Jump to content

BREAKING NEWS: Prospect Park Names New Head Writers of BOTH ‘All My Children’ and ‘One Life to Live’


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I honestly just feel it's something the American daytime audience isn't so used to seeing day in and day out, that kind of casual youthful debauchery and foolishness, and navel-gazing, all of which I think is very realistic - I see it on the UK soaps from time to time, though I haven't much time for them these days, and I think both the new AMC and particularly the new OLTL are striving for more of that feeling of an episodic, semi-contained story every half hour, with vignettes like that for the youngsters and so on. That may have contributed to the new writers at both shows, and a few of the people at OLTL both in the HW slots and the corps have some impressive other credits. But it eventually builds to something bigger, which I think is obviously coming here. I just like the stuff a lot, and I can easily watch them everyday so long as equal time is meted out to other stories and characters I enjoy. But I can see where it's alienating some viewers.

When we get to, say, four days of Cutter and Natalie romping naked around her apartment, then I'll be really happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha! Well you know that we usually agree.

I will agree that while I think OLTL as it stands sincew this week is on extremely solid ground, I have wondered where some of the stories were leading--if anywhere--whereas the show did seem stronger out of the gate (than AMC.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that the OLTL youth dialogue is quite realistic and doesn't make them one-dimensional or vacuous. However, I have to disagree that only network soap kids are dreaming of settling down and getting married. Five years ago in Texas, I took over an apartment from a 20 or 21-year-old college junior who was moving out to marry his fiance in a few months, who he had gone to high school with, and not because they'd created a baby by "accident" either. They then had a baby a couple years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Vee, I didn't know you were straight!

Edit: Ok, my comment is too vague ... What I mean, albeit jokingly, is that surely you must be referring to Natalie only!

I remember being underwhelmed in 2011 by Josh Kelly in his motel boxer-briefs, thinking that there wasn't much going on downstairs whether it was in front or in back, lol....

(Now you've got me talking like Dani & Matt! Thanks for the influence... tongue.png)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I'm not, at all, ever; I just like the idea of things being equal-opportunity in other age groups, and Natalie is one of my favorite characters. I also don't mind JK or Cutter at all, he's great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My kids are that age and although I realize my observations of their behavior come from a different vantage point, I still think OLTL is displaying them at their worst. Selfish, superficial, irresponsible and lacking depth. Matthew shirking fatherhood. Dani apparently having nothing to occupy her other than sexual fantasies and where to find her next high. I could be naive or in denial, but I really hope that's not an accurate representation of my own kids and their contemporaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the characters are more complex than you give them credit for. Matthew isn't just shirking fatherhood ... He is conflicted and wants Drew to have a good life but is immature so he doesn't know how to go about it. We've seen him asking after Drew, insisting he can babysit, looking in on Drew through a window, and looking like Clint's lecture got through to him a bit. Dani is also not just occupied with sexual fantasies. We saw her consoling Tea after Victor left, and volunteering to babysit for Destiny. Jeffrey is also far more responsible and clear about his values and his career than either of the other two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where do you get that Matthew is conflicted? Other than when Clint is chastising him, I don't see him conflicted or concerned about Drew in the least. Especially when he was blaming Destiny for not terminating the pregnancy when his child was sitting right there. I think you read too much into very minor portions of their story, when most of their screentime is devoted to showing them in fairly shallow pursuits. Destiny and Jeffrey are far more interesting than dani or Matthew to me. because they are shown to have real conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show has done a lot to show that he cares about Drew and just has no grasp of how to step up and be a father. That's why he was all hypocritical as early as the first episode and hounded Destiny about why she was out at night and who was looking after Drew, her brother? In addition to the babysitting, there is also when he was all "hi ... hi Drew" when Destiny and Jeffrey came to the door and caught him and Destiny on the couch. If he didn't care, he wouldn't bother. Also, I don't think there's anything "minor" about anything shown on a 25-minute soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it all comes down to "home training," for lack of a better word. All young adults are reckless and self-centered to one degree or another; they can't help BUT be that way as they struggle to find their own path in life. However, if you were raised by strict (but fair) parents who established boundaries from the get, your choices tend to be more grounded. (I'm not saying this is true for EVERY child raised in such an environment, by the way. There ARE exceptions even to this rule.) Ergo, when you remember how Matthew and especially Dani were raised, and all the drama that surrounded their lives and those of their parents, I think it makes sense on one level for them to behave as they do now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Phew, that was close to disaster!

      Please register in order to view this content

      I suspect we would have had a few withdrawals next year if Israel had won. I don't think many people would relish going to Jerusalem as things stand now. Not to mention it would have been a prime target for terrorist attacks.   
    • And they've given us plenty. Sets, outdoor scenes, music licensing, etc. And that was the point of me using DAYS... so. It's obvious the casino set is not intended for long-term use, hence why it's likely it wasn't as evolved as the other community sets, etc.
    • Enjoy Errol!  Your guy! Teehee @Errol  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I just had thought of how to save the Perkins family. (Inspired by Rituals) -- What if Marisa Perkins was Augusta Lockridge's sister? Fictionally, they could've both been local girls, one married rich and one married poor. Originally, I was going to suggest that Marisa be Sophia's sister, but then I realized Joe and Kelly would've been first cousins.  Of course, it would've truly inspired Sophia was if Rosa Andrade sister, with Rosa and Santana moving in to help CC raise the kids once Sophia disappeared.  While this could've avoided both gross CC and Santana affairs, the times were not right for a story about intersectional inequity.
    • https://www.instagram.com/p/DJxW5DLJLId/ Another World is my forever favorite soap opera. But it's finale is almost universally hated by its fans. What this is, is an edit where I've deleted everything I didn't like!!!
    • The Perkins family had potential to be a nice alternative to the more dysfunctional Capwells and wackier Lockridges... but I think a few factors did in the family. 1) Recasting of Joe Perkins 2) Bad casting of the Perkins Patriarch, and the one note writing for that character. 3) Lack of antagonistic interaction between the Capwells/Lockridges and Perkins.  (There was no awkwardness between Jade/Ted.. or CC disapproving of his son being friends with that Perkins girl, etc). 4) Wasting of Jade thus wasting the potential of the actress (which was realized on Days of Our Lives).  She had more potential than Laken oddly enough. The only member of the Perkins family that had appeal and a somewhat thought out story arc was Amy.  
    • @GymnastGuyThanks for posting the three new Capitol 1985 episodes today. The two labeled March 12, and 13 are misidentified. The March 12 labeled one actually aired November 12 1985 which I figured out because Kenny Rogers' movie Wild Horses aired November 12th and it was announced over the "March 12" Cap credits. In addition, Craig Carlson is listed in the April credits but not the March. Craig left Capitol sometime after July 1985 before he rejoined OLTL in the credits by October 15, 1985; he was replaced on Cap by Radcliffe and Hamner. In these posted episodes Radcliffe/Hamner names appear in the March 85 episodes but not in the April.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy