Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of March


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Those scenes with Sonny and Connie at his place on Thursday(?) were probably the best either of them have had in this entire horrible storyline, I think. And they both did really well and it was actually very well-written, IMO. Because it was honest, none of the other bullshit or camp or jokes. Even Tess and Jessica on OLTL never really had those scenes where someone told her/them/it to cut the [!@#$%^&*] - Natalie and Brody did that once or twice but it was almost always pitched at a different level, where one character was the victim or both were caricatures. Sonny is a very damaged person with a history of mental illness. He should have had this conversation months ago. It's the most I've liked Sonny in years.

The problem is that those scenes should've happened months ago, and they existed in a vacuum. Virtually nothing else in this horrible story, from the beginning to now, has been treated that way. And it's pretty much too late to make Connie fleshed out, in this current form at least - they never even showed the supposed therapy where she 'learned' she was the host personality. On any other show at any other time we'd have seen those scenes, as we did for Viki on OLTL years ago. That's unacceptable. And that's why they need to promote whoever wrote the other day's scenes to a more powerful position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think all of it is a problem. RH and LW play the hell out of their scenes and I think they put a lot into it, but - putting aside the fact that the scenes are extremely redundant re: his stories with Blair and Tea in the 90s - the material is written for characters who, like Todd and Blair/Tea on OLTL, have been together for at least a year or five years, ten years and have a wealth of experience with each other. In reality, Todd and Carly had sex and were 'together' for maybe eight hours; as you say, they barely talk about each other's lives or histories. They have never honestly discussed the Blair, Jax, etc. issues - or Sonny, for that matter, who was a constant stumbling block in Carly's long relationship with Jax, and who her bond with ultimately tore them apart. But regardless, Todd/Carly treat each other like they're Barbra and Robert Redford in The Way We Were. That's why it's false. To use horrible geek video gamer parlance, RC's team basically wants to import a save game - they want to apply all that history and just slap it onto Todd and Carly.

I could be actually torn re: these two, given the halfway-decent chemistry (which I still don't think is as hot as Laura's with Sean Kanan, but that's another story) if they wrote something new for them, some new way of relating to each other and reacting that wasn't just replaying Todd's best vintages with no actual background to draw from. Take crossovers in general: I was re-reading Harding Lemay's book, and I'm fairly convinced that when they moved the character of Robert Delaney from spinoff Somerset to Lemay's Another World and put him with AW fan favorite Lenore (Susan Sullivan) they didn't just reheat either character's popular material from their much-beloved prior pairings on their respective shows. They made something new, for the then and there, the here and now. GH is not doing that with Todd and Carly, and due to that weakness as well as having A.J. on the scene, they make Todd and Carly into the 'boring' option for Carly. That should not be possible with Todd Manning. That's why it fails. It's redundant, it's bland, and the rehash and the laziness insults my intelligence. It's not the actors. I don't mind Roger Howarth doing comedy - he's always done some of that. It's that there's nothing else the rest of the time but vanilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well. She was never a FrankenRon pet.

I disagree. Love Julie. She hasnt been written for since the hacktini arrived. But I totally see Marcy/Emme whatever being the new focal point. Ron and Frank are the biggest fangurls ever. It's how they roll. Let's see. It wont be the wonder that is pickle relish. Maybe Wolfe will make another appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And yet you think the same writing works for John and Sam. John doesn't know Sam screwed both her sister's fathers. John knows nothing of Sam's history of sleeping with men to con them. Sam doesn't know that John's father died when he was a teen Rafe's age. Sam doesnt know that john has a history of rescuing damsels then ditching hem. But you accept that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not familiar with Irna's timeline of comings/goings, but I got the impression Neil Wade was written off circa 1967-1968.  (And I might be jumping to conclusions, but I also felt maybe the character was jettisoned because Rosemary Prinz was leaving?)   I know who Doug Cassen is, I think.  Wasn't he one of Claire Lowell's husbands?  They didn't mention Neil was his son.  But clearly there was a LOT unmentioned in the short synopsis that I was reading.  
    • That makes sense. Rauch did like to play games, as shown with some of the antics with the Labines. We should make some screencaps.  I can imagine her not being thrilled by much of anything in 1996.
    • I believe he also turned out to be Doug Cassen's son. I could be wrong about that. Yeah, he doesn't get talked about much in the history books. 
    • Cady McClain said the same thing with her hairdos - she switched it up so much because she was either unhappy or bored.  Kim must have been unhappy in 1996 because she has so many different short styles, it's wild (haha).
    • She definitely was trying new things with her hair and makeup in the 1986 scenes I saw so it tracks. Rauch wouldn't have been there, but it just strikes me as a conversation Rauch would have had with her with when he was at GL. Rauch loved to badmouth JC. So she put it in the book as if she had been told at the time. It's like how she has Michelle Forbes on GL years before she actually arrives or Ellen Wheeler firing people who had been fired yrs. before by Rauch or Conboy.
    •   From what actors have said, Y&R has been very busy taping the upcoming storyline, and that was up to and including the week of Diamont's party, and after.
    • Well, a good number of sets were up when I was there, but there was a limited number of people around. Even Y&R seemed dead, but maybe everyone was out for lunch at the time? I remember driving from the parking lot and preparing to enter the roadway when I saw Michelle Stafford and Christian LeBlanc returning from what I think was their lunch break. Not sure where they went or were coming from.
    • A scene I cannot wait to see. Julie Harris as Liliemae is the gift that keeps on giving; she's not outright evil, but frustrating, and in her own way, still pretty lovable.
    • Kim used to say that you can tell when she was unhappy because she would try weird or new things with her hair.  I don't think Rauch was at OLTL at the time Zimmer was but their producer at the time probably wasn't much of a peach either. 
    • I wonder if less set use was preparing for the move. They probably were preparing for this for awhile now 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy