Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

Maybe she would have? I could see La Hubbard believing somehow that being written as a bipolar kleptomaniac might have made for a sympathetic portrayal. Sometimes an actor's POV can differ drastically from that if a writer's.

Link to post
Share on other sites


  • Replies 11.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2383

  • DramatistDreamer

    1287

  • Soapsuds

    1019

  • P.J.

    648

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ultimately, Liz has been very vague about her concerns about Marland’s writing for Lucinda. She complained he preferred writing for younger characters, and I know she wasn’t very fond of how Lucinda’s origin story unfolded in the early 90’s.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DramatistDreamer said:

I think MTS would probably appreciate a role that gave her something legit to do, something that showed more than one superficial side to her character. Something that showed some type of complexity or depth. 

 

Not necessarily.  On more than one occasion, MTS has expressed how much she loves playing Nikki as a falling-down drunk -- a storyline that Bill Bell was right to eighty-six and sweep under the metaphorical rug BITD -- and hated when then-HW/EP Lynn Marie Latham gave her something to do other than lounge around the Newman Ranch and accuse Victor of cheating on her all day.

 

From what I can see, Elizabeth Hubbard would rather have played the Nancy Hughes role.  But, Liz, honey, even Nancy was a bad bitch way back when. 

Please register in order to view this content
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, lilyredd said:

First post and what a fun thread to read. I watched ATWT regularly in the late eighties early nineties and this lockdown has me rehashing lots of past shows and books. 
 

I am curious why people assume that Hubbard did not like playing the villain? I have not read nor heard her say she wanted Lucinda to be the good guy. Is this from the Locher room interview? 
 

 

 

Welcome

Please register in order to view this content

From what I have been able to glean, it seems as though some interviews may have been out there years before the reunion live stream, but I admit, much of the talk recently stemmed from discussion that came specifically from those reunion live streams.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BetterForgotten said:

I know she wasn’t very fond of how Lucinda’s origin story unfolded in the early 90’s.

 

And I just remember watching that story unfold, with all the flashbacks, and thinking it was so intense and raw and so not like anything that was going on on any other soap.

 

On the one hand, I can see where she's coming from in regards to Marland's preference for writing for younger characters.  But, you know, even Irna liked to write for younger characters, too.  I mean, before there was Luke & Laura, or Doug & Julie, there was Jeff & Penny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marland may have loved actors, but I know Liz was probably the type of actor who could drive him nuts, lol.

 

She openly admitted to only loosely following her scripts on both TD and ATWT and altering dialogue to fit her preferences. While men like Tony Geary have gotten away with that for years, that type of behavior is always looked down on when done by women. Knowing how much control Marland liked to have over the writing, this surely annoyed him at times.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, BetterForgotten said:

Knowing how much control Marland liked to have over the writing, this surely annoyed him at times.

 

Jane Elliot fiddled with his dialogue, too, but, like JE said he told her, he never cared, because she was just too good.  I can't see him not feeling the same way about someone like Hubbard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Every time I read about how much Liz liked to play fast and loose with scripts, the more it floors me that she is the same woman who once dated Paddy Chayefsky, who was notoriously controlling over his work in a way tha Marland could only dream of being.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, BetterForgotten said:

Ultimately, Liz has been very vague about her concerns about Marland’s writing for Lucinda.

 

Well, she doesn't have to gush all over it the way Martha Byrne does, but the implication is always there that, for her, Althea was the "better" role, and that just irks me.  Lucinda wasn't always written well, but even when she wasn't, she remained interesting.  Althea?  I was just glad to see the bitch gone.

 

1 hour ago, DramatistDreamer said:

In her defense, Barbara had been a heroine of sorts prior (so maybe that was what she was comfortable with?) but, by the looks of the character trajectory, the heroine characterization had sort of run her course after Gunnar departed.

 

Well, I do agree that Barbara playing the hapless heroine/victim was getting stale.  Any woman in her position would want to "wise up" after all the agony she had suffered with James, Gunnar and Brian.  But, even after Marland had tarnished her a bit in that quadrangle with Hal, Margo and Tom, it wasn't TOO long before she was back into heroine-ish mode.  And I think that's because, as exciting as it was to see Barbara "being bad," it was also very limiting for that particular character.  Unfortunately, it was Hogan Sheffer who took things a step too far, getting Barbara out of another story rut by turning her into a total loon.

Edited by Khan
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, DramatistDreamer said:

 

Welcome

Please register in order to view this content

From what I have been able to glean, it seems as though some interviews may have been out there years before the reunion live stream, but I admit, much of the talk recently stemmed from discussion that came specifically from those reunion live streams.

Thanks! 
 

I just watched the ATWT 50th anniversary special episode from Soapnet via YouTube (sorry I do not know how to post it here) and Hubbard mentioned how Marland liked to write for young love but when she said it on the show she was very complimentary of him and didn’t sound negative at all. Perhaps, it is overblown as to her feelings on her character and Marland’s writing for her? 
 

I do, however, think Hubbard disliked how the John/Lucinda marriage ended and maybe that and the writers having Lucinda throw herself at John or Gavin Kruger or Craig only to be rejected may have informed her opinions on any love stories. 
 

And it is of note she always seemed to remember that pairing and John after he left the show. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, lilyredd said:

I just watched the ATWT 50th anniversary special episode from Soapnet via YouTube [...] and Hubbard mentioned how Marland liked to write for young love but when she said it on the show she was very complimentary of him and didn’t sound negative at all. Perhaps, it is overblown as to her feelings on her character and Marland’s writing for her?

 

Perhaps.  I could be comparing her too much to someone like Erika Slezak.  In her final years as OLTL's Viki, Slezak often had to play material that was, quite frankly, beneath her as an actress.  Yet, the only times she ever complained publicly about the work -- during the Leah Laiman/Susan Bedsow Horgan era, for example; and later, when Dena Higley was HW -- the criticisms were very much warranted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being that P&G, like most soap production companies, seemed to be chasing the youth demographic, I think most writers on the daytime dramas could be said to prefer to write for young love, because if you don't (or of you seem not to), you might find yourself looking for a new job. In Still, with Bob and Kim having some of the most consequential storylines in the mid to late 80s, Lisa not hurting for romantic pairings, it's hard for me to say that Marland preferred writing young love.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, DramatistDreamer said:

Still, with Bob and Kim having some of the most consequential storylines in the mid to late 80s, Lisa not hurting for romantic pairings, it's hard for me to say that Marland preferred writing young love.

 

Good point!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Free the Oakdale Three!"  LOL!!

 

I'm pretty sure that was Goutman's (lame) idea.  TBH, I thought it had some SLIGHT potential.  Especially with the idea of taping on real-life college campuses.  But, its' half-hearted execution was bound to fail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Tell a friend

    Love Soap Opera Network Community? Tell a friend!
  • Posts

    • I guess a bright red coat is sort of recognizable (assuming it's that one you meant, I haven't watched the show in a while).
    • Next week's spoiler pics. Please register in order to view this content
    • (I heard this on someones podcast so if im wrong, Sorry!!!.) They said GHs Hulu Numbers are like 3X that of the neilson numbers, Jamey Giddens Also said Semi Recently that All the soaps do well on their networks platforms, So i think they will do okay. What about if a daytime soap makes a transition to prometime, So lets say next year Pine Valley gets the greenlight, Do you think that will do okay in primetime or be a flop.
    • In the event that a soap does get canceled today, I wonder what future it'll have on streaming. When Passions went to DirecTV they said it was a big success, but of course canceled it once they got their subscribers, then they moved onto primetime shows. AMC and OLTL were successful on Hulu and OWN, but were ahead of the curve when it came to streaming. Say DAYS does leave NBC, I wonder if they'd consider moving it to streaming. You can't convince me it wouldn't be a big hit. It probably could be what Peacock needs to be saved since DAYS fans would have to flock to it to keep watching.
    • Most networks were thinking about getting out of soaps at that time and Passion was the first that went, then Guiding Light and As The World Turns, then of course One Life To Live and All My Children. The truth is that General Hospital was next to go if they hadn't seen that the replacements weren't doing well (I think NBC ultimately ended up giving up Passions time slot to affliaties, but I might be wrong) and that's what's so far kept the remaining soaps on air. They know if they lift them off at this point they'll not only get replacements doing worse, but also likely affect the rest of the remaining daytime line up negatively. I assume they've figured the remaining soaps DO have a unique audience that won't tune in unless there's a soap on air.
  • Recent Status Updates

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy