Jump to content

The Soapgeist: July 5, 2010


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

• Now that all is said, aired and awarded, ATI President James Romanovich shares with Soapgeist his belief, which I agree with, that his company produced a great show. Indeed. Every daytime star, producer, director, and publicist Soapgeist spoke to raved about “the best Emmys in years.” Though the fans aren’t as enthusiastic. To those critics, Romanovich says:

“Perhaps what many genuine soap fans don’t realize is that the Daytime Emmys were allowed back on TV in spite of the soaps, not because of them. Had we not had a 20-minute tribute to Bandstand (which according to the ratings on the quarter hour was the spike that won the two-time period and the night for CBS) and the Las Vegas Hilton, we would have never had CBS. It would have been over. Therefore, the Daytime Emmys would have been a dinner at the Beverly Hilton. For the daytime community, that’s not a bad thing. It’s still a good, fun night for them. But what the Daytime Emmys represent by being on television is the strength of the content of daytime television. If the soaps have a chance in hell at being looked at as relevant in mainstream America, it has to be [related with what the general public considers] mainstream.”

He adds, “As a soap fan, I’m telling you the sad facts, which is why I have worked so hard to keep the Daytime Emmys on television. The facts are that networks really have lost interest in their soaps. They are not the financial boons they used to be. What’s sadder is that if you poll most television viewers and ask them who Oprah, Judge Judy and Jerry Springer are, they know. Ask them again who Agnes Nixon, Susan Flannery and Maura West are and they don’t know. The soap opera fan alone cannot sustain the Daytime Emmys. Like all awards shows, you need entertainment as that wide net to capture as many fish as possible. If I can do that with some magic and music, while still maintain about an 80 per cent weight to the soaps, then we all win. What I’m hoping to do with the Emmys is prolong their relevance so that these six remaining shows can have a life beyond daytime TV when the Internet and à la carte television options presented to us in the near future is our only way of watching TV. That’s what I tried to do with Guiding Light.”

Romanovich continues, “If we never came forward and produced the Daytime Emmys in ‘09, what message would that have sent to the broadcast networks? Everything we did for the Daytime Emmys had a grand plan and last weekend was it — to make it big, on a top network, and relevant. Was it the same as 20 years ago? No, because the soaps aren’t the same (or as plentiful) as 20 years ago. As one who is doing everything for soaps I can, I will feature Lion Kings, Kabuki dancers and the roster of Motown if that’s what it takes to keep them on TV.”

Really dude? Really? Last year's telecast(which your company produced) was one of the best in YEARS, aside from time constraints. It was a celebration of game, talk, soap, and children's shows. For the first time in years, The Emmys felt like a somewhat dignified ceremony that wasn't ashamed of daytime television. [!@#$%^&*] the glitches and the rushing from last year...That's the kind of Emmys ceremony I wanted, in terms of tone.

If keeping the Blue Man Group, Cirque Du Soliel, David Copperfield, and CATS off the stage and waiting until he croaked and died to give Dick Clark his 20 minute tribute meant no telecast and a dinner at the Hilton, then so be it. A webcast would have sufficed just as well or even a press release and livetweets from We Love Soaps and Buzzworthy. I never thought I'd say that, but it really has come to this.

I had a friend come by to watch the Emmys with me. Her only experience with daytime is really court shows, but she was wondering what any of this really had to do with soaps or with daytime television. She expected more content, to understand why these awards and these shows were so important to their fans.

But of course, I bitch, I bitch, and if they are televised next year, I will still watch. I can't resist a good trainwreck or drunken soap actors no matter who's producing the telecast. But this guy made a colossal mistake trying to justify his continuing to air the Emmy Awards. This year was not a celebration of daytime as a whole. Rushing Agnes Nixon offstage, not televising the children's categories or the court category(let's face it, Judge Judy is poised to be the next Lucci thanks to Cristina's Court), but finding time for crappy dated stage shows does not a celebration make. And this is coming from someone who watches just about everything in daytime.

And also, while we're at it, was the production company that hard up for money that they accepted advertising dollars from Mississippi Gulf Tourism? "Hey, if you can't afford Vegas, our sponsor, get chemical poisoning and oil on your feet on the beaches of Pascagoula!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WARNING! WARNING! WARNING!

The following All My Shadows post contains large amounts of bitchiness.

And? Because the producer of the show and Nelson "Kissass" Branco" say it was great, then it must be true? Keep that, I don't want it.

The CW's show from last year was at least a hundred times better than this year's show, so who cares about "getting CBS?"

Talkin out the side of ya neck.

How is putting on a show like this year's show representation of the "strength of the content on daytime television?" You completely shut out entire genres of daytime programming. I fail to see how adding more and more non-daytime content is supposed to highlight what's great about daytime content.

And "American Bandstand" is currently mainstream? Tony Orlando is mainstream? The Spinners are mainstream? What? Keep that, I don't want it.

If you keep taking the "Daytime" and the "Emmys" out of the "Daytime Emmys," then what's the f'n point of putting the show on TV? Keep that.

But it's not just the soaps, it's soaps, talk, games, children's shows, special class series, etc. This year's show was a middle finger to them all. Was Judge Judy even at the show? I don't think the courtroom award was presented.

Again, it's not just the soaps. And 80 percent? Really? A 20-minute oldies concert vs. a 1-minute ATWT tribute? Keep that, I don't want it.

...what!? I don't even get it. Putting all this extra crap in the Daytime Emmys is going to help out the remaining soaps? What?! If people are only tuning into to watch 20-minute oldies concerts, Lion King performances, Cirque Du Soleil, The Blue Man Group, etc, then how is that going to help the soaps? STFU.

Just shut up. Please. You sound ignorant. Last year's show was perfectly fine. If we keeping the Daytime Emmys about daytime television meant watching the show on The CW with a smaller budget, then that would have been PERFECTLY FINE. I don't think one person complained last year because they wanted the show on one of the bigger networks.

Middle finger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reality of the subject is that the networks and the industry does not care about soaps that is the point he was trying to make. If the Daytime Emmy's is no longer broadcast on a major network and shown as a webcast we might as well just start counting the cancellations that is how irrelevant daytime soaps are to the industry as a whole.

I didn't care for the show but I understood what they did and why it had to be done, soaps is bad business nowadays no one is looking to invest in them anymore and from what Romanvich says the networks are looking for fast ways to get out so if this gives the show one more year or even some added weight on getting online then do what you have to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What's all the hate for an AB tribute? I thought it was fine, and this IS the daytime Emmys, and American Bandstand WAS a daytime show. Granted,it was on Saturdays, but it WAS a daytime show 5 days a week for many years before it went to once a week. For those who are under 25, AB doens't mean much, but it's a HUGE part of our lives for those of use older than that. Now cirque De soilel... that's another story. But oh well, whatever gets it on the air, I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Romanovich is in this to make money so his perspective is understandable. He makes more money if CBS or one of the major networks air the show than if CW does. I don't understand his need to give this interview justifying the show had did relatively well in the ratings and made him profit to Branco. What does he care what a small community of soap fans think? He must be a publicity whore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I suppose it was a bit *long*, but then again, I don't want the hurrying people's acceptance speeches so dumbass Jeff Foxworthy can tell some stupid joke, either. His sh!t is TIRED. And While Chubby Checker and the Spinners were good, something was VERY wrong with Marie. And she is normally NOT LIKE THAT. her voice is usually on point and strong. Tony Orlando... his voice has been shot for years, if they were gonna have him, they should have gotten Joyce and Telma.. he tries harder when he's onstage with them, and they light up the room, while he doens't. He schmoozes too much, and doens't concentrate enough on how he SOUNDS. I would have made it more a tribute to CLARK HIMSELF, and not just bandstand, because considering his presence on Pyramid, his daytime presence is deserving of such a tribute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • BTG: A B&B: B DAYS: B+ GH: A- Y&R: C-
    • I can not see Kat as a police officer and do not want that for her. Thats not her passion nor does she care about that stuff. The stuff with Eva and Leslie is specific to her life and wanting to protect her family. Her "detective" skills have more to do with her business background, which makes her very analytical and pay close attention to details. If this show had a corporation, she'd make a shrewed businesswoman and CEO I definitely dont want to see her sleep with her cousin's husband. That would be too much of a Hayley redux which ironically you dont want with the Sharon/Hayley theory
    • I would make Jan, Ashley's mom, Anita and Vernon's maid. It would lock in to why Leslie would choose to befriend both her and Mona. It also gives Ashley a connection to the Duprees and explains how she befriended Naomi. I would have had Derek start the show as a cop to explain his connection to Jacob. Kat needs to realize that she is MADE to be a detective. Have her go through police training, making the appropriate comments about the uniform along the way. Have her prove she is so much more than a rich princess, even to herself. Then, when Jacob's partner is proven to be dirty, Kat is assigned as Jacob's rookie trainee. At the same time, Naomi does finally get a case she can follow through on. Her client is a person that Jacob arrested. This puts them at odds because Jacob knows this person did it, as does Kat, but Naomi only sees the extenuating circumstances and believes he deserves a lighter sentence and a second chance. THAT is when Jacob will turn to Kat in frustration and she will lose her virginity to him. 
    • This opened my eyes and appeals to my logic. But, don't you also think that the fact that they are so ill-suited means that, by soap-opera-laws, they aren't a long term item?  I like how Belle is written now, so I appreciate the fact that she is in this story.  But, I don't believe anything will become of it, and I think EJ is going to mess it up very soon.  Which explains why I don't get too worked up over it. I'm also suspending my outrage until I see how EJ treats Belle during her mourning.  If he cheats with Cat, then we'll know that he was never meant to be happy.
    • Kristen also raped John post-Paris with a Magic Mirror.  Her pregnancy was "delicate" and they couldn't be intimate.  She had already lost the baby, needed to get pregnant immediately again and set a Stefano tricked out Magic Mirror to hypnotize John and John thought he was  having sex with Marlena.  John woke up the next day and thought it was a dream.
    • The show is only a few months in and still finding it's footing. I'm hoping MVJ has years of story in place for these characters and will pretty much stick to that plan (obviously with tweaking along the way) I do have some issues with the initial structure. Making the Duprees the centerpiece and not having a male with that name. Making Martin Vernon and Anita's would have solved that and made the age of the character more appropriate. I agree about not having a young couple in the beginnings of a romance. And having too many married couples. Jacob and Naomi could be just living together. That makes the possibility of other relationships more viable than within a marriage. Same with Smitty/Martin. Having them married with kids limits the story especially in terms of them as a gay couple.  The white characters existing in another universe is also a problem. That ties in with the workplace/job issues. I don't think they needed the hospital-instead the police station/real estate office or Martin's workplace could have utilized and have Derek/Ashley/Vanessa/Smitty/Shanice etc working and interacting there. ATM too many characters are meeting up in cafes etc-we're not seeing them at work. We needed to see more of how various characters interact eg Jacob/Bill, Ted/Bill. There were a lot of extended family scenes but there should be more one on one to get a sense of character and family dynamics. Leslie is a great character but her bag of tricks is getting over exposed. I would hate that she is kept on and other character's made to look like idiots by accepting her presence. They'll need some good writing and twists to keep her around. We can only hope some of the lesser actors improve as I don't want too many recasts or writeouts. So it's early days and I look forward to seeing the show evolve. And give the Duprees some staff!
    • Thanks. I barely remember any of the backstory there, just his ties to her parents. It was all so convoluted, everything with Tangie.
    • 81 and 82 were rather bad, with the infamous invasion of the Kirkland family. But sometime in late 82 or early 83, Claire Labine was rehired as head-writer and immediately put the focus back on the Ryan's. This time Labine's tenure was short, but she did great work. The entire show was compelling again -- especially the Charlotte Greer storyline (one of the best plots of the entire series).  But Labine was fired, yet again, and Ryan's Bar was bombed, resulting in most of the action being transferred to Greenberg's Deli, and a focus on younger characters with little connection to the Ryan family. So that is what you are probably seeing from 84.   
    • It wasn't that altruistic. He made Tangie a substitute for Blake and was apparently so creepy about it that Tangie spent the years in between getting away from him and running into him in Springfield believing that he had purchased her to be his child bride. It was only when she got to know Blake that she realized that she realized his feelings for her were paternal and suddenly she and Roger became friends.
    • When I watched 1999 Daytime Emmys in real time, I was like "Daytime Emmys will never top this" and that's exactly what happened (at least IMO).
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy