Jump to content

AMC: LaRue & Gellar's Return...


Recommended Posts

  • Members

If the last 2 weeks have been rewritten how would that impact anything we are seeing now? I always had the feeling the SMG stuff was a last minute thing and they tried to fit it in. Personally Maria coming back I see as pointless. Why. At least SMG could have done some tongue and cheek stuff with Lucci and Menshew. Who cares about the Buffy stuff. But I get the feeling if AMC didnt try and fit all these people in who wanted to return the fans probably would have been complaining about that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I think it's been way more than two weeks but honestly things started getting choppy once they began to cut things to add DIxie scenes. From then on it's been a snowball effect. More cutting scenes, more rewriting, sloppier continuity...some of it has been because of the compressed timeline, some of it has no doubt been because of PP "interference" for lack of a better word. It would take a miracle to tell a decent story under these circumstances and, sadly, AMC ran out of miracles a long time ago. At this point they could stop running episodes right now, just concentrate on the new version and it might be better for everyone involved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. This is a case of, "Damned if you do, damned if you don't." Which is why I felt AMC should've just ignored all that and concentrated on wrapping up everything as nicely as possible. Forget all the dream returns, special tributes and last requests. Just end this [!@#$%^&*], thank the fans for watching, ask them to keep doing so online, and move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they should've gone with the fan idea I read on TWOP - have SMG play "Young Erica" giving birth to Kendall in the 60s. That would have been extremely poignant.

Wasn't that what you wanted? "Let them burn!"

Yes, I think AMC's ending has been particularly screwed with due to their timeframe - they had very little time between the September exit and PP's announcement and as such a hatchet has been taken to a lot of things. OLTL is apparently also undergoing revisions, but they have much more time by comparison. But in the end, if what emerges next years is an overall better soap opera bearing the name of All My Children, I'm not going to fret about a sloppy ending on a network that has treated these shows like [!@#$%^&*] for years. I am extremely excited about OLTL's prospects in the new medium and I hope AMC has much the same. They're not supposed to be "safe" or "the same."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I knew from the outset of the Prospect Park announcement that the final weeks of this show would become disjointed, non-linear, and just downright insulting.

The fact that actors, who at one point were humbled to be coming back to be part of the "final days" are now publically criticizing and making fun of the material they are being given says alot... and nothing good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Eva La Rue can go suck it, for all I care. Although God knows how or why she became popular, her mediocre behind should be glad she caught on like she did with AMC fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy