Jump to content

OLTL: Kim


Recommended Posts

  • Members

from soaps.com

she comes back and she marries rex

Full Story:

Kim comes back claiming she had Clint's baby. Clint doesn't believe her but Rex does. Rex is supposed to spiral out of control after the charges against Clint are dropped (ie Eddie Ford). Kim goes to Rex claiming she has a way to make Clint pay but rex has to marry her. The audience will not know whether or not Kim is telling the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

What a surprise. Kim's return is all about the twitcher.

The only reason I ever tolerated Kim was because of Setton's work with Jerry ver Dorn. She was weak in all her scenes with non-actors like Hunt, JPL, and Fath - her highlight was not being able to cry real tears when Kim's BFF died.

Gigi's death seems to make them think they can have Rex be a big stud. Every story has to be about how he suffers and how he's going to kick ass, and on and on and on.

JPL has tanked this story from the first day and he will continue to do so. Bringing in a cipher like Kim won't change that.

I really wish they had just killed Clint. I don't recognize anything about him anyway, and his only purpose now is to push story for deadbeats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I'm not sure I buy all of this quite yet....

And I don't see it at soaps.com at the moment, do you have the direct link?

Nevermind, I found it...it is not on the spoiler page of the site, but in a thread made by some unknown poster in the message board section, who refused to provide a link to where they got the information from: http://soaps.sheknow...e/board/240625/

Also, the site has listed Amanda Setton several times as having played Kimberly Andrews on GH.....and not OLTL

http://soaps.sheknow.../776/updates/14

Apologizes for being so cyncial, but it would be nice if the person on that message board would just prove where they got their info. from by providing a link....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe Kim would turn on Clint so quickly. I also thought the show made it fairly clear that Kim and Clint had not yet consummated their relationship before her departure.

I have always loved that pairing, and I would actually like to see them have a child together - shades of Trump or Murdoch. The scandal would be fabulous - old Clint with a baby by a lady of ill repute - and it's down-to-earth. But I doubt that's going to happen; I think this is a roadblock as they close Kim and Clint down and re-affirm Clint and Viki. But with the show going on, I think that's a mistake. You can play with Viki and Clint for years, but I'd move them both on - him with Kim, her with someone new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I believe they did....it seems like it was pointed out on at least a couple of occassions that they did not have sex. Plus, there is still the matter of David blackmailing her over something that happened before she had ever even meant Clint....so that will have to be dealt with as well, and makes me wonder about this even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy