Jump to content

Smash: Discussion Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 201
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm a bit late to the party, but I sometimes forget that this board has a primetime section. I was completely annoyed by something while watching last week's episode, which oddly enough has to do with the same issue that this quote encapsulates: I was watching on-demand (where you can't FF through the commercials) and was forced to watch a commercial during Smash for Smash..or, rather, for Katherine McPhee. It was a best-of highlight reel of every character talking about how great "Karen" is. And my first thought was to come to a soap board to complain about it, because it really is the epitome of what daytime soaps have become. (Except I think soaps would never waste precious ad time promoting something that people are already watching. It's the writers' job to tell the audience whom to root for specifically, within the allotted ~ 38 minutes, dammit!) Using a scripted Anjelica Houston line a la "this girl really has something" or whatever the exact quote was is as shameless as when Ryan's Hope brought on Joan Fontaine in a cameo to tell Kelli Maroney's Kim what a great actress she was.

Anyway, I agree completely with those who've said that Hilty seems much more believable as a potential "star," and that Karen is an annoying character.

Really? That's fascinating. It occurred to me while watching the very first episode that Ahrens and Flaherty were the closest real-life songwriting duo to Borle and Messing's characters, but there has to be at least a twenty-year age difference. That's a big deal, when a huge problem with Broadway musicals today is that nobody who's the age of those characters - let alone anybody younger - has had a career anything like these characters'. Not that the real-life Ahrens and Flaherty have, either. The Smash folks have a "hit" show still running on Broadway and another that's close enough to Broadway to be in workshops with a name Hollywood actress and a big producer working full-time on it. Has that happened to any composer/lyricist since the '70s (ok, maybe in London in the '80s)? Have Ahrens and Flaherty even had a show on Broadway since Ragtime, two decades ago? Did they even have another Broadway show before that (I forget if Once on this Island actually made it to Broadway)? Smash wants to be considered contemporary, and they even insert little throwaway lines about what's wrong with Broadway now, so I don't think we should be asked to suspend disbelief on something like that.

I actually think all of the main plot points could have worked - and the characters might be more likable - if the creative team were supposed to be "nobodies," and the real powerbrokers either were more tentative in their involvement or were involved with the show dubiously for their own motives. And there actually are talented actors with interesting resumes who've attached themselves to productions in that New York Musicals Festival (or whatever it's called) and so forth.

I do wish Ahrens and Flaherty had written the music. I think it exemplifies how misguided this show's priorities are that they obviously spent a lot of money producing the show and ended up shelving it for six months because they thought it would help the ratings to premiere it in January with The Voice, but they wouldn't wait for their first choice to write the actual music in a show about musical drama! I loved "Let Me Be Your Star" because it was so ridiculous, but the rest is generic and completely forgettable, and that's how I would describe all of Shaiman's "real" songs that I know. And some of the songs are blatant rip-offs - "Let's Be Bad" was obviously Cole Porter's "Let's Misbehave," and that one Marilyn and DiMaggio fantasy number was "Somewhere That's Green" from Little Shop. Although I noticed that in the montage from the workshop, one or both of the songs were omitted...is it possible the writers were smart enough to intentionally order some rip-off songs that wouldn't make it into the show because the creators eventually realized they had subconsciously borrowed something they'd heard? Somehow, I think I'm giving them too much credit.

My other complaint is that the show seems to jump from one superficial plot point to the next and then forget them. Like this past week, Tom was freaking out that he's dating someone who believes in God, and was shocked when Julia told him that she does, too - which sounds like a recycled Will and Grace script, by the way. But their last show was called "Heaven on Earth," and aside from the campy costumes, we know that it presumably had some sort of metaphysical themes. Surely their thoughts on the matter must have come up when creating that show? And in the premiere, Megan Hilty was shown in a one-sided phone call, visibly hurt that her mother was more interested in her brother's office politics at a car dealership than in Ivy's big break; but then, because they booked Bernadette Peters (and, I suspect, because they wanted to build sympathy for Karen by implying Ivy got everything handed to her), within weeks, they change Ivy's back story to make her the daughter of a Broadway star.

The suggestions that the show focus on being more soapy and campy next season seem to be the best bet, as far as I can see. The basic setup is too trite and superficial for it to be turned into something like Madmen (which I would argue is a soap, and I would also say that its writers did enough research on the history of ATWT to show that they are less dismissive of the daytime genre than most primetime showrunners who balk at the comparison, but nevertheless). The best Smash can do at this point is probably a Melrose Place-esque revamp. I personally would vote for permanent "Special Guest Star" Bernadette Peters to help Ivy pull a Kimberly after one last straw and terrorize everyone who gets in her way from here on out. They could even make tongue-in-cheek soap references:

Ivy: Ugh, look at Karen, her acting is so soap opera.

Bitchy Chorus Boy: Oh Ivy, you only say that as if it's a bad thing because all the New York soaps are gone and you can't make any extra buck playing Nurse # 2 on All My Children anymore.

Ivy: You know, after all of those scenes about switching pregnancy tests, I'm having an idea... (glares at Karen)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me it's a combination of things: the trainwreck/guilty pleasure factor, my love of New York/Broadway (anything that gives me a chance to see Norbert Leo Butz or Christian Borle perform without my having to board a plane or watch YouTube bootlegs works for me) and a chance to watch a show that isn't about lawyers, doctors, crime scene techs or vampires. It's just silly, enjoyable, eye rolling fluff for me. At least until the actor who plays Leo comes on screen, then it's torture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Still when I think about his ego and how he was scornful of so many things that he had to do on the soaps... Now here he is, no different from any other actor doing whatever it takes to advance their career. Eh, good luck to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set it ablaze?). Victoria briefly moved into the ranch after the fire, with Claire, Johnny and Katie, I think? Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole then moved into the tack house as soon as Teriah left. I guess Victoria's children Johnny and Katie would live with Victoria at the tack house eventually? But Johnny and Katie went to boarding school during the school year. Not sure if we'll see Johnny and Katie for the summer vacation or where they would live.
    • Victoria’s previous house burned down.    And I know why characters frequent Crimson Lights 3 times a day for brownies, muffins and empty mugs:   THERE’S PCP IN EVERYTHING. 
    • Today was a good episode, and the week for that matter. I think they've also done a better job with background music. The scenes in todays episode weren't as silent as they usually are in the background and it was noticeable. I think the show has found its groove well and I'm still invested. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy