Jump to content

Unplayable characters


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Agreed. Nicole changed so much for the better once she got involved with the Kate/Lucas story and away from being a waitress-turned-model with a shady past and no chemistry with Eric. Being a loud-mouth boozer did wonders for the role!

It was when she recently returned that she was finally given a *frontburner* role and really drove story. But she definitely hit her stride as an actress and as a character with worth to the canvas a good decade or so ago.

Word. It's amazing how many characters just don't work out long-term on this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Totally. Nicole worked very well from the Lucas marriage through the Colin Murphy stuff and her marriage to Victor. The character got really weak when Reilly took over and isolated her in that mansion with Brady for months on end, and then she was mixed up with Jan and Crystal Galore and the Victor "murder," and then they just sort of let her fade into the background and snipe at Sami until she slept with Roman on her last episode. I was actually shocked that they brought her back in 2008, because it seemed like the show had totally lost interest in her.

I think Arianna Hernandez comes as close to an "unplayable character" as I can think of. Neither of the actresses was bad, and I think a lot of things about Lindsay Hartley worked for the role -- she was energetic, she's cute, she had chemistry with EJ for sure and a sort of sweet, bland chemistry with EM's Brady -- but the character's backstory just did not go with what was onscreen. I could never make that leap to buy that Arianna had been running with gangs and selling drugs and whatnot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One of the biggest qualifiers would have to be ATWT's Noah. He was brought on for one set reason, and they never bothered to develop him beyond just being Luke's boyfriend.

I loved the initial concept of AMC's Krystal and Babe. The show needed some less-than-wealthy characters who couldn't afford to live at the Valley Inn. I liked all of the little quirks they had at first (BAbe's love for cow knick-knacks, both of them being obsessed with Dynasty, etc) and hearing about Krystal's past jobs and adventures. The baby switch and their increased involvement with the Chandlers pretty much sucked out all of the uniqueness. Insert "suck" joke here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes you did. And may I mention Liz Hendrickson's former AMC character, Maggie Stone? There was no character. It was an excuse to bring back Liz after killing off her initial character, Frankie Stone. There was nothing to Maggie. Not only did none of the writers (Culltion - who created her, Rayfield/Cascio, McTavish) have a firm grasp on who she was, the costume designers didn't either. She wore some of the most hideous clothes and there was no real reason why. Opal's gaudy outfits, you immediately say "yeah, that's Opal." Erica's over the top, sleeveless designer wear in January, you immediately say "Oh, that's definitely Erica." Maggie, on the other hand, wore some really unappealing things which looked like the wardrobe people just said, "we don't really get her, but, just throw something together, see if it works!" Then, after three years of "I'm straight, I'm straight, I'm straight," Maggie's suddenly a lesbian and runs off to Paris with Bianca. I just don't think anybody knew who that character was, and it showed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No character is unplayable. It is the actor who becomes cringe worthy.

GH's Ric Lansing is a perfect example. He started out with a great story and that should have been the end of it. Rick Hearst, for all his fans talk about how much talent he has, is invisible on screen, and of course he fell flat. I imagine his fans on B&B are at this moment saying things like "B&B just doesn't know how to use his talent. He is being wasted!" And undoubtedly that is what they will say about Rick Hearst on every show he appears on from now til the end of time. His talent is worthless because he is as uninteresting as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh GOD yes. And she was one of David's kin! I can't believe they couldn't find better things for her to do. The only time I really enjoyed Maggie was when she was with Jamie before he was drawn into the baby switch drama. i believe that was before she got into an abusive relationship with Jonathan, which was right before she and Bianca loaded up the truck and moved to Gay Paree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good point about Maggie. I think she just stayed because they liked the actress, and someone kept hoping ABC would let them do a lesbian romance.

quartermainefan I really wonder if any actor could do much with most of Ric's stories. They were usually either ridiculous, or ridiculously boring. He was also part of a dumb, and ultimately pointless, retcon, about being Sonny's brother. I never knew the reason for that. It's not like Sonny didn't already have a bunch of enemies who hated him without contrived ties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's a matter of personal taste which is completely subjective. For example, there are people who find Rick Hearst interesting which immediately disproves your theory that he's uninteresting.

As for this idea that there's no unplayable characters, I believe that to be false. I don't know how someone can expect an actor to play a character that has no clear vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then again, the fact that quatermainfan finds him uninteresting disproves of your theory that he is interesting. 1:1.

Someone can expect it because an actor can, if skilled enough, point in which direction to go.

It's just so sad and funèbre. But don't mind me, who cares if I find it depressing or not. :) If you like it, it can stay. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay.
    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy