Jump to content

SOD - Days Tragedy


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members

How in the world will Nicole explain Jennifer "killing" her unborn child? Will she fake some accident, a la GUIDING LIGHT's Annie, making it appear as if Jennifer caused her to miscarry?

Id bet Jen sets herself well for this fall, and Nicole - being who she is - lets it all fall where it falls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think there will be a twist. I don't think the baby is as dead as they'll make us believe. Shawn Christian has said in many interviews that Daniel will be fighting hard to protect Nicole and her baby from the DiMera's when talking about the fall.

Oh, and which Days alum has penned a "tell-all" memoir?

I believe it is Susan Seaforth Hayes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know that this is only a story an ingenue can play. Didn't GL's Annie accuse 40-something Reva of killing Annie's unborn baby?

Reva was written as an ingenue at that time. Kim Zimmer, love or hate her, managed to pull that type of writing off. Reeves can't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

good. The new regime (?) realized that giving Nicole a baby + tying her to EJ was a STOOOOOPID idea. I'm glad. Too bad this SL is only being used as a foil for boring Jen/Dan. I can't.

Its not. There are many more elements to this. In fact 3 that i know of that spring up within a month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I'm aghast at the idea of Nicole losing ANOTHER baby, I reeeaaaalllly think it's time to pull her the hell out of EJ's orbit. And I think that her having his baby was a bad, bad, bad idea. Sami already has two of his kids. We don't need him running around after Nicole and her baby too. It was getting ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
And I think that her having his baby was a bad, bad, bad idea. Sami already has two of his kids. We don't need him running around after Nicole and her baby too. It was getting ridiculous.

True. But the fact that Nicole suffers another miscarriage, IMO, trumps the fact that this baby would have tied her to E.J. indefinitely. Then again, I shouldn't be surprised that DAYS chose a disagreeable solution to a no-win situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Giving Nicole a baby was a bad idea, but repetitive stories are even worse. Nicole just had a dead baby story and it was far too soon for a sequel. They should have just gone through with it and given her the damn baby already because all this means is after a year discussing her dead baby she will get pregnant again and have yet another miracle pregnancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy