Jump to content

AMC: Thursday 6/3/10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

What majority? Got proof of that?

Glad someone's enjoying them, I find Annie just a one note nut job, Scott is a gomer(or Gumby as some like to call him) and JR I have no use for. JR & Annie have major shades of Babe & JR, and Scott and Annie are Babe and Jamie lite

Sorry but IMO MCE is very overrated as an actress, and Adam Mayfield is okay but all wrong for Scott, and Jacob Young does his best work AWAY from this "triangle"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Same here. The triangle and Erica/Caleb are the main attractions for me right now.

Upthread, there was something about how a Scott/Annie pairing would mean Annie being watered down into a goody two shoes. I have to disagree. If they do it right, a Scott/Annie pairing could be so entertaining. The idea of this shady woman who is unafraid of scheming and plotting to get what she wants with a guy who always tries to play by the rules...it's perfect! Whenever he's too weak to fight for himself, she'll jump in and do what she has to do to get him some happiness. Whenever she's got herself in a big mess, he can jump in and be a voice of reason. I want that so bad for them!

ETA: Annie is NOTHING like Babe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just because JR and Scott have incredible ties to AMC's history (and btw, Scott is Cindy's son by Fred Parker, not Stuart and Marian's), that does not mean they are automatically interesting in and of themselves. On GUIDING LIGHT, Shayne and Marah Lewis were the children of one of the show's all-time biggest supercouples, Josh and Reva. Yet, whenever they weren't on-screen, you hardly ever noticed.

Also...? Annie/Scott/JR might be popular right now w/ AMC's viewers, but look at what else is currently on the canvas. Compared to that other, stanky [!@#$%^&*], it can't help but grab people's attention, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just go board to board, or read epi. recaps or podcast from DTC. They are the talk of AMC. The Chandler SL is kicking ass and making ppl want to know what happens next. It's not Jamanda, it's not Erica, it's not DaLee .. it's JR and Scott and Annie and what's to come for the Chandlers and a little w/ Tad and the Martin clan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Khan you are on a roll today B)

I'm curious as to what there is that says this triangle is remotely popular? I don't see raves about them in the soap mags, the soap mags don't really seem to give a crap about this and so on and so forth.

Sad when Jack/Erica/Caleb is more interesting than those 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank you.

IMO, Caleb/Erica ("Calerica"?) is just a rehash of several other Great Love Stories from the Life of Erica Kane. How many times has La Kane crossed paths with some "alpha male" who was eventually bowled over by her after some hesitation? It was classic with Brandon Kingsley, even more so with Mike Roy and Jeremy Hunter; but since then, it's just "lather, rinse, repeat." Even worse, this time, it's tied to one couple (Jack/Erica) whose popularity with fans continues to leave me nonplussed. (Seriously, guys, what are we supposed to see in Jackson Frigging Montgomery?!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some of it on YouTube; some of it from Mother's old, old, really old tapes; and some from what I've read over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Shayne and Marah were badly written and they never had actors play the adult characters for a longer period of time. GL was too focused on JONATHAN!!!!! that they forget all about Shayne and Marah who were treated like second class citizens.

As for Marah, I liked Laura Bell Bundy but she was only on for 2 years or so and she was a teen. the other Marah was an idiot.

I liked Jeff Branson as Shayne but it was too late anyway.

One thing I do love about AMC is that they had the balls to write JR (a legacy character) as a bad guy. Most soaps tend to whitewash characters we have seen grow up onscreen or in GL's case, ignore them completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Tina Sloan tied Jerry VerDorn record when Guiding Light was cancelled - 26 years uninterrupted 
    • Very true...but TPTB all were desperate to get into prime time or films and couldn't, so they looked down on their own industry and tried to infuse themes that just didn't work in soaps. I would have thought after 9/11 the shows would have gone out of their way to provide that warmth and comfort that the audience wanted, and to bring old viewers back. Budget cuts? Just bring back kitchen sets, both ATWT and GL got rid of those besides one each..(the Snyders and the Bauers) You don't need super fancy sets if you have the writing. 
    • LMAO they didn't 

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • LY has a job on another show. She's going to be on the Legally Blonde prequel "Elle" 
    • From what I can put together, the 1980s had several actors with interrupted runs. Michael Zaslow: 1971-1980, 1989-1997 Maureen Garrett: 1976-1980, 1988-?, ?-end Christopher Bernau: 1977-1984, 1986-1988 Peter Simon: 1981-1984, 1986-1996, ?-end Maeve Kinkead: 1981-1987, 1989-1996, 1997-end Robert Newman: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end Jordan Clarke: 1983-1987, 1989-1993, 1996, 1997-end By 1989, I believe the longest-tenured cast member without a departure was Jerry verDorn.
    • I know they were popular, but once they tamed Van's shrew, I thought Billy just brought Van down. Since they had just Nola and Billy sitting around in 97, an interesting thing would be if they had developed a friendship that turned into something else while Van was "dead". Maybe Billy lives at the Boardinghouse (to work on repaing his relationship with Bill) and works at Company instead of the stupid diner. Nola and Bridget give him a job there and Nola and Billy (who had originally been a bit antagonistic) slowly build up a relationship and then Van returns. A returned new lease on life Van would return to her "high hat ways" and take on the Spaulding's for control of the company with Billy helping her behind the scenes.  I know that Jordan was on sporadically because of his issues and them not know if they could trust him not to fall of the wagon, but they could have done it slow..and give Van and Nola a new reason to get in each others hair (I love a good Van/Nola tussle.)
    • Congratulations to Coco Gauff on her second win in one of the GS tournaments, the French Open.

      Please register in order to view this content

          Perhaps it wasn't the most well-played match in history, but that's something no one will remember in a few years time.
    • The thing with Martin (for me) is that he should have been Anita and Vernon's kid. I honestly think he would have been fine being an older or younger brother to Dani and Nicole. It also would have made his relationship and kids feel more realistic. A handsome salt and pepper late 40s/early 50s congressman who settled down and adopted kids to fit an image for politics. Not that he didn't want this lifestyle but it is what he needed to do to get ahead. Also, we don't often get older characters playing LGBT roles not just on daytime but across most media. It would have been a refreshing take. As an alternative, Sam and Ty could have been Martin's kids from an earlier marriage a la the NJ governor that was outed. We could have also seen parallels between Vernon and Anita thinking back to how they handled Martin coming out compared to the way they accepted Chelsea.  As for Martin being Nicole and Ted's kid, I do wish in this case he was not tied to a marriage and kids, so that he could date and sleep around like any other character on a soap.  Yeah, I didn't get it...but what I did get is that girl is a bit crazy like her mama.  Vanessa and Joey talking about the poker table...get these people off my screen. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Unpopular opinion, but I didn't think the show should have reunited Billy/Vanessa at all until the final stretch of the show. When watching the 1989 episodes when both Vanessa and Billy return after being off the show... I liked that Vanessa had moved on from him and that the show was hinting at her wanting to reunite with her first love Ross while looking down at Nadine for being the one Ross was dating.  And I loved the twist where Billy and Nadine teamed up to keep Vanessa/Ross apart.   This was an interesting concept that sadly the writers dropped with the show deciding to make Vanessa pine over Billy between 1990 and 1993 when they finally reunited.   To me, Vanessa pining over Billy seemed out of character. At least once Billy was carted off to prison in 1994... she and Billy divorced and stayed divorced until the final months when they finally found their way back together.  During the years when they were divorced, I liked that they had maintained a friendship and connection.. with viewers (like my late mom) wondering if they would ever decide to make it work again. I wish the show had tried that with Josh/Reva because by the time of the final episode when they rode off into the sunset, I didn't care because we'd been through the make up and break ups between them for over 10+ years by that point.
    • I break down the primetime soap era (start of Dallas to end of Knots Landing) as  Up to Spring 1982: Building the foundation. Fall 1982-Spring 1985: Peak. Fall 1985-Spring 1988: Tanking. Fall 1988 onward: Off the rails plus budget mode. Of course individual shows vary and I've broken down each show in their threads.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy