Jump to content

October 4-8, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I certainly don't consider myself a fickle soap viewer. ATWT made me pull my hair out half of the time, especially at the end, but I was *still* invested (for the most part) right up until the end because at least s**t was happening. Action, romance, suspense (at the speed of light, no less) but I knew whatever crap they put out was going to be entertaining, or mildly engaging. Sometimes it was good, sometimes it was awful--but hey it was consistent.

The same as with B&B, which I only catch sometimes. However, my mother has been watching it since it first started in 87'. She tells me all the time the show just gets on her nerves sometimes, but at others she just can't miss it. For the most part, they've told those types of camp *hit or miss* stories since the beginning--so its consistent. If I turn on B&B, I don't expect to see anything different--its still pretty much about the Logans, the Forresters, and who owns the company this week. Ridge is Ridge, Brooke is Brooke, and Stephanie is Stephanie.

DAYS, on the other hand, is like a totally different show to me now. It has been boring as all hell for years now. To top it off, I barely recognize anybody anymore. Stefano is *severely* watered down, walking around Salem like a regular citizen(???), Vivian is not creepy or dark anymore but a wimpy, whiny cartoon character who lets people like Brady and Nicole get the best of her, Melanie is now the epitome of a stepford wife, Bo is--I don't know what he is really, Sami has become Marlena-lite, Caroline has been reduced to yelling *the hard truth* at everybody, and Victor does more cracking jokes (really good ones though) than plotting. The only person who seems like themselves is Nicole, and perhaps Kate. I never thought we would get to a point where the show focused on two non-acting people like Daniel and Chloe, but thats kinda where we are right now.

This is not very consistent, so they can't ask for me to be a consistent, loyal viewer. This is their fault, not mine. Even though the headwriters might change, they still have the same executive producer (who should have knowledge of the show) so theres no excuse for all these identity changes. If they indeed want me to stick around in the midst of all this foolery, then at the very least tell me a damn good story that is more than just uninteresting people standing around talking, day in--and day out. A little action and suspense goes a long way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree, especially bolded. That was definitely the case for my mom. And she particularly liked soapy drama as seen by her love of the epic TV movies of the '80s, penchanct for keeping her cable box parked on Lifetime all day Saturday and Sunday, and affection for mass market romance novels and weepies like Beaches and Steel Magnolias. My mother talked about getting in on this whole message board thing shortly before she passed, but the [!@#$%^&*] storm bts was never something that interesred her on the level of the folks around here, she just could take or leave whatever popped up on the screen and she wouldn't hesitate to quit taping one of her stories for a spell. Although she loved reading her SODs, over the years I tried to share with her some soap trivia-type books and she really wasn't all that interested ("[her nickname for me], you know you need to give me something with a story. ^_^ ")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The concept of viewer loyalty is a joke. I stopped being "loyal" to these shows when they stopped caring about my viewership. The people making soaps now wasted no time in informing me that I am too old and too dark for their taste. So be it but you'll excuse me while I celebrate your destruction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, ChiTownBoi03, a lot of what you say downright scares me. I mean, would you listen to a same song without pause for 376 hours? Over and over again until you go nuts? Watching B&B is the same: Stephanie being still Stephanie is a part of its problem. Actually... Scratch that: Stephanie isn't really Stephanie, she's become a loon of sorts & a sociopath. Brooke has been trashed, Taylor has been trashed, Ridge you can't trash because Ridge is nothing, Eric is the same petty vanilla idiot he always was. Then there's a bunch of these weird people that go in and out of the show and just get ruined every time they return. One really sees no point in bringing them back.

The stories, though, are sheer repeat ad nauseam with a lot of incest in them. Awful. Who in their sane mind can say that Brooke wants Ridge, Brooke gets Ridge, Ridge sleeps with Taylor, Brooke still wants Ridge and Ridge goes back to Brooke for a while, but then again chooses Taylor is what makes a good soap opera?! wacko.gif B&B kind of has two weeks tops of (very) good episodes a year and that's it, but you hate yourself for loving those episodes because they go nowhere and in the mean time usually ruin an important character.

M-W says consistent means, among other things, "free from variation or contradiction". I have no idea how that can apply to any of the soaps, now or in the 1970s. blink.gif Soap and consistent usually don't go hand in hand, except for brief periods of time.

This is one of those weird traits of soap fans: they don't want change (or seem not to want it). People change, they make progress (or the oppositie), but rarely does someone stay the same. That can only be an illusion. So soaps character should change too. ATWT does not need to and should not become a primetime show, for sure, but it must be in tune with the times in a lot of aspects: writing, sets, shooting techniques etc. Since it failed to do so and actually regressed, it died.

Same will happen to all the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its a given that things should grow and change. People grow and change, but their basic temperaments usually remain pretty stable. I don't still play with fisher price toys, I moved out of my parents house, my goals have shifted, I'm more independent--I've progressed. Despite these relative changes, I still for the most part react to situations and adapt to life circumstances the same way as I always did.

It's the same for soaps. Characters and stories should grow, progress, evolve, but the foundation should still be consistent. A soap opera is set up in a way that perpetuates this loyal following. They bring us into this universe with families, characters, and a basic premise in a serialized format on a daily basis and moves at a much slower pace than a movie or primetime TV show. It's not like soap fans are some bumbling idiots forever stuck in the 80s, which your post suggests. We have much more time to become invested in a show, attached to it and its characters. It should grow, but drastic character and story changes seem like a contradiction to the genre.

B&B, despite its faults and audience erosion, still manages to stay above the pack. I suspect due to its foundation and premise remaining relatively the same. Its fairly easy for longtime viewers to figure out whats going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh wow!! Thank you!!! I simply don't reply to a lot of these "oh soap operas show grow or evolve" posts because my biggest question is, grow into what? The genre is doing exactly what it's supposed to do (except maybe get better writers). I will say it over and over again, if the genre is THAT detrimental to anyone's well being, change the darn channel. Stay off soap sites and find something else better to do. The question is it really that hard to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As a HUGE Trueblood fan (my username says it all), I visit two boards where there is plenty of beyotching about Alan Ball's choices. Most of the fans I post with see tons of potential wasted and find like on soaps a writer too taken by one character, that the story suffers.

Go figure, in my experience, a lot of the complaints ring the same about AB as I hear from soap fans here.

I posted for 9 years on the old big X-Files site, and even the 4th season which most agreed was its finest hour, saw plenty of complaints.

It's the nature of the boards to rip apart versus praise.

JMO,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Several primetime shows have taken a page from soaps slower, serial storytelling, and attracted many ex-soap viewers. Smallville for example has taken years to develop Lois and Clark as characters and as a couple. On X-Files, fans shipped and shipped Mulder & Scully as badly as soap fans scream for their couples. It took 9 years before M&S became a real couple and many fans hung in there.

The Sopranos was at its most basic, just a much better written soap than Dallas.

Soaps have tried to steal a page from primetime but the reverse is true, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved X-Files. I've seen every episode. Things is, I can't get into watching them in re-runs.

TeamEric, what you said is contradictory. You started out by saying primetime shows have taken a page from soaps, but at the end you said they don't. They definitely steal from each other. Primetime has to tell the story much quicker. Very few primetime shows outlast soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hi MontyB,

X-Files rocked but CC like soap writers, rewrote his own mythology a tad too much those last 3 seasons.

My line should read:

"Soaps have tried to steal a page from primetime but then primetime has tried to steal a page from soaps, too."

The two mediums were once quite different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. It got a teeny bit confusing towards the end, but it still rocked. My only real complaint about X-Files was that last movie. I don't what happened there. I don't think they really thought it out.

Anyway, IMO the soaps need to get back to basics and STOP trying to fix things. They all could more diversity, but all in all get back to basics. That's what worked best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
    • Not having watched AMC was one of the reasons I hesitated to make the comparison, tbf. It's odd--I feel like I could argue Cassie, Olivia, Harley and Dinah suffocated the show along with Reva the last five years.
    • Laurie and Lance accompany Leslie to her Denver concert and she relies me on Lance for support.Unbeknownst to Leslie, Brad has had the operator make a special connection to the concert hall so he can hear her concert. The Maestro, realizing Leslie’s emotional torment over her failing marriage, tries to persuade her to tell Brad about the baby, and when she refuses, he writes a letter to Brad betraying Leslie’s confidence. After another fight with her mother about how learning about her parentage has upset her life, Laurie confides to Leslie that she feels cut off, outside. Stuart overhears this conversation, and Leslie has to tell him the whole story. She tries to explain fairly how Jennifer had left Stuart and actually only spent one night with Bruce, and faced the truth about Laurie only when she was forced to. Stuart is livid over this |betrayal and wants to confront his wife ‘now, but her doctor calls. Her one-year mastectomy checkup was fine, but he’s discovered irregularities in her cardiogram and doesn’t want her under any stress until further tests can be made. Stuart assures Leslie he won’t tell her mother he knows about Laurie until he can do it calmly, and doesn’t tell his daughter about the cardiogram.  When Chris continues to receive obscene calls, Snapper goes straight to the Beckers’. Ron insists he was home with Nancy, and she corroborates this. When she steps between an advancing Snapper and her husband, screaming, “We don’t have a telephone. He couldn't have called Chris,” Snapper finally has to believe her, and he leaves. But moments later Karen tells Nancy that Daddy went out while Mommy was in the shower. Ron insists it was just a few moments, for cigarettes. Nancy lets it pass, but the next morning finds a whole carton of cigarettes in a drawer  and asks why he went out. Ron coldly tells her she’d  better pull herself together, she’s letting this thing with Chris make her a little insane. Nancy ponders telling Chris but decides that all Chris would do is  badmouth Ron again, and she and Karen have no one but Ron and can’t leave him. When a telephone-installation man arrives with their new phone, Nancy asks him not to put it in. But Ron arrives and orders the installation made, telling Nancy she’s trying to run his life, as his mother did. When Nancy tries to call Chris, Ron frighteningly tells Nancy he’s done  everything they said he did, but it’s all her fault, as she never gave him what he needed. When he informs her he’s taking Karen away from her before she can ruin her, Nancy collapses in a catatonic state. Ron then calmly calls the hospital and requests help for his wife, “Fran Jackson,” who has had a breakdown.  Laurie, seeing the extent to which Vanessa will go to keep Lance to herself, warns Lance that his mother’s possessive feelings are unhealthy. Lance suggests Vanessa will consider Leslie a threat also when he learns that Les and Brad are divorcing and things will get easier. As soon as the hospital attendants leave with Nancy, Ron dials Legal Aid and has Karen tell Chris she’s all alone. Stopping only to leave a message for Snapper about where she’s going, Chris rushes to the Beckers’ apartment, only to realize that Ron’s tricked her. Ron sends Karen out of the room and, after expressing his hatred for all women, tells Chris he’s going to prove to her he’s a man. But Karen wanders back in as he has Chris pinned to the wall, and Ron’s mind snaps when he realizes his daughter has seen his perverted side. After smashing the wall mirror, he runs out, and Greg, terrified at learning where Chris is, arrives to find her comforting Karen. Chris takes Karen home, and after several days of fruitless searching for Nancy, she applies for temporary guardianship of Karen. Peggy and Jack set a New Years Eve wedding date, but Stuart is terribly upset to realize how irrational and incomplete Peggy’s plans are. When she suddenly makes all pertinent decisions in the space of a half-hour, Stuart tells Jack this doesn’t indicate certainty, but rather proves his point—she’s just trying to convince herself that the rape didn’t affect hers and it did. A chance remark by Stuart shocks Laurie into realizing he knows she’s not his natural daughter. When she hysterically screams out her alienation and her innate feeling that she was always 'different' he assures her with tears in his eyes that since they really love each other sincerely, it makes no difference; she’ll always be his daughter. Stuart explains that Jen still doesn’t know he has learned the truth, and he would like it to continue that way. In helping Brad pay his bills, Laurie finds Maestro Fausch’s letter and tells Brad that Leslie is pregnant. Ironically, to get to him with this news, she had to get |away from Leslie, and used a meeting with Lance as an excuse. When ‘Lance arrives soon after, he’s angry that Laurie lied, and she later has to explain that she has been helping Brad. Understanding her motives, — Lance agrees that she should continue to press him to |reconcile with Leslie. Brad, however, still won’t reconsider—in fact, the news makes him even more resolute. But Vanessa has had Laurie followed, and hits Leslie with a double blow. She gives her the report saying this proves her sister is involved with her husband, and then assures Leslie that Lance loves her, — not Laurie. Badly confused and hurt, Leslie lashes out by kissing Lance while he sits with her at the piano. Leslie then waits at the apartment for Laurie, and when she arrives, she bitterly accuses her of having an affair with Brad. Laurie angrily assures Leslie she  was with Brad with Lance’s full knowledge and that Leslie’s anger means she still loves Brad. She then explains to Leslie that Brad left her because he’s blind. In shock, Leslie rushes home to confront Brad, furiously berating him for treating her like a child who cannot decide for herself. But Brad, even with Leslie now aware of the situation, refuses to reconcile with her. When Leslie tells Laurie how unreasonable Brad has been, Laurie suggests that Leslie stop seeing everything from her own angle only. 
    • In regards to the Reva vs Erica discussions... I think there was one main difference between the two characters.... Erica never took over/ate up airtime on All My Children.  While she was a larger than life character, she never took over the show and there were times she was even supporting and not the lead.... while Reva basically suffocated Guiding Light in the later years with her presence.
    • That was such a missed opportunity, especially with May sweeps.  And, it would’ve been a much better story for Naomi/Jacob than whatever’s going on with June 
    • https://www.hulu.com/hub/tv/collections/9979 Amazed! But loving it. What this shows is GH Hulu out of top 15, GH is #2 & this was Saturday. Are we happy campers? Yes, at least for the moment, you bet we are.
    • I forget his name but Tori Spelling and Jennie Garth had the EP on after they didn't understand the 60s flashback episode due to the lack of original music. He felt that was one of his strongest episodes so he came on to explain to them just how much the music changes hurt the series. Basically, they only allowed him to pick a selection of episodes he felt the music was vital and other than that they didn't bother to save the music.  They kept music for prom and things like the Color Me Badd episode and for most of the musical acts but any music you loved from the opening of the show or just music played in random scenes was cut.  I know there are also some scenes cut but I don't know too much about that. The most glaring one was Clare's final scene being cut which is obviously a huge problem for a character who'd been around for so long. Overall I was able to enjoy my rewatch using the DVDs but without all of the original music it isn't nearly as good a show.
    • Too many returns, that's when you know a show has run out of ideas and doesn't care anymore.  Zoe annoyed the sh!t out of me most times, but the Kat/Zoe storyline will always be iconic and close to my heart (that's the era I first started following the show in near real-time), and probably the only storyline in 21st century EastEnders that had long-term value for the characters involved during their initial run together. However, after all this time and the writing choice that Zoe never wants to see Kat again, I think that ship has sailed and I don't know that it makes sense to revisit it at this point. 
    • Former EastEnders star Michelle Ryan is reprising her role as Zoe Slater on the BBC soap following an absence of over 20 years.  It’s been reported that Zoe will return to Albert Square later this year and that she’ll take centre stage in a dramatic new storyline involving her family.  The news comes amidst news of other big returns, which include Max Branning (Jake Wood), Tanya Cross (Jo Joyner), Shirley Carter (Linda Henry) and Ben Mitchell (Max Bowden), who will also be back in Walford later in the year.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy