Jump to content

BREAKING NEWS: Prospect Park Names New Head Writers of BOTH ‘All My Children’ and ‘One Life to Live’


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I honestly just feel it's something the American daytime audience isn't so used to seeing day in and day out, that kind of casual youthful debauchery and foolishness, and navel-gazing, all of which I think is very realistic - I see it on the UK soaps from time to time, though I haven't much time for them these days, and I think both the new AMC and particularly the new OLTL are striving for more of that feeling of an episodic, semi-contained story every half hour, with vignettes like that for the youngsters and so on. That may have contributed to the new writers at both shows, and a few of the people at OLTL both in the HW slots and the corps have some impressive other credits. But it eventually builds to something bigger, which I think is obviously coming here. I just like the stuff a lot, and I can easily watch them everyday so long as equal time is meted out to other stories and characters I enjoy. But I can see where it's alienating some viewers.

When we get to, say, four days of Cutter and Natalie romping naked around her apartment, then I'll be really happy.

  • Members
Posted

Ha! Well you know that we usually agree.

I will agree that while I think OLTL as it stands sincew this week is on extremely solid ground, I have wondered where some of the stories were leading--if anywhere--whereas the show did seem stronger out of the gate (than AMC.)

  • Members
Posted

I agree that the OLTL youth dialogue is quite realistic and doesn't make them one-dimensional or vacuous. However, I have to disagree that only network soap kids are dreaming of settling down and getting married. Five years ago in Texas, I took over an apartment from a 20 or 21-year-old college junior who was moving out to marry his fiance in a few months, who he had gone to high school with, and not because they'd created a baby by "accident" either. They then had a baby a couple years ago.

  • Members
Posted

Vee, I didn't know you were straight!

Edit: Ok, my comment is too vague ... What I mean, albeit jokingly, is that surely you must be referring to Natalie only!

I remember being underwhelmed in 2011 by Josh Kelly in his motel boxer-briefs, thinking that there wasn't much going on downstairs whether it was in front or in back, lol....

(Now you've got me talking like Dani & Matt! Thanks for the influence... tongue.png)

  • Members
Posted

Oh, I'm not, at all, ever; I just like the idea of things being equal-opportunity in other age groups, and Natalie is one of my favorite characters. I also don't mind JK or Cutter at all, he's great.

  • Members
Posted

My kids are that age and although I realize my observations of their behavior come from a different vantage point, I still think OLTL is displaying them at their worst. Selfish, superficial, irresponsible and lacking depth. Matthew shirking fatherhood. Dani apparently having nothing to occupy her other than sexual fantasies and where to find her next high. I could be naive or in denial, but I really hope that's not an accurate representation of my own kids and their contemporaries.

  • Members
Posted

I think the characters are more complex than you give them credit for. Matthew isn't just shirking fatherhood ... He is conflicted and wants Drew to have a good life but is immature so he doesn't know how to go about it. We've seen him asking after Drew, insisting he can babysit, looking in on Drew through a window, and looking like Clint's lecture got through to him a bit. Dani is also not just occupied with sexual fantasies. We saw her consoling Tea after Victor left, and volunteering to babysit for Destiny. Jeffrey is also far more responsible and clear about his values and his career than either of the other two.

  • Members
Posted

Where do you get that Matthew is conflicted? Other than when Clint is chastising him, I don't see him conflicted or concerned about Drew in the least. Especially when he was blaming Destiny for not terminating the pregnancy when his child was sitting right there. I think you read too much into very minor portions of their story, when most of their screentime is devoted to showing them in fairly shallow pursuits. Destiny and Jeffrey are far more interesting than dani or Matthew to me. because they are shown to have real conflict.

  • Members
Posted

I think the show has done a lot to show that he cares about Drew and just has no grasp of how to step up and be a father. That's why he was all hypocritical as early as the first episode and hounded Destiny about why she was out at night and who was looking after Drew, her brother? In addition to the babysitting, there is also when he was all "hi ... hi Drew" when Destiny and Jeffrey came to the door and caught him and Destiny on the couch. If he didn't care, he wouldn't bother. Also, I don't think there's anything "minor" about anything shown on a 25-minute soap.

  • Members
Posted

I think it all comes down to "home training," for lack of a better word. All young adults are reckless and self-centered to one degree or another; they can't help BUT be that way as they struggle to find their own path in life. However, if you were raised by strict (but fair) parents who established boundaries from the get, your choices tend to be more grounded. (I'm not saying this is true for EVERY child raised in such an environment, by the way. There ARE exceptions even to this rule.) Ergo, when you remember how Matthew and especially Dani were raised, and all the drama that surrounded their lives and those of their parents, I think it makes sense on one level for them to behave as they do now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I did not care, just clarifying that was the discussion point. If there are ice cream bars in Statesville I am sure there is a full spa
    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy