Jump to content

October 4-8, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I certainly don't consider myself a fickle soap viewer. ATWT made me pull my hair out half of the time, especially at the end, but I was *still* invested (for the most part) right up until the end because at least s**t was happening. Action, romance, suspense (at the speed of light, no less) but I knew whatever crap they put out was going to be entertaining, or mildly engaging. Sometimes it was good, sometimes it was awful--but hey it was consistent.

The same as with B&B, which I only catch sometimes. However, my mother has been watching it since it first started in 87'. She tells me all the time the show just gets on her nerves sometimes, but at others she just can't miss it. For the most part, they've told those types of camp *hit or miss* stories since the beginning--so its consistent. If I turn on B&B, I don't expect to see anything different--its still pretty much about the Logans, the Forresters, and who owns the company this week. Ridge is Ridge, Brooke is Brooke, and Stephanie is Stephanie.

DAYS, on the other hand, is like a totally different show to me now. It has been boring as all hell for years now. To top it off, I barely recognize anybody anymore. Stefano is *severely* watered down, walking around Salem like a regular citizen(???), Vivian is not creepy or dark anymore but a wimpy, whiny cartoon character who lets people like Brady and Nicole get the best of her, Melanie is now the epitome of a stepford wife, Bo is--I don't know what he is really, Sami has become Marlena-lite, Caroline has been reduced to yelling *the hard truth* at everybody, and Victor does more cracking jokes (really good ones though) than plotting. The only person who seems like themselves is Nicole, and perhaps Kate. I never thought we would get to a point where the show focused on two non-acting people like Daniel and Chloe, but thats kinda where we are right now.

This is not very consistent, so they can't ask for me to be a consistent, loyal viewer. This is their fault, not mine. Even though the headwriters might change, they still have the same executive producer (who should have knowledge of the show) so theres no excuse for all these identity changes. If they indeed want me to stick around in the midst of all this foolery, then at the very least tell me a damn good story that is more than just uninteresting people standing around talking, day in--and day out. A little action and suspense goes a long way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree, especially bolded. That was definitely the case for my mom. And she particularly liked soapy drama as seen by her love of the epic TV movies of the '80s, penchanct for keeping her cable box parked on Lifetime all day Saturday and Sunday, and affection for mass market romance novels and weepies like Beaches and Steel Magnolias. My mother talked about getting in on this whole message board thing shortly before she passed, but the [!@#$%^&*] storm bts was never something that interesred her on the level of the folks around here, she just could take or leave whatever popped up on the screen and she wouldn't hesitate to quit taping one of her stories for a spell. Although she loved reading her SODs, over the years I tried to share with her some soap trivia-type books and she really wasn't all that interested ("[her nickname for me], you know you need to give me something with a story. ^_^ ")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The concept of viewer loyalty is a joke. I stopped being "loyal" to these shows when they stopped caring about my viewership. The people making soaps now wasted no time in informing me that I am too old and too dark for their taste. So be it but you'll excuse me while I celebrate your destruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, ChiTownBoi03, a lot of what you say downright scares me. I mean, would you listen to a same song without pause for 376 hours? Over and over again until you go nuts? Watching B&B is the same: Stephanie being still Stephanie is a part of its problem. Actually... Scratch that: Stephanie isn't really Stephanie, she's become a loon of sorts & a sociopath. Brooke has been trashed, Taylor has been trashed, Ridge you can't trash because Ridge is nothing, Eric is the same petty vanilla idiot he always was. Then there's a bunch of these weird people that go in and out of the show and just get ruined every time they return. One really sees no point in bringing them back.

The stories, though, are sheer repeat ad nauseam with a lot of incest in them. Awful. Who in their sane mind can say that Brooke wants Ridge, Brooke gets Ridge, Ridge sleeps with Taylor, Brooke still wants Ridge and Ridge goes back to Brooke for a while, but then again chooses Taylor is what makes a good soap opera?! wacko.gif B&B kind of has two weeks tops of (very) good episodes a year and that's it, but you hate yourself for loving those episodes because they go nowhere and in the mean time usually ruin an important character.

M-W says consistent means, among other things, "free from variation or contradiction". I have no idea how that can apply to any of the soaps, now or in the 1970s. blink.gif Soap and consistent usually don't go hand in hand, except for brief periods of time.

This is one of those weird traits of soap fans: they don't want change (or seem not to want it). People change, they make progress (or the oppositie), but rarely does someone stay the same. That can only be an illusion. So soaps character should change too. ATWT does not need to and should not become a primetime show, for sure, but it must be in tune with the times in a lot of aspects: writing, sets, shooting techniques etc. Since it failed to do so and actually regressed, it died.

Same will happen to all the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its a given that things should grow and change. People grow and change, but their basic temperaments usually remain pretty stable. I don't still play with fisher price toys, I moved out of my parents house, my goals have shifted, I'm more independent--I've progressed. Despite these relative changes, I still for the most part react to situations and adapt to life circumstances the same way as I always did.

It's the same for soaps. Characters and stories should grow, progress, evolve, but the foundation should still be consistent. A soap opera is set up in a way that perpetuates this loyal following. They bring us into this universe with families, characters, and a basic premise in a serialized format on a daily basis and moves at a much slower pace than a movie or primetime TV show. It's not like soap fans are some bumbling idiots forever stuck in the 80s, which your post suggests. We have much more time to become invested in a show, attached to it and its characters. It should grow, but drastic character and story changes seem like a contradiction to the genre.

B&B, despite its faults and audience erosion, still manages to stay above the pack. I suspect due to its foundation and premise remaining relatively the same. Its fairly easy for longtime viewers to figure out whats going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh wow!! Thank you!!! I simply don't reply to a lot of these "oh soap operas show grow or evolve" posts because my biggest question is, grow into what? The genre is doing exactly what it's supposed to do (except maybe get better writers). I will say it over and over again, if the genre is THAT detrimental to anyone's well being, change the darn channel. Stay off soap sites and find something else better to do. The question is it really that hard to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a HUGE Trueblood fan (my username says it all), I visit two boards where there is plenty of beyotching about Alan Ball's choices. Most of the fans I post with see tons of potential wasted and find like on soaps a writer too taken by one character, that the story suffers.

Go figure, in my experience, a lot of the complaints ring the same about AB as I hear from soap fans here.

I posted for 9 years on the old big X-Files site, and even the 4th season which most agreed was its finest hour, saw plenty of complaints.

It's the nature of the boards to rip apart versus praise.

JMO,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Several primetime shows have taken a page from soaps slower, serial storytelling, and attracted many ex-soap viewers. Smallville for example has taken years to develop Lois and Clark as characters and as a couple. On X-Files, fans shipped and shipped Mulder & Scully as badly as soap fans scream for their couples. It took 9 years before M&S became a real couple and many fans hung in there.

The Sopranos was at its most basic, just a much better written soap than Dallas.

Soaps have tried to steal a page from primetime but the reverse is true, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved X-Files. I've seen every episode. Things is, I can't get into watching them in re-runs.

TeamEric, what you said is contradictory. You started out by saying primetime shows have taken a page from soaps, but at the end you said they don't. They definitely steal from each other. Primetime has to tell the story much quicker. Very few primetime shows outlast soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hi MontyB,

X-Files rocked but CC like soap writers, rewrote his own mythology a tad too much those last 3 seasons.

My line should read:

"Soaps have tried to steal a page from primetime but then primetime has tried to steal a page from soaps, too."

The two mediums were once quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. It got a teeny bit confusing towards the end, but it still rocked. My only real complaint about X-Files was that last movie. I don't what happened there. I don't think they really thought it out.

Anyway, IMO the soaps need to get back to basics and STOP trying to fix things. They all could more diversity, but all in all get back to basics. That's what worked best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy