Jump to content

Tyler Perry's 'Haves and Have Nots' on OWN


KMan101

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Now that we have broken down the difference between "writing" and "screen writing," will someone volunteer to run and tell TP?

No doubt. These days, David E. Talbert and even Je'Caryous Johnson are doing a better job than Miss Perry. And those bruthas have to make do with discarded sets from old, cancelled UPN sitcoms and camcorders they bought down at the pawn shop.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
When I was watching the marathon Jeffrey told Wyatt to take his clothes off. Wyatt said no and then Jeffrey told him to give him a kiss. When Wyatt leaned in to kiss Jeffrey stopped him and told him now Wyatt knew how it felt to be played.

Unless there's anothsr scene I didn't see Jeffrey didn't try to blackmail him into sex.

Lord knows I wanted Wyatt and Jeffrey when the show first started but Jeffrey soon looked thirsty and pathetic! Landon will suffice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
No prob! What just aired was Season 2, Episode 1. All the previous shows before were all season 1. This show is awful. I find myself watching to rag on it with you guys bc you share the pain

yep Im super worried. Its all I think about every week while watching this show when its on the air Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My TiVo referred to Tuesday's episode as Season One, Episode Twentysomething. I guess my cable provider is not getting the right info? I checked Wikipedia and according to their listings, the episodes that aired January through March were part one of season two, and this current stretch of new shows is the second half of season two, and will end during the last week of July.

Overall, that was a very ho-hum episode. And painfully slow, long drawn out scenes. But that's pretty much redundant to complain about at this point.

I'm glad to see Peter Parros' character grow some balls and put his foot down regarding Veronica's actions towards Jeffrey. I'm guessing by the finale, he'll be getting down with the swirl and bumping uglies with the stiff, white campaign lady.

BTW: Tuesday's premiere earned 3.1 million viewers.

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Of course it did. Between the hate-watchers, the ones who are happy to see any series with AA's, and the ones who genuinely believe it to be a fantastic series, I'm surprised it didn't earn more viewers.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm surprised it didn't either. However, TP better hopes he maintains/build his audience because a lot of people on via social media complained about how long and dull the scenes were in the premiere. And again, he better hopes that Lee Daniel's Empire flops or runs in an opposite season of HAHN because if not, he's gonna lose his audience. Especially, when they'll see a better scripted and produced AA drama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy