Jump to content

AMC: Confirmed


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Oh boy, this is awful.

Why must soap writers today come along and undo all the history of a show simply to further their own ego and agenda? Some things should just stay as they are. And I'm talking about all soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wow. Well, I guess it goes along with cutting the evil out of someone by eliminating the tumor.

And you could say, just for fun, that it's a whole new kind of legendary storyline. It was the first major abortion story, now it's (possibly) the first embryo transplant storyline. Which, to be honest, I didn't know was medically possible (I know they can implant embryos when fertilized outside the womb, just didn't know they could take one out and swap it). So, y'know, I'm learning from the television, too.

I'm just kidding around. They really could have found something else to do with Erica besides long-lost unknown child. It's not too late for them to undo this, though. Get all the drama they need from it and then throw in a twist, sorta like they did with Di.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I stated in a post before this just stinks. I am not happy about it at all. I have loved AMC for years, but have been really disappointed with it for about 6 months or so. This is just a really rotten straw added to that. I too doubt that Agnes Nixon has any influence on the show and it is clearly seen here as I don't feel that she would have let this happen.

I know that some are happy about it in that we are getting another Martin and a tie to history. I could get excited about it if there was a writer who wrote for the Martins, but McTavish never does and never has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, no soap will probably be as good as it was 20 or 30 years ago. But I'm thinking this -- if it's so easy for McT to change history, it would also be easy for a new writer to undo her changes. Let's say McT is fired, a new writer comes in and says Josh isn't Erica's kid after all -- Dr. Madden (in his crazed obsession with La Kane) tampers with DNA, making it look like his son Josh is the child Erica supposedly aborted. He did this all to make a link between himself and Erica (he raised Josh and he's Erica biological child).

I hope that's what will happen after McT leaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Someone mentioned starting a campiagn. We've been campaign against this disgusting, vile storyline for almost week now, at another board, and I thought since so many people feel the same way here, that I would make sure everyone knows where and who to write.

I acutally have a list of email and snail mail contact addresses for a number of pro-choice groups, if anyone is interested, you can email me through my profile. Or if I'm allowed, I can post if here you'd like.

We can change this, or at the very least, make some heads roll, possible cost a few jobs. This is the lowest AMC has ever sunk, and I won't stand for it.

TBTB Email:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

(Frons' boss, if we want to change this we have to go over his head)

TPTB Snail Mail:

Anne Sweeney, Co-Chair

Disney Media Networks Division

500 S. Buena Vista St.

Burbank, CA 91521

Brian Frons

President, ABC Daytime

2300 Riverside Drive

Burbank, CA 91506

Julie Carruthers

Executive Producer

"All My Children"

77 West 66th Street

New York, NY 10023

Megan McTavish

Head Writer

"All My Children"

320 West 66th Street

New York, NY 10023

Susan Lucci

c/o AMC ABC TV

77 W. 66th Street

NY NY 10023

Comment lines:

ABC: 818-460-7477

Then press 4 to leave a message

ABC Daytime Feedback Line (212) 456-1000

ABC Producers (818) 560-1000

Mags Snail mail:

Soaps In Depth

c/o SPEAK OUT!

270 Sylvan Avenue

Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Soap Opera Digest

261 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10016

Soap Opera Weekly

261 Madison Avenue

New York, NY 10016

Email:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're welcome! :) If you know anyone who is outraged by this and wants to write, please don't hesitate to pass on the contact info. The more noise we make, and the sooner we make it, the better.

We started the really active campiagning at SoapCentral's AMC board, but basically there's a lot of pissed off people at just about any General AMC board you can find, so I've been posting there lately.lol :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but some problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
    • I skipped most of Daniel too. I think it's awful he has kids with Nicole, Csrky5 and Chloe and Brady, Bo and Philip do not. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • A great day. Feeling happy and accomplished.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy