessions like that? Thats some HS type sh-t. Isnt she in her 30s with kids? Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marcie only knew Alex, I believe Alex introduce Marcie to the other girls. Remember in season one, Marcie was throwing shade at Esme because Marcie though Esme was a slut. But the way her & Natalie are acting, I believe they still are sluts.

I think it's Kelly storyline that you hate. I hope they every up a fix that. Either give him to Kelly or let her move on.

Edited by MoTheGreat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Both EE and Corrie remind me of RC's OLTL, where maybe, just maybe, if we keep bringing up the past in cheesy, forced ways, the audience will transfer their positive memories of better days onto what we're giving them now. I used to love that kind of crap, but it became so constant and transparent with OLTL, not to mention obnoxious as hell. Like when they had KDP singing the Peabo Bryson theme over the opening sequence for an episode or two. I've been reading little blurbs about Sonia's exit, and they all mention trumpets as if the she had grown up and became a trumpet virtuoso. It's too sitcommy to me, just like Bianca being damn near 50 and still wearing the jacket and hoops. But then they like to introduce new young female characters and put them in a metallic jacket and hoops so that the audience will like them right away. Things just hit better when it's more of an "If you know, you know," type of thing. Like Max watching Stacey's plane leave in 2010 as Stacey gazes down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence...just like when Phil watched Kathy's plane leave in 1998 as Kathy gazed down at the Thames in reference to the opening sequence. It's like the more "iconic" the original scene is, the less effective the later allusion to it is. B&B and Y&R recreating their first scenes were perfect because we don't get hit over the head with how incredibly iconic those scenes were to begin with.
    • Ted has been too-good-to-be-true-on-the-surface guy from the get go. It's always these guys that end up having a secret mistress with 2 children on the side or are secretly bisexual and sleeping with men while they wifey thinks she is living the dream. Even the way Dani was talking about them in the beginning... I knew it was coming. The show was hinting at it. And it came.  I have nothing against the show writing a second affair, when it's used to present this exact type of message. That the two sisters end up dealing with a similar catastrophe. I would have had problems with it... if it was not written the way it is. But I have no problems with it right now. And I love how the focus is not just on the affair, but on Ted's overall character. His dark side. And, no, you don't need to be a serial killer or a lunatic with a knife to be a bad guy. Sometimes just making bad decisions that end up hurting your entire family makes you that.   
    • Oh, really? I didn't see that at all. Ted's only been loving and supportive, even with this reveal I still haven't seen anything too dark from him. Shitty father and husband, sure. My one nitpick is that they could have accomplished that without having another affair though. 
    • Remember post-ATWT how Brooke Alexander was in eight million commercials and home improvement shows?  She was the epitome of a millennial consumer surrogate. Meanwhile, Kelly Menighan worked the heck out of the short hairdo for years, and never got a beauty contract.  TBH, her whole vibe gave Midwest suburbs, as interpreted through the eyes of a Manhattan costume department with a network budget for designer goods. She was definitely sophisticated given her limited access to shopping at Lisa's Boutique in Oakdale.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      This is mine!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Absolutely agree. Nicole's reaction to Ted, and Kat's reaction to Eva, will be interesting.
    • One tiny problem. Apparently she just inked a new deal. All it means, though, is that they will want to get some mileage out of her before they implement the DRW50 Master Plan. What do ya think? 6 months too short? 3 years def too long. A year and a half?
    • Your haughtiness amuses me in return. Like you think you know ALL?
    • I've seen this error before. I think it should be okay in the future.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy