Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

GH never purchased the rights to Skye because ABC ALWAYS owned their soaps (prior to PP getting the rights to original AMC+OLTL characters per agreement) and allowed crossovers when necessary. PP giving Skye back to GH last year was just a rumor that someone from DD started. PP is so focused on OLTL I'm not sure if they are even aware of Skye or are they? Either way that can also help them with their case.

  • Members
Posted

Nevertheless, the point is the characters were the property of Prospect Park. If they want to sue, it's well within their legal right -- regardless of the fact that every single critic without a law degree or a career in the motion picture industry thinks it's asinine. ABC and General Hospital's management are the ones at fault. Do I have my own feelings about the snobbishness of the actors who'd rather work on television than internet shows? Yes. But that's their right. They can turn down a paycheck if they want. However, ABC and General Hospital invested way too much in these characters out of some personal loyalty to the actors. I don't find it a coincidence that they had Todd, John and that thing hook up with core characters. Todd didn't find, say, Alexis attractive. John wasn't into Elizabeth. The chick with the chin wasn't into Trey -- the one she actually HAD CHEMISTRY with and was created by Carlivati... No! They were all into the leads of GH: Carly, Sam and Michael. They tried to hedge their bets by attaching their picks to central figures on the show, thinking that PP wouldn't dare remove them. Guess what? They did! Now they're eating it.

I just love how people are now feeling sorry for poor ABC because of villainous Prospect Park when, 18 months ago, people were boycotting ABC because they dared to cancel AMC and OLTL! My, how the hypocrites wax fickle!

  • Members
Posted

Thank YOU!

People keep forgetting that the pure and noble ABC CANCELLED OLTL. They set this ball rolling. GH would have been cancelled too. Their ratings were not climbing when the decision was made to extend GH. They just didn't reside in the same cellar that The Revolution did. The "good faith" argument holds water for me. ABC sold (not gifted) the rights to the show, it's characters, their histories. There is no question FrankenRon damaged the franchise. Diminished the product. It's not a question of whether the characters are "essential" to OLTL (because they certainly aren't essential to GH). It's that the stories Ron told for them on GH damaged OLTL and the potential stories they intended to tell. If that happened without PP's approval, and their approval was part of the agreement, then PP has every right to sue for damages.

People keep saying when Ron and Frank made the decisions they did for these characters EVERYONE thought PP was dead in the water. But forget that when PP allowed GH to use these characters EVERYONE including FrankenRon thought GH wasn't far behind. The original planned storylines for these three was nowhere close to what it ended up being or what PP agreed to when they loaned/leased the characters for a limited run.

Again. The three aren't "essential" to either show. Heck a man wearing prosthetic legs won Olympic gold. Essential means different things to different people.

  • Members
Posted

Where did you come up with this? The character of Skye belonged to ABC. ABC owned all their soaps at that point. GH wouldn't "need" to purchase her. ABC was free to put her wherever they wanted. Money did not need to be exchanged between soaps to allow the crossover

  • Members
Posted

Even if that was the case, the shows were still owned by ABC..some stars had a direct contracts aka smaller deals with the show..some ala Tony Geary, Robin C, Erika Slezak, Rebecca Budig, Miss Lucci had/have bigger contracts with the network. At the end of the day Skye belongs to PP. Why you think Frank ushered her off with Blair and Tea and we never heard from her again. Maybe it was a slip with Frank and Ron..who knows. I BET Ron won't mention Skye from now on until this PP stuff is ressolved.

  • Members
Posted

I must agree. Although I've said PP was better off dropping the lawsuit and moving on, R Sinclair makes a fast and hard case for why they shouldn't. Love ya, R! :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I’m thoroughly confused why she won’t say anything to Joss. Joss obviously has no intention of telling her.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • He knows from Nicole and Anita   Also good point
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Ted also stays at the hotel and Vernon is probably aware of that. As much as Ted wants to be back in Nicole's good graces he might feel obligated to tell if he saw Vernon coming out of a woman's room since keeping secrets got him in so much trouble before.
    • One more thing on Tuesday's episode, did anyone else notice the weird blocking? Belle and Eric were thanking Sarah, and worrying about Lyme Disease (which must be a red herring, I can't believe we're watching a PSA about inspecting for tics).  Then, Belle turned to EJ and threatened him with a lawsuit.  EJ acted as if he hadn't heard the entire conversation that was happening two inches away from him.   I like EJ, but a little of silly/mean EJ goes a long way.  His sarcasm during that scene felt out of place, regardless of Eric's presence.  When he bugs his eyes, and feigns innocence, it is a little too OTT for my taste.  I understand that he was the punching bag for most scenes, but EJ feels more mature than resorting to funny faces.  Isn't rather quick to worry about Stephanie's sales, she just debuted the book yesterday in their timeline?  And why is everyone against Jada and Theo?  Jada could use a boytoy, and this doesn't feel like a "forever" romance.
    • I dont think he knew Leslie was staying there. I know this is all for the drama and mess which Im here for, but Vernon really could have easily rented a small studio space where he and Sharon could practice lol.
    • I understand that no one could ever replace Bernau, but Ron Raines is somewhat of a different beast. Still great (to me) though. He spent his entire TV run in one role, that was impossible to do justice correctly. 
    • Again, Bernau's illness impacted that. It's pretty obvious Pilon was always meant to be temporary. I read an article from that period that said he was working on both Ryan's Hope and GL at the same time. So he wasn't on contract for either show. (Maybe that explains somewhat why his performance was so low energy, because he was overworked doing two soaps). Later, they put him in the opening and in commercials for the show. That must have been because they were certain Bernau was not returning. Around that time, they approached Zaslow about being the permanent replacement for Bernau. He turned them down and suggested coming back as Roger. Pilon stayed so they could re-introduce Roger and write an exit for Alan. I'm guessing if MZ had not wanted to come back, they would have had no choice but to keep Pilon (which I don't think they wanted, or maybe Pilon wasn't interested) or send out a casting call for a new Alan. I think they wanted to avoid that because they were really determined not to let the nature of Bernau's illness to become public knowledge. At this point, they were still keepin up the fiction that he was going to return even while this stuff was happening BTS.   Yeah, it seems crazy now, but people forget how stigmatized AIDS was back then. I'm convinced the idea to ask Zaslow to take the role came about so they could replace Bernau as quietly as possible. Everyone would have been so surprised it would have taken the focus off Bernau not returning. It makes a kind of twisted sense. Still, thank goodness Zazlow said no and they said yes to his suggestion to return as Roger. The way everything worked out gave GL a few more strong years. I guess it's the nature of soaps, you never know what things in real life will end up strongly impacting the show, both negatively and positively. (Something just occurred to me. If Zazlow HAD said yes to playing Alan...he would have had to play being in love with Reva.

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy