Jump to content

Lifetime to remake "Steel Magnolias" with all black cast


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't know if it is that black women can't have the same type of emotions or rather that black women can't get the same type of roles. At the start of this thread someone mentioned Pearl Bailey doing an all-black version of Hello Dolly. Pearl Bailey was a true talent, a great personality, a fine singer and a good actress. Dolly was white. So why not remake it to showcase the talent? It is 2012 but there just are almost no roles for women, let alone black women.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's totally mu fault for prematurely commenting. My thoughts weren't formulated well. I've been reading about and listening to too much race talk (Tyler Perry's fans vs. Spike Lee's fans, Gwyneth Paltrow's tweet, Dyson overload, etc) and I should have done more thinking before I decided to type.

This wasn't directed at you or SFK. I was making a generic statement about society in general. You do raise an interesting point about churches though. I understand why American churches were segregated historically but other than for geographical reasons, I don't understand any religion that uses the Bible as its guide being intentionally segregated. My take though is that people become proficient at imitating or passing down. If a kid sees a service conducted a certain way then gets older and decides to follow that path, he's more likely to carry on what he is told is a tradition. It's kind of like singing. Some singers sing melismatically because they "feel" it and some do it because they're imitating their favorite singers.

I don't, for example, know if competing dance crews really antagonize each other like thugs or gang members but dance movies give that impression. What are the chances that there are kids who see some of these movies and think that's the way they are supposed to act?

I'm good with people being who they are. I just don't care for someone trying to insist that a character like Claire Huxtable is less black than a character like Nikki Parker. There's plenty of room for both. I'n not a fan of Tyler Perry but he does what works for him and his viewers/supporters. I've seen attacks on him claiming that he's set black people back centuries along with the black women on the VH1 reality shows. Those women only represent themselves.

Thanks for clearing that up because I was thinking I must really be worse than I thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've already said that I commented prematurely. I didn't formulate my thoughts on the topic.

I don't agree that there are no roles for women though because Lifetime seems to churn out movies on a regular basis. They could probably cast a variety of women in those movies because the characters are so generic for the most part. The fact that they choose not to is another thing altogether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Members

The first movie is no engrained in my mind that nothing could live up to it. Several of the performances are very wooden (Queen Latifah and Condola Rashad mostly.)

Condola's diabetic seizure was NOTHING in comparison to Julia Roberts. You can barely tell anything was even going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This movie was a disappointment. I do think casting was an issue with a few of the roles but I think the major flaw was the direction and the fact they elected to play these characters as just "ordinary people" to give the film a more contemporary and realistic vibe. That's what Queen Latifah, who was the executive producer of the film, said they were going for. Part of the charm is yes, these are ordinary women but they were portrayed almost larger than life in the studio film, and it gave the film and characters a certain charm . The 2 highlight performances were Alfre Woodard and Phylicia Rashad, and even their performances were very toned down. I didn't believe the connection or closeness of this group of women. I think aside from Woodard and Rashad, the rest of the cast lacked real chemistry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree....specifically about Phylicia Rashad. She was the best part for me. When I first heard they were doing this and they listed Rashad and Latifah as two of the people in it, I thought of Latifah in the Dolly Parton role and Rashad playing M'Lynn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also agree, and especially about Rashad. Her Clairee rung the most true to me and I had the easiest time adjusting to the transition to her from Olympia Dukakis. AW didn't let it rip quite like Shirley MacLaine, in both the case of AW and PR, I felt that there was "a cap" on their performances and they didn't play the material as broadly as the writing gives it breadth to. I actually thought Condola was quite good at parts, her line delivery was very smooth and believable and then there'd be a moment (like the seizure) where things just sort of fell flat in comparison to the original movie. I've seen comments about the lack of the funeral scene, but that scene (and the entire play for that matter) happens in Truvy's shop in the play. The cemetery setting was the original film's invention.

The all-black casting did not hurt the piece at all. What hurt it was the fact that the script is delightfully quotable and you just cannot hear all of those bon mots repeated by "imposters". If you grew up watching the original, you knew the lines before they even came out of these new actresses' mouths. To be fair, I am sure that this is an issue for every fan of the film who has ever seen the stage version. It was on Broadway again a few years back, and I bet a lot of folks felt the same (plus there's the fact that everything in the play takes place in the shop and the male characters are all referred to off-stage).

I've never seen a stage production of Driving miss Daisy, but i have a feeling I would feel exactly the same. It was on Broadway last season with Vanessa Redgrave and James Earl Jones, and yet, I bet I still wouldn't be able to shake Tandy and Freeman' voices in my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Days of our Lives S60E204 – Thursday, June 5, 2025 Okay, today’s episode was kind of boring. It was nice seeing Jack and Jen back, but they wasted an entire episode on Jen chatting with Julie - one scene would’ve been enough. Also, why didn’t Jack and Jen go comfort Marlena? And wouldn’t a flashback with Jack, Jen, and John have been great? Maybe something from the Cruise of Deception era? Bottom line - it feels like once John’s memorial is over and the returning fan favorites leave Salem… the show’s going to be dull again.
    • Everything with Elon and Trump is a stunt. If people, and the sycophantic press, are talking about their "feud," they are not talking about Republican plans to gut Medicare, Medicaid, and the ACA. 
    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy