Jump to content

OLTL: Jessica New Alters Name


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And for the record the rhyme scheme has only further cheapened this knockoff of her mother's s/l. Tess is fine (Viki/Niki) but Bess should have been a play on "Viki" like "Vivi" or something as Jean was a play on Eugenia (Viki's mother aka the absent protector).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And if RC had written that storyline, chances are, "Tommy" would have started seventh grade at Llanview Middle School, w/ everyone in town just going along with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's almost as if TPTB see Jess and all her many alters as a sort of parody of soap heroines. But this ain't SANTA BARBARA, and OLTL's writers certainly aren't that clever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right... Why so much effort into name rhyming when the point was to have an alter that was logic-based, authority figure? Like you said, it could have been inspired by Victoria herself - or any person (or name) that Jessica could have viewed as reflecting a gate-keeper. Oh, well... I guess we can tell ourselves that Jessica's fractured pshychie puts a WHOLE LOT of importance on the rhyming factor. It's something else she can lash out at Viki (Niki) for!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Let's see:

There's "Jess," the "waking self."

There's "Tess," the sexed-up alter whom Jess created in order to deal with the molestation.

And there's "Bess," the so-called "gatekeeper," who is there primarily to keep the others in control.

"Wes," IMO, should be the one who's all about the rage - or at least the one who lashes out at the rest for trying to hurt "Jess" and "Tess." So, not only should "Wes" try and bust up Joey and Aubrey's relationship, but "he" should go after Natalie, Brody, Ford, and even Viki as well.

But...probably not. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

BW can do very good work. I thought the Jess/Tess integration scenes were excellent. I think that she needs a strong director and a lot of rehearsal, neither of which soaps have anymore. Unfortunately, now the Jess Mess is the result of RC's love of camp and lackof skill, BW's boredom with playing Jessica, past writers desire to prop their own pets (Natalie, Antonio, Nash, etc...) and Frons' priapism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Abso-freaking-lutely. They would have fired Bree Williamson and replaced her with the next young teenage boy they want to make happen. The doctors would say that there's absolutely nothing they could do, and everyone would go along with it, no questions asked. God forbid this sh!tty show to live because somewhere down the line, Jessica would rape and impregnate her own daughter.

The issue is that this show sucks. They take serious issues and play them for what they want to play them for. WHY IN THE HELL is Natalie and Joey having scenes with Tess as if she's their real sister? As if she's a real person?

Just get out with this nonsense. Out! And you got Nelson cracking jokes about how Obama should have announced OLTL's safety during the bin Laden speech last night. GET OUT. PLEASE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wish they'd go darker and more serious with the whole thing and do some alters that aren't direct copies of Viki's. For instance say there was the added dimension of other kids that Norman (thank you) abused too that Jessica remembers seeing either in the flesh or in pictures in the hotel room... the girl with the sweet smile and the sad green eyes and dirty brown hair... that girl looked nice but she was dirty and she probaly deserved it... she probably liked it (this is Jessica's little girl brain at work). Maybe a super sweet (sweeter than "normal" Jess) self-mutilating unkempt nice girl who gives sex away like hugs and kisses. :wub: I dunno. Just something... more challenging and original.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not a lot of depth, but certainly more than this new alter of Jessica's. I always forget that Victor was one of Viki's alters. I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to have Jessica morph into Mitch Laurence since they like copying the past DID story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Finland seemed such an odd choice for a location shoot. ATWT went to Greece and later Spain while GL had Tenerife and there were others in that timeframe. But Finland not being a known tourist destination or offering the tropical/sunny atmosphere usually associated with location shoots seems off brand. Maybe they were negotiating a deal with a tourist association and it fell through.
    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy