Jump to content

Nicollette Sheridan suing Marc Cherry


Soapsuds

Recommended Posts

  • 8 months later...
  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Earlier this year, TV star Nicollette Sheridan sued her former 'Desperate Housewives' employers--including the show's creator Marc Cherry, Touchstone Television Productions, ABC Studios and ABC Entertainment--for $20 million in relation to her firing.

RadarOnline.com reports that on Friday, new papers were filed, dropping some of the more shocking accusations from the original lawsuit. The actress previously claimed assault and battery, emotional distress, gender violence and wrongful termination.

In the new papers, Sheridan removed the claims of physical injury and emotional distress--and as a result, she will not have to submit to a physical and psychiatric evaluation.

She previously stated that she suffered--and continued to suffer--physical injury and emotional distress and in response, the defense demanded a physical and psychiatric evaluation.

http://www.popeater.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Members

Well, I guess you guys heard the news today that the judge has declared a MISTRIAL, and everything is going to have to start over. Marc Cherry must be shitting bricks.

By Harriet Ryan and Victoria Kim, Los Angeles Times

March 20, 2012

Four years after a sweeps week audience watched Edie Britt, the bed-hopping real estate agent in "Desperate Housewives," draw her last breath, a Los Angeles jury said Monday that it could not decide the cause of her death.

A judge declared a mistrial in Nicollette Sheridan's wrongful-termination suit after jurors said they were deadlocked as to whether the actress' character was killed off the ABC show in an act of retaliation or for creative reasons.

Eight jurors — one short of the nine required for a verdict in civil court — sided with Sheridan, who alleged that she was written off the show because she complained that the program's creator, Marc Cherry, had struck her in the head during a 2008 rehearsal. The other four voted with Touchstone Television Productions, whose lawyers said Cherry never hit Sheridan and had plotted Edie's death months before the actress made the allegation.

The jury had deliberated for four days and on three of those days, sent notes to L.A. County Superior Court Judge Elizabeth White, saying they were unable to reach a verdict. In a note Friday, the foreman said the split hadn't changed since an initial vote the first day of deliberations.

During the two-week trial, numerous witnesses from the show recalled the 2008 incident that ended with Sheridan yelling, "You hit me! You can't hit me!" and storming from the set. The actress testified Cherry had given her a "wallop" to the temple after she repeatedly questioned a line of dialogue. Cherry and others present said he had only tapped her to demonstrate a playful smack he wanted her to give her on-screen husband at the close of a scene.

Two jurors who voted for Sheridan said the case came down to witness credibility. Juror Beverly Crosby said she found Sheridan believable while the accounts of defense witnesses "didn't hold water for me." Speaking to a throng of reporters on the courthouse steps, she dismissed defense suggestions that the actress' story was suspect because she had variously characterized the blow as a slap and a hit.

"The evidence showed she was struck, so we didn't get bogged down with the terminology," Crosby said. "I looked at the fact that she was touched without permission."

Sheridan's lawyers had argued that producers, executives and writers at ABC and the studio had coordinated their testimony to help Cherry, but juror Johnny Hyunh hesitated when asked if the witnesses seemed rehearsed.

"I wouldn't say scripted. It's more like the story didn't match," Hyunh said.

No jurors who cast their votes for Cherry attended the news conference.

The trial offered jurors a behind-the-scenes look at the soap, which is to end this spring after eight seasons. The picture painted was often unflattering. Jurors heard that tabloid leaks from the set were a constant problem. There were salary disputes and tiffs over forgotten lines. Sheridan said Cherry condescended to her, and he said she was rude, tardy and unprepared for rehearsals. He recounted the frustration of co-star Teri Hatcher when Sheridan missed her lines and said two other stars, Felicity Huffman and Eva Longoria, were "relieved" when they learned she was leaving the show.

Much of the testimony focused on the timing of Cherry's decision to kill off Edie. Ten witnesses said he made it months before the on-set incident, but two writers for the show said her fate was not sealed until afterward.

Lawyers for both sides said they expected to retry a case that involves millions of dollars. Sheridan, who earned $4 million a year playing Edie, is seeking at least $5.7 million for economic losses and potentially much more in punitive damages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One short of what she needed....but certainly victorious in comparison to the Cherry/ABC side.

I have felt Nicollette was in the right from day one and the testimony from the ABC executives only confirmed my instincts. Things were coordinated and they were coordinated poorly because ultimately the truth is obvious and the truth is that ABC colluded to fire her for rocking the boat with the claim that Cherry hit her. A claim that, while not satisfying the court's definition of assault, has been admitted by Cherry and ABC.

Ms Sheridan is a confident and credible witness and ABC should do what is in their best interest and settle this case and settle it for what Ms Sheridan is asking for which should be in the $10 million range.

Had she had one more viewer on her side, she would have seen a punitive damage windfall that could have gotten her $20 million. ABC should just bite the bullet on this one because they're in the wrong annd 8/12 of their peers saw it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Meh I feel like Nicollette story changed too much, and she acts like her character was the only one ever killed off on DH.

MC doesn't have the right to strike her, but this whole things seems blown out of proportion, would she have even filed suit if her character hadn't been killed off? Nope very doubtful

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But don't you understand that her lawsuit is for wrongful dismissal? That she's suing precisely because she was fired?

Her suit isn't even about the assault, what Marc Cherry admitted to, while inappropriate, doesn't satisfy the legal definition of assault and/or battery. Wrongful dismissal? 8/12 jurors felt she was wrongfully dismissed. She only needed one more and she can keep on trying this case until she gets her 9th juror.

I have found her story very consistent and the variety of her witnesses (DH writers, low level people at ABC who accidentally received an email informing them that their computers were going to be wiped of all email, television executives and Sheridan herself) instead of the circle jerk of ABC executives who are all biased as hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a shame what happened to Nicollette, but in interviews I always was under the impression Marc Cherry didn't like her. He made it clear in interviews she WASN'T the 5th housewife, something it seems ABC pushed. Every now and then she'd get her chance to shine, but he kept her in her place for the most part, only giving her bigger stories following her success after Marcia Cross went on maternity leave.

The worst part of this is that Nicollette will probably get blacklisted, which is a shame because I truly felt she was the most entertaining actress on Desperate Housewives. When the writing went to shyt, it was her keepin me tuned in. I think they were stupid not to look at her chemsitry with Neal McDonough and tried to find a way to make it work. I thought he breathed new life into the show and had they pulled back again they could've had a great villain. Unfortunately, they love those season long arcs which did him in.

I think Nicollette's best hope is that Dallas is a huge, huge hit and they decide to pursue a Knots Landing reboot. She'd be the obvious choice for that and it could help put her back on the map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nicollette will absolutely be blacklisted by anyone in the ABC/Disney sphere, plus the ripple effect. That said, there are going to be studios and producers out there who hate Marc Cherry, hate ABC and might delight in hiring her to put the screws to a competitor because Nicollette does have her defenders, Jackie Collins has been very vocal about how much she enjoyed working with Nicollette on her NBC mini series. Really, I think Nicollette would be great on one of those NBC sitcoms like The Office or Parks and Recreation, she was the best thing about DH and I have to think others in the business noticed it.

The good news for her is that she WILL defeat ABC the next round. She WILL collect millions and that will help feather an already secure nest. Nicollette has her Knots Landing residuals to keep her warm at night in addition to her Desperate Housewives residuals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy