Jump to content

AMC: Monday May 27, 2013 Episode Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

So are we heading for a long drawn out Finding Cassandra storyline arc? Are we going into the Summer Slump? I hope by the beginning of July, things will wrap up and we can see a great Teen/20 Somethings summer storyline since PP is looking for better balance between the vets and younger actors.

Episode was Ok and seemed like a "filler/set-up" type episode.

Glad to see Dr. Joe back.

Wednesday should have some great scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not understanding. How is even MORE teens creating the better balance. There should be LESS teens after this and more vets and last I looked none of the vets are 20 something. I think once they wrap up the Cass thing they should give frontburner to the Chandler (ie Adam, Brooke not just AJ and his endless whining) doings. I'd like to see Adam and Brooke deal with the CE problems, AJ's OTT whining, Jr's shenanigans together. Like Jessie/Angie are dealing with Cass being gone. And plan and go through with their wedding.

Jr and Cara scenes are good. Those kind of scenes in content and length can be given to other members of that family. Not everything revolves around AJ's latest hysteria.

Brooke hosting Tempo talk is would be like a throw back to when Adam bought WRCW for her so she could bring Tempo to tv. Hope she doesn't turn him down this time.

I'd like to see Opal have scenes that are nothing about her son's love life. I'd like more of what we had today with David/Joe at the hospital. I like seeing Bianca. Dixie's a therapist? Let's involve her in the hospital goings on. There's a whole lot of time that could be spent on others and having the characters connect if each episode didn't have 1/2 of it designated to the teens various whining/insta romances.

Balance and rotation are key. From day one with the teen 4 it's felt like a neverending 'it's summer let's break out the teens' story although it was Spring. Dear God I hope there's less - not more.

And I think this episode was written as mid week for the 4 day setup so until the new writing kicks in it's all going to feel disjointed. Guess if/when they increase to 4 or 5 those eps will seem like 'Friday' episodes everyday.

Loved seeing Joe back. Really enjoyed the scenes at the hospital.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ah, thanks. So when Angie has found Cassandra, maybe David can try his pitch again with Angie, who would be much more receptive.

As for whether David was talking about Project Orpheus in terms of his research, I thought he distinctly said "while I was in prison," so it was new stuff in the last 5 years.

Something I forgot to mention before from last week is I'm glad they had Miranda go back to school and see it wasn't as bad as she thought, that projecting confidence and finding friends who back you up can work, that "whatever it takes," you and your friends can help you "make it through" (as in the Degrassi song) -- that she doesn't necessarily have to transfer. Not every child has the luxury of transferring and I think it would have been a pretty downbeat message for that to be the only way for her to deal with her bullying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
just rewatched and you are right. He definitely said "those 5 years I spent in prison, I developed a method to use the body's own stem cells to bind to a nano-device...." Really makes no sense. Did they give him his own lab space? Unless they are saying people worked for him and did occasional consulting from the prison to monitor their progress (which also doesn't seem likely)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, it's interesting that the first episode I've watched since the writer turnover makes me ready for a change. Although, I don't know if promoting existing script writers to be the head writers will do the trick for me, because I actually think AMC might have some good long-range story building momentum. It's the day-to-day execution that is getting clumsier by the week. (Whereas oddly enough, I find OLTL more polished/engaging on a daily basis but it doesn't necessarily seem to be going anywhere.) I can almost deal with the cringe-inducing but innocuous teen dialogue (and, in some cases, acting), but what really bothers me is that this show is exhibiting some of the worst misogyny of network soaps.

There was a moment a couple of weeks ago when I thought maybe this trafficking story would be handled with the sensitivity it deserves and actually focus on what it should focus on: e.g., how this type of experience affects women. (Around the time Angie found out and met that trafficking survivor at the hospital, and there was that disturbing but oddly powerful montage of Angie praying while Cassandra was stripping.) Any last hope I had of that went out the window with today's scenes with Zach and this FBI agent. I don't know which was worse: him telling her that she is a hard bitch because deep down she doubts her competence in a male-dominated profession, or whatever nonsense he was spewing, or completing the orgasm puzzle in front of her.

Frankly, I'm confused by Zach's role in this story, even plotwise. I originally thought Cassandra's kidnapping was ultimately going to be about a vendetta against him and/or Jesse, and the trafficking aspect was just skeevy window dressing to prove this isn't your mother's All My Children anymore. Didn't Vlad try to frame Zach by using one of his casino's cars or something? Fortunately, that aspect has been dropped, but I don't understand why he is still involved, let alone why his reaction to what is happening is so central. What was his relationship with the Hubbards previously?

Even if they were very close, though, I don't care how Zach - or any man - feels about what is being done to Cassandra. I'm not even particularly glued to my screen to see close-ups of Jesse, her own father, watching Cassandra's porno in horror on Wednesday. Men pounding their chests wanting to avenge the rape of women with whom they feel territorial is not groundbreaking...in fact, it comes from the same emotional place that has historically led to some things that are pretty terrible in their own right, like lynching (which was often justified by false allegations that the men had raped white women) and honor killings against rape survivors. Cassandra is the victim in this story, period, and making it a plot device for Zach's vendetta and/or this weird rom-com objectifies women in and of itself.

And just to drive the point home that this show is still being put out by people with very antiquated views about women's agency over their own bodies, we had the ridiculous spectacle of David screaming in the waiting area of a hospital - one in which he wishes to work - that women who have abortions are murderers. Even the doctor in charge, who had already threatened to call security on him, did nothing to intervene except offer pity to the apparently fallen woman after David finished his tantrum and left of his own accord. Good lord, abortion is a legal procedure; potentially disrupting medical care by disturbing the peace in the middle of a hospital is not. That's why in real life people who share David's views are at least confined to vocalizing them outside of medical facilities...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, Zach's connection to the sex-trafficking story was tenuous from the start, and merely an excuse to bring back Thorsten Kaye, an actor who, IMO, this re-boot could have done without.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does seem like they quickly at least modified the connection to Zach (the implication originally was, it seemed, that Cass was targetred due to fairly tenuous links to Zach which would make no sense if now they didn't even know her step-father was the chief of police.) I preferr that it was dropped because making it entirely a a targeted issue seemed less realistic and the reasoning never really made sense to me.

As for view of misogyny, I think it is a valid thing to discuss. I feel like for the most part they've managed to successfully walk a fine line--and some justification of rZack and David's actions could just be explained as that being very true tro character (certainly David's rant was not shown as being a good thing.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, it might have made more sense to have Cassandra kidnapped and forced into human-trafficking by the same individuals who once forced Jesse to fake his death. (Didn't he take a bullet meant for John Remington?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I have nothing to add. Everything you said is on point, and I don't know whether to laugh hysterically at it or throw things at the television. I do know it's terrible soap opera.  
    • Characterization: - I realized I have PTSD from Ted #1’s constant swaying. The moment I saw NuTed, I actually caught myself thinking, “Why isn’t he rocking?” - Leslie makes very little sense from a storytelling perspective unless she’s completely psychotic. What was she hoping to achieve with all her dramatic reveals and aliases? Also… who wouldn’t put two and two together after Laura’s accident? - Anita and Dani come across as mean-spirited, and honestly, the Duprees should just be portrayed as full-on villains. Been saying this since day one—remember when Dani punched Haley and the whole Dupree clan just walked away from her with that “shame on you” look? Wrong on so many levels. Glad others are finally seeing it too. - Mona is sanctimonious and I can’t stand her. She’s the worst kind of person: lower-to-middle class but constantly making excuses for the rich. - Call me crazy, but I’m actually enjoying Ashley and Derek’s storyline. I’ll take this neurotic OCD queen over the sanctimonious, multi-talented nurse any day. Plus, soap couples are usually so plastic. They deal with insane drama but never go to the bathroom, never plan a weekend away. Look at Kat and Tomas—every scene is just them planning lunch or dinner…! - Btw by now André seems bored af by Ashley.   WTF Moments: - No young woman would be even remotely interested in going to a casino (looking at Eva). And it’s wild how the show is treating gambling like it’s some kind of therapeutic hobby—like retail therapy or something. - What are they doing with Smitty’s eyebrows… and more importantly, why?   Parallels with Other Soaps: - I like Nicole, but she reinforces my belief that soaps should never include psychiatrists. If they’re portrayed accurately, they ruin the fun by rationalizing everyone’s childish and selfish behavior. If they’re portrayed inaccurately (hi Taylor from B&B), it’s equally bad. - Anita’s story is giving major SSM vibes from 2017‘s Y&R, when Victor got Nikki to start playing the piano again.  - Karla played a model on B&B too…

      Please register in order to view this content

        Direction & Continuity: - Pascarelli is hands down the worst director this show has. - Wednesday’s episode started with a nighttime establishing shot of Orphey Gene’s… but all the scenes that followed were clearly set in daytime—until halfway through the episode, when it suddenly switched back to night. - The picture on the piano at the Duprees’ house shows two little girls and two little boys. Who are the boys? One could be Martin (or Tyrell?), but who’s the other kid? (And speaking of pictures… no one under 50 is walking around with a printed photo in their pocket. But I digress.) - I love catching the time on the phones when they pop up onscreen. Friday’s episode was supposedly set before lunch, but Vernon’s phone said 3:15 in one scene and 3:50 in the next. A few scenes later, Kat is playing Leslie’s audio for Jacob and her phone shows 10:40. Cool. 
    • I forget that throughout the 80’s the TV seasons were officially over in April. Not sure why that was the case but it wasn’t until the mid-90’s that May Sweeps became a real official thing. 
    • Jon Lindstrom proved with Ryan Chamberlain on GH that he can play menacing and evil. He's not doing it here, and I think it's a combination of writing and performance.   To be fair, Longoria has modeled and has represented major companies like L'Oreal, but she was never a runway model. I don't have any problem with seeing Dani as a runway model. I think it's more than possible, and I don't understand anyone criticizing her look. I actually have a bigger problem with the whole "Anita is an EGOT" thing. I think it goes way too far. Give her a Grammy. Say she was nominated for a Tony, or even won. But an EGOT winner? No.   The fact that you're using DAYS to defend a BTG set is telling, since we all know DAYS is poverty level soapdom. I expect so much more and better from Gates.     I can't help it, but I'm LOL at the people defending that backroom bingo hall casino and making excuses for it. It's hilariously bad.  
    • If NBC could have for seen the ratings of Lovers & Friends (the replacement for Somerset).. they would have for sure kept Somerset on the air longer. https://jason47.com/days/ratings1976.html  (ratings for Somerset in the final year) https://jason47.com/days/ratings1977.html (ratings for Lovers & Friends short run...getting as low as a 2 rating).  
    • 35 years ago tonight was the series finale. Promo at 11:43

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I liked them, too, and was really disappointed it never went anywhere. The whole art theft story was ridiculous, but they had a nice chemistry. Certainly nicer than Alan with Christine. With her, he looked like the funny uncle. The worst thing they did to Bolger, IMO, was having Phillip write that DREADFUL novel and dramatizing it while he wrote it. GAG, that has to be in the running for one of their worst storylines that didn't involve wacky things like clones or time travel. Soaps rarely do school storylines, or don't do them for very long. Not the case so much in the early days of soaps, but after GH took off in the late 70s other soaps took their lead and would catapult teens/young adults into adult stories right away. That's one reason Phillip and Mindy ended up with so many ex-spouses--they started getting married really young. They shipped Dina and Cameron off really fast after high school and stuck Alan Michael in a marriage storyline with Harley. Did he EVER go to college? I don't think so. It may also partly explain why Quint and Annabelle had to go, beyond TPTB wanting to do a cast sweep. Teaching is not a profession that plays well on a soap. Quint definitely had to quit being Indiana Jones, because that wore thin really fast, but they didn't do him favors by making him a professor. If they wanted to keep him, they should have done what they did with Amanda (who was in another dead-end soap job, concert pianist)--have him work at Spaulding as one of the major stockholders.
    • Judith McConnell (Augusta) and Denise Alexander (Lesley) were great screen partners on GH.  They got into some stellar arguments in character in the medicine room.
    • He also commented that Brad knows that fans are sick of the constant fake deaths on this show: Finn, Sheila, etc and that it's hard to take this seriously if it's another fake death    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy