Members Angela Posted February 12, 2013 Author Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Going from the last few years thank to B&E and in a larger sense Pratt, it would kind of be Zach. Frons, Pratt, people with power. The past is the past though and this is not ABC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members All My Shadows Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Frons had pets, and Zach was one. Kendall was another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members KMan101 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Ryan. Kendall. Greenlee. Zach. All pets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Why do I feel like the character in question could be Natalia? Shannon Kane never outright said she wasn't doing it, I think she's retweeted things about it a few times on Twitter. And she lives in NYC. I could be wrong but you never know. EDIT: Look what I just found! Shannon Kane @ShannonKane86 Call All My Children up and close a deeeaaaaaal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Angela Posted February 12, 2013 Author Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Good find ... and from last week. I'm surprised she would want to do AMC (if that is what she is saying) considering she was having some film success while on the soap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 If the filming schedule allows for flexible schedules for other projects, I think most of them would be open to it at least, especially if they're based on the East Coast. Angela, does it sounds like the character in question could be Natalia? Is anything said about her personality or relationship to Jesse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 For me, the "deal breaker" on that spoiled story will be about how the woman in question is written. If she's smart and strong and fighting back, it could be interesting. If they make her a typical soap damsel, it will be...unfortunate. ETA: Dear Lawd, don't even tease me with the thought of seeing my beloved Shannon Kane/Natalia again. And in a real story? *faints* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ~bl~ Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I would be excited if it would come to pass re: Shannon Kane especially if they actually wrote for her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alexisfan07 Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 My three soap goddesses of the last few years are Amanda Setton, Shannon Kane and Shenaz Treasury. And now I might see two of the three of them again? You may faint but I definitely will. Honorary mention to Melissa Claire Egan. Goddamn, was she fantastic. She just wasn't really 'on' the show by the end so I didn't include her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Angela Posted February 12, 2013 Author Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 At one point... But, really, all soap heroines (and anti-heroines) are written like this ... until they just aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members marceline Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 I'm not familiar with Setton's or Treasury's work although I do remember seeing the excitement around both actresses and their characters. But you and I are likethis when it comes to SK and Missy Claire. True but this is the chance to break that bad habit. These reboots are the opportunity to learn from mistakes. I'm keeping my fingers crossed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Angela Posted February 12, 2013 Author Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 What I enjoyed most about AMC until McTavish's last exit is the show was always so filled with all different level of bitches. I don't mean bitches with a bad connotation. I loved it. Soaps by nature were built more for a female audience and I loved that the females on this show were mostly shown as fierce beasts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Darn Posted February 12, 2013 Members Share Posted February 12, 2013 Ew. Forget the race issue for a minute (which most people love to do even though it's absolutely significant but I won't even get into that right now), if this is true then we're still basing stories on the sexualization of young women. Actual young women, their (alleged) target demo, don't want to see this. Gay men don't want to see this (we (well, I do) like our women strong). Hell, normal straight guys don't want to see this! It's really maddening. You can write stories without dehumanizing women. If this is what we're getting what is the point off watching? This isn't progressive at all. I really REALLY hope these sides are just to gauge the actors ability to play various emotions and not their intention with the storylines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members SFK Posted February 13, 2013 Members Share Posted February 13, 2013 Precisely what I was thinking re: the AMC spoiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Dee41 Posted February 13, 2013 Members Share Posted February 13, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.