Jump to content

Prospect Park Sues ABC Over ‘One Life To Live’ & ‘All My Children’ Licensing Agreement


Recommended Posts

  • Members

ABC already breached the agreement with the Tomas/Alcazar thing. GH wrote Tomas into an arc where he may end up being the Gh character of Lorenzo Alcazar. Sounds like a great story, HOWEVER, Tomas was not one of the 7 characters loaned to GH. So GH cannot create an arc that puts Tomas at the center of it, no matter how long it lasted on screen.

If you say thats fine, then whats to stop GH taking Reva Shayne from GL and using that role in story without permission. P&G wouldnt sit & take that. They would Sue & win. You cant take someone else's intellectual property and use it without written consent.



Depends on what they are asking in damages. The court/mediator may find ABC at faulyt but not award PP all the damages being asked for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 725
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Was wondering the same thing, I would believe as long as the other characters mentioned are tied to the 7 loaned, it would be ok. But I feel that is PP's other gripe the the 7 were supposed to be short term & GH writing John just leaving Liam & staying in PC was OCC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's another question: do you believe that another regime at GH might have honored better the terms of the arrangement between ABC and PP (provided, those terms have, in fact, been breached), or do you believe they would have behaved the same as Frank and Ron?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think another regime would have brought over 3 characters from another show and heavily feature them at the detriment of the show itself. I could see them bringing in Roger as a new character altogether, but that's about it.

But I think what interests me the most (outside of the ad thing...they may have ABCd dead to rights), I'm interested to see the damages PP sustained for 2 shows that have not aired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

JMO, I feel that once GH started getting good ratings & Praise, they "Forgot" they only could use 7 OLTLers in story & just started mentioning everyone in Llanview. I mean Felix took Hair styling from Roxy. Etc Etc. I feel they believed no one would ever call them on breach of contract cause Gh was a success & OLTL was "Living on" when it really wasnt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Obviously, no.

I didn't disagree with the merit of that idea. What I disagree with is the way they have allegedly shortchanged the actual OLTL revival, and the way in which they have continued to implicitly assert ownership since - with the worshipful encouragement of some of the soap "press". And if it's true they infringed upon their agreement that's a whole other thing.

The GH writers have confirmed they were just waiting for PP to disappear completely to bring on MA, JVD, ES, KDP, FL etc. more often. There was talk of them casting a contract Jack Manning. They were going all in, and when PP returned they completely failed to accept it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fortunately, because Frank and Ron appeared to care not a whit about AMC (aside from Stuart -- and really, you can't say his having an art exhibit to be OOC), I don't think that particular show has anything to worry about. As for OLTL: at best, there might be apparent and unavoidable errors in continuity. But it isn't as if that has never happened before in television. (Am I right, DALLAS/KNOTS LANDING?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy