Jump to content

January 2-6, 2006


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Those HH figures for GH are very interesting. They almost make me laugh (almost, because I stop think at how badly it reflects all daytime soaps :ph34r:). I'm just DYING to hear the explanation. That's the most drastic drop I've seen since Higley's tenure at Days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Too bad AMC isnt really at a 2.2 ;)

Glad to see DAYS #3 in total viewers, #3 in male viewers, #2 in 18-49 viewers(by a miniscule 4,000), and #1 in 18-34 demos. I hope DAYS can keep these numbers after all the other non NBC soaps dropped so much.

Thanks Toups!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

TOP RATED COUNTED EPISODES (for the week) IN BOLD:

1..Y&R: Monday, 1/2: 4.8/6,442,000 (not counted)

2..B&B: Monday, 1/2: 4.0/5,399,000 (NOT COUNTED)

3..Y&R: Friday, 1/6: 4.2/5,364,000

4..Y&R: Tuesday, 1/3: 4.3/5,306,000

5..Y&R: Wednesday, 1/4: 4.1/5,223,000

6..Y&R: Thursday, 1/5: 4.0/5,149,000

7..B&B: Friday, 1/6: 3.4/4,427,000

8..B&B: Wednesday, 1/4: 3.3/4,296,000

9..B&B: Thursday, 1/5: 3.3/4,285,000

10..B&B: Tuesday, 1/3: 3.3/4,156,000

11..DAYS: Friday, 1/6: 2.9/3,912,000

12..DAYS: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.9/3,688,000

13..DAYS: Thursday, 1/5: 2.8/3,669,000

14..ATWT: Thursday, 1/5: 2.7/3,589,000

15..ATWT: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.8/3,508,000

16..GH: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.9/3,507,000

17..GH: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.7/3,502,000

18..ATWT: Friday, 1/6: 2.7/3,485,000

19..GH: Friday, 1/6: 2.8/3,476,000

20..ATWT: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.8/3,436,000

21..GH: Thursday, 1/5: 2.8/3,434,000

22..AMC: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.7/3,420,000

23..DAYS: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.6/3,385,000

24..OLTL: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.7/3,282,000

25..AMC: Thursday, 1/5: 2.6/3,255,000

26..OLTL: Thursday, 1/5: 2.6/3,202,000

27..OLTL: Friday, 1/6: 2.5/3,168,000

28..AMC: Friday, 1/6: 2.5/3,088,000

29..AMC: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.4/2,890,000

30..GL: Friday, 1/6: 2.3/2,870,000

31..GL: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.3/2,847,000

32..GL: Thursday, 1/5: 2.2/2,841,000

33..OLTL: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.4/2,829,000

34..PSNS: Tuesday, 1/3: 2.0/2,586,000

35..GL: Wednesday, 1/4: 2.1/2,566,000

36..PSNS: Thursday, 1/5: 1.9/2,525,000

37..PSNS: Friday, 1/6: 1.9/2,488,000

38..PSNS: Wednesday, 1/4: 1.9/2,396,000

AMC: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

ATWT: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

DAYS: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

GH: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

GL: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

OLTL: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

PSNS: Monday, 1/2: NO EPISODE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
    • Brandon Tartikoff saved NBC primetime. Brandon Stoddard got ABC Tuesday to rebound and put an end to the Aaron Spelling hit factory.
    • Awwwww Brad. I know I shouldn't, but I feel bad for him 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And yeah, agreed that Dante having animosity towards Gio is very forced and contrived. And it also has me concerned that it means the reveal won't be happening anytime soon.
    • God, I love that woman. Another amazing interview!!
    • We can only guestimate based on other characters. Chelsea was said to be 23 in the first episodee and based on Marttin wanting to run for President in the next election, he's about 30/31. Eva and and Kat are somewhere between that  so Id say closer to 25 or 26
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy