Jump to content

Dracula: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

Dracula

Golden Globe winner Jonathan Rhys Meyers (“The Tudors”) stars in this provocative new drama as one of the world’s most iconic characters. It’s the late 19th century and the mysterious Dracula (Rhys Meyers) has arrived in London, posing as an American entrepreneur who wants to bring modern science to Victorian society. He’s especially interested in the new technology of electricity, which promises to brighten the night — useful for someone who avoids the sun. But he has another reason for his travels: He hopes to take revenge on those who cursed him with immortality centuries earlier. Everything seems to be going according to plan… until he becomes infatuated with a woman who appears to be a reincarnation of his dead wife. Victoria Smurfit (“About a Boy”), Thomas Kretschmann (“King Kong”), Jessica De Gouw (“Arrow”), Oliver Jackson-Cohen (“Mr. Selfridge”), Nonso Anozie (“Game of Thrones”) and Katie McGrath (“Merlin”) also star.

Writer Daniel Knauf (“Carnival”), Tony Krantz, (“24,” “Sports Night”), Colin Callender and Gareth Neame (“Downton Abbey”) serve as executive producers. “Dracula” is a production of Flame Ventures, Sky Living, Playground Entertainment, Universal Television, NBCUniversal International Television Production and Carnival Film & Television.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Members

This actually wasn't bad at all. It's a completely new version but all the main characters are present. I honestly don't know why they had to reimagine Dracula as a heroic anti-hero out to get revenge on the sinister secret society that seeks to run the world through economic influence, the original story has served him well for 120 years, but it works. The show is beautiful and scenic, and JRM does a good job, I guess the biggest switch up is Van Helsing's role in this one. Renfield has been changed from being a slave to basically being Alfred to Dracula's Bruce Wayne. And I guess that is what Dracula is in this TV show, a Batman that is a little more Bat than the one in Gotham. But it is harmless fun and I will watch faithfully.

One thing, the sword fight with the matrixy slo-mo effects wasn't really needed. Dracula doesn't need to waste his time on stuff like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know what they were thinking here. Why on earth is this show set in past and in London? And why is Dracula American? WTF? It is nonsensical. They could have saved a boat load of money and just had Dracula flee London and come to modern day America to escape his persecutors. Instead JRM has to put on this bad fake accent. Ugh. This show has made itself far more convoluted and given itself unnecessary problems.

Also, by setting the show in London in the early 20th century, they are reducing the diversity of the show. This is so thoughtless and stupid. Compare this to Sleepy Hollow that embraces diversity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of all the things to complain about, the audacity to set Dracula in 19th century London? That's a complaint, that they kept one thing from the book?

Dracula being American is lame, but I guess since it is co-produced by an American company they thought it might appeal more to our audience. It is also co-produced by British TV, so I guess they needed something to appeal to their audiences as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Isn't he masquerading as an American? That's why his "Alfred" corrected his British pronunciation of the word "schedule".

Eh...I didn't get it. I wouldn't know Dracula lore if it bit me in the neck, but this seemed really complicated. It's pretty...that's the most I can really say about it.

And I was much more impressed with Jessica de Gouw on Arrow. Are women really studying surgery in Britain in 1896?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show looks fantastic, but I'm not at all sold on the secret society angle. It's obviously a way to minimize Dracula's evil and make him more of a Barnabas Collins figure, sympathetic to the audience. But in the age of Dexter, Tony Soprano and Walter White, I don't think that's needed. Plus, JRM's American accent is really distracting ... and I swear he looks like he's high most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They always do that on network tv. They are afraid to have real bad guys as the leads so they try to find ways to soften the characters. It is pathetic. Frankly, I got lost with the convoluted mystery society story and could not tell who was who half the time. I will give it a couple more episodes, but it needs to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I am still trying with this show, but it is such a bore. Of course, Dracula was turned evil against his will. He is a victim. RME. Everyone lusting after Mina is so pathetic as is just about everything with this show. Why not have the Katie McGath character lust after Harker instead?They could have let the gay couple survive. I continue to hang in there hoping things will improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe there is a vampire movie I have not seen and I own a considerable amount of VHS and DVDs, but I just can't get into this. JRM is not working for me. I love the production of the show from the sets to the clothing, but it ends there. As much as I love undead movies/tv shows, I can't get thru an entire eppy of this. I've given up trying, and I'm giving up Grimm as well. Perhaps, if I check in by accident down the road, something may click.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This plays like a 19th century version of The Following. Maybe that's just me, but it spends more time focused on blood and gore than story. Grimm at least took the time to build its mythology. Dracula acts like everyone already knows it, and if you don't, like me, you feel lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show spends time on the story. The problem is it and the over arching myth arc is so freaking boring and convoluted. Also, there are so many supporting characters, I can barely keep track of who is who. It takes me forever to figure distinguish one of the society members from each other when they appear in scenes even though I recognize many of the actors from British shows that I have watched over the years. When the young man killed himself, it was the first time I realized who his father was among those skulking men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy