Jump to content

GH: Discussion for the Month of April


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Not to mention it's basically taken as psychological fact now that DID almost always stems from severe sexual trauma, which just adds an extra bad taste here--that was the whole reason why Malone/Griffith claim they decided it was fair game to delve back into Vicki's DID in the mid 90s on OLTL--whether you hate the Victor rewrite (though he was already a sexual creep in his 80s rewrite) or not, it was partly as they felt they should address what people now more firmly understood about the condition. Even Higley, in her ugly way, did that with Tess/Jess and the beyond creepy child pornography story they gave her (again it's a subject I don't think soaps absolutely shouldn't touch but when you have to include scenes--with sound effects--of her parents watching the TV aghast--which is ridiculous anyway there's no reason, as the show claimed, that the parents would have to watch that to understand the condition)... So I dunno if RC is gonna give some even more traumatic reason for the Connie split or if it's still just this "part of me knows I shouldn't date a mobster" plot...

I seem like the big Kelli Sullivan defender here, and I guess I have been, but I do think that, as others mentioned, the directors and FV as EP (as well as the writers to a degree) are also responsible for how OTT her performance is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, like PsychoMarty. I loved that in the OLTL Farewell Magazine Susan Haskell actually said she wouldn't miss Marty anymore because she was so pissed off at the way they had her exit, she couldn't wait to finish that material.

I forgot she replaced Sutton. I'm not saying her acting on GH is good by any means, but the woman does have talent and I blame the directors and writing at least as much as her. It is true that someone with real soap experience, like Robin M is doing much better with her OTT material.

Exactly. I mean I'm a big True Blood fan, and 70% of that is pure camp, really. But the writers have always said it's meant tobe a pulp show.

I get what Carl has been saying (and others)--the fact that RC in particular does seem to think he's doing really brave drama in his interviews, goes on about how families are the center of soaps, etc, just makes it all the more off putting. Add to that that we did have to put up with (and continue to) years of Nelson B, Daytime Confidential, etc, telling us that his writing on OLTL was what a true soap should be, how it had all these groundbreaking elements and issues it dealt with, etc... That's not really his fault, but it still makes it all the more off putting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually could see Ron Carlivati fitting in well on a show like B&B. He loves his camp and comedy and crazy women and thats what works for that show. He'd be able to do a little bit of serious drama here and there, but mostly focus on what he enjoys. I also could see him at DAYS. Those shows seem like natural fits for his writing type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They already did a story where Ridge raped Brooke (and Caroline) out of love. He wouldn't have any material.

I guess we could get some "comedy" of Hope having a crazy alter and having her talk like Rizzo and then having her get raped out of love. And then Steffy would pass a baby off as another man's and have months being taunted by Pam over and over and over.

He writes for parodies of parodies. Not soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I actually don't mind Dante (IMO, every soap needs a regular and good guy and he fits the bill), I'm with you about that hoodrat. Then again, I haven't liked her since the day she stepped foot into town to "call Connie out for forgetting her roots" or whatever bullcaca Guza was trying to sell so that they could cut The Real Kate Howard down to size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
    • Roger's return storyline may have been silly but Roger's return was what lead to GL's last golden era.  It was the combination of Roger's return and Robert Calhoun becoming EP that got GL to finally hit it's stride after some really bad years. It will always disappoint me that the ratings during Robert Calhoun's run didn't reflect the quality of the show.
    • He also gave some of the best episodes, like the episodes surrounding Doug's death. The problem with Days was that Ron had a horrible vision from he top. I don't feel the same for MVJ and nothing that has happened in all these months suggests she doesn't have a handle on the show. Now if it becomes an issue I'll acknowledge it, but I'm not seeing it so far.
    • Jean Hackney was awful and that lead to Ben's exit story which sucked. I liked Ben/Val together. Val's love for Ben was that of a grown woman moving on with her life and Ben's love for Val made him willingly decide to raise another man's children as his own.
    • It wasn't just a GL thing, it was an 80s thing. Opulent party scenes on soaps were very big back then. Even in regular episodes where people are just going to dinner they're dressed up like they're going to see royalty.
    • Just started the May 27 episode and first thing I see is that Willow got an ugly haircut since hte last time i watched   I dont have the context for how everthing went down but I know its all Lulu's fault which make her a bish for what she did to Gio
    • I'm pretty sure he was. But point taken. GL really had a thing for masked and costumed balls/parties in the '80's. Everyone looks fabulous, but those poor costume designers.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy