Jump to content

Revenge: Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 605
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I usually would agree with you but I think, almost surprisingly, Nolan's been far more complexly portrayed than that. He has seemed MUCH more horrified than Emily when her scehemes have gone so far (like when it appeared Lydia died), and has, albeit not very forcefully, tried to sora get her to see what she's fully doing it seems from the start, while granted eager to help her. This eagerness seems to be due to the fact that despite his money, nobody is nice to him in the community or lets him fit in (his desire for a friend, almost any friend, is both pathetic and kinda touching and reminds me of a more extreme version of some outcasts I knew in school who would buy teh rich kids' friendships by driving them to parties in their nice care when they drank, etc). He also feels an obligation to help Emily and to cover up her tactics thanks to how her dad made his career and I believe entrusted him initially with making sure she got the money (I always wonder how much older he's meant to be than her--the actor is 40 but the character is surely meant to be younger--how old was Emily when her dad died in jail?)

So the Tyler thing got to him partly because, as much as he was posing as being in control with Tyler, he did obviously seem to be falling for him (it was more the fact he could never fully trust anyone genuinely being interested in him, granted which Tyler wasn't, without using him but I felt they could have developped that for a few more episodes), and also because Emily did something that personally involved HIM, Nolan, without warning or telling him first--for the first timne fully cutting her out of his game and making it affect him and even his reputation (what little he has).

The New Yorker had a good review of the show that I mainly agre with. It has a typical New Yorker tone, but I like their current TV critic and while brief, by NY standards, I think it's fair:

"

Revenge,” a new drama on ABC, has found its own cunning take on the procedural, with a protagonist as charismatic as Dexter, and maybe even nuttier. The series is based—very, very, very loosely—on “The Count of Monte Cristo.” Emily VanCamp stars as Emily Thorne, who seeks weekly payback on the wealthy Hamptonites who had her institutionalized as a child and framed her father for unspeakable crimes. The show’s signature motif is of someone standing just outside a mansion, eyes narrowed in righteous melancholy. It could be the official soap opera of Occupy Wall Street.

The show’s candied look suggests a camp-fest like “Gossip Girl,” but “Revenge” is actually a full-on melodrama, replete with strong emotions. Viewers may get high on the tablecloth pornography—the cameras swoon and swan over elegant swimming pools and thick marble countertops—but the people in those fancy kitchens aren’t kidding around. They rage; they are heartbroken; they say things like “Every time I hug you, the warmth you feel is my hatred burning through.”

There are standards of quality even in over-the-top TV shows. Just as an ambitious teen show features interesting parents, a truly effective melodrama gives us villains with sad, complicated hearts. As Victoria Grayson, Emily’s nemesis, a charity-circuit viper with muffled remorse, Madeleine Stowe owns this show. One episode began with a severe closeup of her eye, fanned by delicate lines. “As Hamlet said to Ophelia,” Emily’s voice-over purrs (like “Dexter,” “Revenge” is fuelled by its arch narration), “ ‘God has given you one face and you make yourself another.’ ” Victoria’s eyes are sad, but her cheekbones round into a smile as an invisible someone brushes on blusher, preparing her for a photo shoot celebrating her marriage, which is falling apart. The show is full of gorgeous, ridiculous sequences like this, scored to lush pop: Douglas Sirk for the age of Botox.

But “Revenge” is too juicy to write off as junk. It’s got strong performances, from actors who don’t condescend to their flamboyant dialogue. And it has a few intriguing modern elements—among other things, it’s as obsessed with paranoid voyeurism as Showtime’s “Homeland.” Every once in a while, I imagine that Emily was institutionalized for a reason; maybe she’s hallucinating this whole scheme? If she has a dark passenger, it’s probably Bernie Madoff. ♦

Read more http://www.newyorker...m#ixzz1gYrhD8w0 (the majority of the review is one of Dexter which I am 100% in agreement with about why this season has been such a huge let down and why the thought of two more seasons in this direction seems almost like a point to stop watching).

Edited by EricMontreal22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

For those suffering withdrawals, here are the first 10 minutes of the next episode airing next Wednesday Jan 4th.

<img style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src="http://c.gigcount.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.0NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEzMjUwNDE2ODI1NTMmcHQ9MTMyNTA*MTc*MTk5MiZwPTczMDM3MSZkPUFCQ19TRlBfTG9ja2VfRW1iZWRfVkQ1NTE2/MDI5OF9GaXJzdExvb2stUmV2ZW5nZSZnPTImbz*4NjQyMDU3MjgyOGU*NWZhYTExZmQ3NDM3OWI3M2RjYyZvZj*w.gif" /><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,124,0" width="426" height="260" id="ABCESNWID"><param name="movie" value="http://a.abc.com/media/_global/swf/embed/2.6.11/SFP_Walt.swf" /><param name="quality" value="high" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="flashvars" value="configUrl=http://a.abc.com/service/sfp/embedplayerconfig/id/&configId=406732&clipId=VD55160298&showId=SH014195250000&gig_lt=1325041682553&gig_pt=1325041741992&gig_g=2" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://a.abc.com/media/_global/swf/embed/2.6.11/SFP_Walt.swf" quality="high" allowScriptAccess="always" allowNetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="426" height="260" flashvars="configUrl=http://a.abc.com/service/sfp/embedplayerconfig/id/&configId=406732&clipId=VD55160298&showId=SH014195250000&gig_lt=1325041682553&gig_pt=1325041741992&gig_g=2" name="ABCESNWID"></embed></object>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • They're contract; anyone in the opening is a contract player.
    • I was watching an episode last night and noticed that Pictionary is taped in Atlanta. It's just a walk for Chandler to the studios.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • my vote goes to Eden (Belle)! She single handed carried that show on her back !! Best family will probably be The Dingles! I have to say 2024-2025 was a mixed bag on all of them soaps ! But if I had to say which one would be the best I would give it to Emmerdale for Belle/Tom’s storyarc. It went on for too long but at least was written properly compared to others. But I do think Corrie will win best soap for Mason’s storyline  Best storyline… I wish it would be Belle and tom but the abuse story from Hollyoaks will take that 100%
    • I have to push back on this. I just don't believe it. I don't believe MVJ or anyone at BTG operates that way -- seeing a performance in reveal scenes and saying "That actor has to go." If that's the case, why aren't they doing that with other actors? We all know Maurice Johnson is FAR from the weakest actor on this soap. My feeling is that Keith Robinson became available and that someone from BTG wanted him badly from the beginning. I think this recasting was all about Robinson and not about Johnson at all. Yep, and anyone who can't see that isn't paying attention. Calling Brandon Claybon the worst actor on the show is laughable. Tomas, Ashley, and Derek might be recurring, but they're also key characters, so leaving them out of this actor discussion doesn't work. They get plenty of screen time and are on contract. The only way your narrative works about BC being the worst on the show is to ignore the rest of the cast.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Brook Lynn has been working my last nerve for at least 2 weeks. I was so relieved when she blurted out her teen queen story to her grandmother who is the most wonderful person in the entire world!
    • Just caught up and these episodes were absolutely amazing! Ambyr Michelle was soooooooooo good, and I felt so bad for Eva, I actually teared up. I love that Andre was nice to her, that was my favorite Andre moment of the series thus far.
    • DAYS Ruth Buzzi 11-2-83

      Please register in order to view this content

      I don't need to warn you that if you like this & want to keep it download it. Now, isn't she positively amazing?!!! Well, IMO she is. This is only the first episode that I've got her in. I think there will be more.
    • All true, and all an enormous problem on this show. -- The business stories are maddening because none of it makes any sense, none of it has any connection to the real world. As you said, sitting around and discussing mergers, takeovers, and job switching is not a storyline. -- The deck chairs are constantly rearranged on the Titanic -- that's what this show is. Summer, Chelsea, Sally, and Chloe have been in design for how long? And we've never seen ANYTHING from them. Carrying around an iPad isn't enough. BOLD is terrible, but at least they show us dresses from Kohls and jewelry from Amazon. -- I know it's baked into the DNA of the show, but I will never enjoy seeing Jabot and Newman treat each other as if no other companies exist in the entire world. A new magical line of cosmetics is not going to bring down a company like Jabot. -- This is a writing problem, not a budget problem. An enormous amount of cash is not needed to write compelling business stories and show real products. This is writer LAZINESS.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy