Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Jamie Luner could probably carry on a somewhat decent guest-starring, TV Movie run if she wanted to end her run on soaps. But, yeah, her last good run as a series regular was from 1996 to 2000 with Melrose Place, Savannah and The Profiler. She also appeared on 10-8: Officers on Duty in 2003-2004. Before that was the successful comedy run with Just the Ten of Us and some Growing Pains in the mid to late 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I suspect she came on due to Pratt too, but from all reports (not that we heard much from her) she grew to really like the work and cast. So who knows....

SHe was on Just the Ten of Us? (I assume her Growing Pains gig was cuz 10 was a spin off). :o I'm shocked--to be honest I never really knew her pre AMC, I had basically lost interest in Melrose by the time she joined.

As am I--even just one name makes me feel that the rumours that they'd basically dropped any progress with AMC were exagerated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow I haven't seen the show since it first aired (I always forget you can usually find this stuff on youtube) and don't remember her. Considering she was a teen there, she already is very much the same as she is now. All I remember about the daughters was it was one of the few non Elm Street major roles for Heather Langencamp. I don't remember them havign a girl group--I hope they never tried to actually sell any spin off singles from it cuz... they're not great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Honestly, I don't expect PP to issue a press release for every hire.

My complaint with PP remains how they did NOT market TOLN during AMC's finale week. They missed a huge marketing opening by not just hiring Lucci to do a 30 second commercial to check their website for updates!

I feel PP has done nothing to market this move. Maybe they need it all locked down with unions before making it official. But so far their lack of PR is very lacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've credited a lot of the silence from PP to the fact that the plans got out by the NY Post all those ages ago. I don't think they have an operational PR/Marketing arm for TOLN. They're still building up the infrastructure and finance of this venture, I suspect the PR contingent is non-existent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL Well Marls ....I didn't say what she did was "worth a damn" whether you like it or not & whether you think it's respectable ...is up to you, thus subjective.

I simply stated she has in fact done OTHER things where as Minshew really has not. As pointed out Minshew has been been on boxes of hair color and Tampax ads. Budig has been in some of today's most popular PT TV series ....CSI...Castle....HIMYM.....just to name a few. She also has appeared in TV movies and reality TV. Minshew has done......what???........ please enlighten me.

Also I'm very happy for DV.....I've always been a fan but again as pointed out to you DV can't really be considered as one of AMC's leading ladies. And I'm glad she doing alright ....not sure why you stated that as if I down played her or said she wasn't.

RB was in Please Give....starring Catherine Keener, Amanda Peet, Rebecca Hall, Oliver Platt ....it was in fact critically acclaimed, nominated for several awards, including a WGA and did in fact win the prestigious Robert Altman award....among it's other wins.

So tongue.png SURRRRE it's not a Channing Tatum & Matthew McConaheyheyhey movierolleyes.gifwink.png BUT in fact......award wining and critically acclaimed!

laugh.pngwub.png Thank YOU!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

*******

Also Marls .....Just to be clear I'm not knocking the Channing & Matt movie ......Soderbergh has produced some of my favorite movies & documentaries ....not a GIANT fan of his directing but I do respect his work...so I'm truly happy for Denise V. I honestly hope she hits it big!!!

I just wanted to point out that for a SOAP actress ...Budig has in fact done a lot of work outside of Daytime. Quite a bit compared to other soap actors ......I mean your man JY ...whom I also love ....has done WHAT? outside of daytime??? ANYTHING?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is so childish but I'll bite. Without going to IMDB and naming every single little insignificant guest appearance, JY has been on Broadway and had a pretty big part in "The girl next door" (a movie I surprisingly love and not because JY is in it).

Broadway + motion picture > dead stripper on CSI + skank nr. 87 on HIMYM.

ETA: and Jacob did those jobs WHILE he was still on a soap. He didn't quit his day job 5 times to "try different things" or "move on" and then come crawling back when that didn't pan out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What did he play on Broadway? (I'm honestly curious and not trying to be catty--I know he has singing chops, though his pop album didn't really appeal to me). I had no idea he was in the Girl Next Door, and I think I even saw that (it's the weird teen falls for a ex porn star neighbour flick right?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • From the episodes I've seen during the last few months of the shows run, the show wasn't in a perfect nor horrible place.  It was decent. The highlight of the judge story was Ann Flood playing a completely 180 character from her Edge of Night days.  And Stu/Jo having good focus. I think the Ireland story was an attempt to hop on the bandwagon of 80s location shoots.. and solidifying the McCleary's as the second major family outside the Stu/Jo combination family (though killing Suzi off was misguided.. especially considering Terri E had this likable everywoman element)   I also see that Tomlin came back to headwriting again in late September/early October 1985... and the first thing I noticed was the mask was off Sarah and the gloves were off with Wendy.  The two had good antagonistic chemistry.. and Tomlin was misguided killing her off and deep sixing the Sarah/Wendy/Quinn triangle. The alternative for all three proposed by Tomlin didn't seem any better with Wendy being put in a Suzi/Warren redux situation except it was her mother Stephanie and her new boy toy Bela.  The move was plot driven and not character driven. Meanwhile Sarah is killed off just as she figured out the weird Bela/Wendy vibe and threatening to go to Stephanie... and Quinn has this sudden fascination with working class Evie that made no sense.   As Marcia McCabe said during the Locher Room interview she had... she said each EP/headwriter would come in and remake the show and this done too often.   And seeing the episodes from 1983/1984/1985 posted... she's correct in that view. For example, Wendy and Suzi's friendship was threatened by Warren and their mutual interest in him... but that seems to fall by the wayside due to the numerous Suzi recasts. Then a random character Justine comes on.. and the show spends months building her up as the antagonist... establishing a potentially good rivalry with Wendy.  And in fact, Quinn/Justine are tested in the spring of 1985 before she leaves/is dropped.. and Sarah is introduced.  Sarah is a character with no history with Wendy... and the show spends weeks setting the foundation of a rivalry between former schemer Wendy and new schemer Sarah while fighting over Quinn. Then just as the foundation has been laid down.. poof Sarah is killed off and Wendy is sleeping with the man her mother is seeing. Typing all these whiplash changes makes me understand why viewers were confused/unattached the show.... and all I typed was Wendy's situation (we won't even go into the Liza and Sunny whiplashes during that same period of time).  
    • I loved how todays show had so many people mixing it up.    Leslie loving horror films made me love her even more lol Yes and todays episode has me thinking that shes gonna use Ted's newfound love for his daughter to her advantage and try to re win him 
    • The show seemed to burn through the Kendalls considering how many there were. How do you think the show handled them? Why did they tape off? Was it casting issues? How would you compare them to the McClearys? If the show had continued, would there have been a future for the family?
    • Oh and love how Leslie seems fixated 24/7 on her agendas but finds time to chill out with a horror film...
    • I agree. But Timon has chemistry with just about everyone but his character's wife. lol. I love the fact that Bill is so spiteful that he's messing with Martin and Smitty's marriage with what he knows.   Most def. And I love every moment of it with her Blair Waldorf coded self. I'm sure it will loop back around to the triangle soon enough.    I had a different theory on who Hayley is related to, but if her and June turn out to be related I wouldn't mind. Hayley definitely needs something to do other than stalk her husband.   
    • Oh I actually like that Vanessa has an sex addiction (or more to the dangers of it it seems)--there's a lot that they can do with it.  I just find the interactions we've seen with her and the men she roleplays with, always in restaurants it seems, are really weirdly scripted.  I mean I know a bit about roleplay, and this is just weird *that's all I'll say* LOL "The breakdown for the episode was ok, but some of the lines were a bit off (except during the Anita scenes and the Smitty/Bill scenes)" Completely agree with everything in this statement.  (And yeah, actually I find myself enjoying the low-stakes Anita storyline a bit to my surprise.  Far more interesting than just hearing them yet again bragging about how important they were to "the cause" and at all these marches, etc.  Even when Vernon proved such a bad singing--which of course we know the actor who has sung on Broadway isn't...)   
    • Omg...the way that Bill is manipulating Smitty and messing with his words. Oooo that's the type of scheming man I would think he would be.   Not Jacob at Silk Press Sheila's door to take her to the station!!!!    Nice cliffhanger. And look at next week!!!

      Please register in order to view this content

           
    • I'll admit that I've been busy so I forgot to watch last Friday before it vanished off my system. And I actually was not too bugged. lol.   From what I saw of last week, I didn't feel anything for it except anything attached to Damian. Like his scene with Holden. Him listening to Lily and trying to give his job to Holden. And their disagreement was pretty good, ending on showing how strong their friendship can be. And I liked Lily telling Devon and Nate about what she did...and the disagreements that followed. And we know I enjoyed seeing how close (but not toooo close) Damian and Lily continue to grow.    Victor reading Billy will never not be funny with me. Of course, he already knows that Phyllis is on the warpath and that Billy hired Sally. And yet, Billy still he's going to best him? BOY, BYE.   While Chelesa was making good points to Adam, FF material after 5 minutes.   I hope the NEXT WEEK at least looked interesting. lol. 
    • -- That sock on Liam's head is ridiculous. Someone should have thought about how that would look day after day after day. -- We got an entire week of LIAM IS DYING, and it's been as bad as it sounds. -- This martyr act from Liam is too much. All of a sudden the guy has the answers to all relationship problems. -- Speaking of relationships, no one moves from one to the next like Carter...madly in love one minute, moving on the next. Not that I care. I don't care if Hope catches him with Daphne, and I don't care who he ends up with the week after that. I just don't care. -- Today we got Steffy repeating "Liam doesn't deserve this." We've heard the "doesn't deserve this" line all week. I mean, who in the hell "deserves" a brain tumor? This is beyond suckage writing.
    • Dani seems the type that blew through her trust fund before she hit 30.. so she probably doesn't have any liquid assets... and neither she nor Pamela seem like they're money smart. Vanessa seems to be into experimenting.   I think she and Doug both have addictions (his to gambling and her to the thrill of sex and/or getting caught). The breakdown for the episode was ok, but some of the lines were a bit off (except during the Anita scenes and the Smitty/Bill scenes) Bill/Smitty have chemistry.. shame they don't play for the same team.  The messiness if they did. Kat proves one doesn't need a romantic nor sexual partner to have an active role in a storyline.  Though I hope Eva/Tomas/Kat is revisted soon. June and Hayley talk alike, act alike, and even kind of look alike facially.   They better be related or why the casting for both actresses?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy