Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is so stupid. This is the new "in" thing for Real Housewives broads who can't handle being called out on their hypocrisy. First Jacqueline, then BH's Adrienne, now Jacqueline AGAIN? She needs to be let go. She has no story. I really hope they don't drag her back in for season 5. Adrienne can go too, as I'm sure she's gonna look REAL bad this upcoming season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 40.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    4971

  • Taoboi

    4036

  • Cat

    4021

  • NothinButAttitude

    3976

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I don't believe the rumors that Adrienne missed the reunion because it makes no sense for them to film the Beverly Hills reunion before any of the season has aired. We don't even have a premiere date. Plus Andy was in New York the day it was said to be filmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the reports are getting it wrong, because apparently the conversation Jacqueline had with Kim G (good Lord, really? Out of all the friends and acquaintances in the world to vent to, you had to run to THAT famewhore?) was on the night of the reunion she skipped LAST YEAR. Whatevs. I still think she's become irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NYC Season 4:

Boy did Alex grow a pair or what? She hasn't stopped getting angry and confronting people in four episodes. Talk about going from zero to hero lol People breathe the wrong way and she's all over them!

Sonja, whom I loved as the sexually free housewife of Season 3, also came out... as an enormous, egotistical bitch. The sh*t she pulled at the gay equality march and throwing Alex out, and getting pissed because her "friend" couldn't go to lunch because she chipped her tooth... Bitch, get a grip. Although I'm watching episode 5 now and her impersonation of Ramona is UNBELIEVABLY good! I mean, wow!

LuAnn continues to infuriate me just with her mere presence. She doesn't even need to say anything; her hypocritical, faux-singer face is enough.

Cindy, I'm still indifferent to. I don't feel I "know" her well enough yet.

Kelly's toned down the craziness, but still.

Ramona continues to be the mess she's always been and I love her for it, but she's definitely leaving Entertainmentville and going towards Annoyingville where I'm concerned. In other words, I'm annoyed by everyone LOL!

Who would have thought that Jill would be the most tolerable? I expect that to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is exactly why Alex being fired puzzled me. She finally found her voice and boy did she let everyone hear it! This was her breakout season and they should have kept her on to continue feuding with the now boring LuAnn

Cindy? She ranks as one of the worst RH's ever. I thought hse had potential at first but turns out to be a major dissapointment. And to think that she was supposed to be the new Bethenny...ha!

Jill wasnt as bad as she was in season 3 but I remember still hating her in season 4. She tried to redeem herself early on by playing it safe and biting her tongue but I recall that not lasting long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only reason they dumped Alex was for that foolish attempt to reboot the series and make it more like Beverly Hills. They wanted Alex as a Friend of the Housewives, they just didn't think she was wealthy enough (or faux-wealthy) for what they were going for. It's ironic, because we never have even seen where Heather or Carole live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It really puzzles me that they would keep LuAnn... Even if one likes her, she presents minimal drama and has done so since the beginning of Season 3. So her purpose seems nonexistent.

Cindy certainly is no new Bethenny! I actually miss Bethenny. She's always been one of my faves.

Well, I'm not surprised about Jill. She came back from Australia saying she wants to stay out of drama and, literally two seconds later, she's doing it again!

As for Alex, I see no reason why she should go.

I wonder how the show will be when all the new Housewives come in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LuAnn did add little in the early seasons and she became Jill's little lapdog in season 3. The only interesting thing about her in season 3 is her feud with Alex and stepping out of Jill's shadows. With no Alex, she goes back to being boring. Her story in season 5 amounts to her considering having a baby with Jacque at her age. I mean really?

Cindy played thigns too safe with no opinion or stance. She didnt start to let people have it till the reunion and by then it was too late for her. I missed Bethenny as well but she's made a great career for herself

It took me about 4-5 episodes to warm up to the new housewives. The transition was too jarring and abrupt and I dont think the show did a good job at introducing them. I really think they should have kept Alex and only brought on Heather and Carole. Aviva could have been a "friend" of the housewives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like her but she doesnt really have much in the way of her own story. She is just there to support the other women and their stories. LuAnn being phased out is exactly why Aviva would just be a friend with the option to become new housewife next season. I just think that 3 new women was too much too soon. Carole and Heather had the most to offer right off the bat so thats why I think they were fit to join as full housewives right away. Aviva seems like she'd have been better fit gradually introduced before they took the plunge with her. She doesnt have as much to offer

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hahaha Sorry if I was too negative, I just started typing and typing once I got going hahaha
    • @dc11786 Thanks for taking time to answer my various questions, along with giving your thoughts on the different writing teams. I wonder why they didn't just have Ryder and TR leave together if Jane was going anyway. The discussions over the last few pages have made me more interested in watching these episodes than I have been over the years - without the extra details and analyses provided, these years can be difficult to decipher (not helped by how often Jo seems like a side character).
    • I didn't think this was very good (I've never yet seen a good episode of this revival), but you do get a lot of Michael Stroka. And if you are a Donna Reed Show fan, you also get Paul Petersen.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • A very rare, fascinating look at camera blocking in a 1980 episode. Very loose, almost startlingly so (who expects to see Will Vernon with a cig dangling out of his mouth?). @vetsoapfan There's some Jacquie Courtney content in the back half of the video.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Barbara Stock shares memories of her time on Dallas, including that Ken Kercheval was the only cast member she knew outside of the show and that she did not actually realize she was being written out. https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/29593/barbara-stock-spenser-for-hire-dallas-chips-spinoff-doing-know/
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  I concur that this isn't the most interesting material, but I do wish I could see how JoBeth Williams played those trial moments.
    • If I remember correctly, they were interrupted before Nicole could reveal what the third thing was. I remember feeling like it was an intentional interruption, too. 
    • 1976 Pt 5 Joanne’s hopes are raised when Jack seems to respond to the new woman she’s become. She wore a new dress and had a lovely dinner with wine, and when Jack drank more than he was used to having, he reached for her. Her happiness is dimmed when he calls her Peggy, but she says nothing. The next morning, when Jack can remember nothing, she tells him they made love. When Peggy later tells Joanne she’s going to have to stop helping her make herself over as it’s becoming too painful, Joanne angrily lashes back that Peggy might just as well back off, because Jack made love to her last night. Peggy, angry and hurt, asks Jack if it’s true. Realizing that Joanne told Peggy to hurt her, he tells Peg he’s going to ask Joanne for a divorce now. But Peggy is still guilt-ridden over Joanne and, fearing she can’t handle it yet, tells Jack about Joanne’s suicide attempt. Jack, horrified, goes home to see Joanne, who soon realizes that Peggy must have told him about the pills. She assures Jack that she knows life is too precious to ever do that again. Once Jack is satisfied that she really means it, he returns to us Peggy. But Peggy is close to breaking from the guilt and tension she’s living with, and tells Jack that if he’s ever free, they can decide then. Needing a fresh perspective, Peggy takes Chris up on her offer that Peggy spend the night with her, as Snapper won’t be home.  Chris, meanwhile, has been spending her free time preparing Nancy’s apartment for her homecoming. Expressing appreciation for everything she’s done, Ron has offered to make her a table similar to one he’s made for Nancy. Chris has thanked him and has given him her address so he can deliver it. Stuart, wondering why Ron can’t seem to get another job despite the leads he’s been given, checks him out and learns he was in prison for burglary but there was also’ a rape charge, which was dropped. Chris asks Nancy, who explains that before their marriage Ron picked up a woman in a bar. She took him to her apartment and began to seduce him but then screamed rape. He had taken nothing, Nancy adds, but was told he’d rot in prison if he didn’t plead guilty to burglary. No one  told him that the woman had declined to testify. Nancy was the only one who believed him, and she with him against her family’s wishes. Ron walks in at the end of the conversation and informs Chris that he tried to deliver her table but  finally realized he was looking for the wrong address. When Chris later returns to her apartment, she finds Peggy whimpering on the floor in the dark. Slowly Chris gets the story from Peg: The lights wouldn’t -work when she arrived, and she was grabbed from behind, thrown to the floor, and raped. Chris convinces Peggy that the police must be called and manages to protect Peggy from brutal questioning by insisting upon an officer trained in dealing with rape victims. After Peggy is taken to the hospital, the investigator, Miss Weston, asks Chris who might have  known Peg was there—or might want to rape Chris herself. After thinking this over, Chris tells her about Ron. Jack has been trying to reach Peggy. Lashing out from his own pain, Stuart brutally tells him that she’s been raped and he is partially to blame, as she went to Chris’s to get away from her problem—him. Jack is shattered. Instinctively knowing that Ron is guilty, Chris confronts him. But Ron sticks to his story of looking for a wrong address and, under pressure from Chris, finally offers to be in a lineup. Brock tells his mother that Jill wants to visit Phillip’s grave. Kay replies it will be “a cold day in hell” before. She does. But when Jill asks Kay if she would put some flowers on the grave for her and her baby, Kay, touched, breaks down and asks Jill to go with her. Liz, knowing that Kay spends too much time alone, virtually forces her to accept an invitation for dinner and then invites Ralph Olsen, a plumber who is a widower. Kay is aloof at first -they apparently have nothing in common—but when Ralph turns out to be a former alcoholic, the ice is broken. Ralph offers to help Kay with her drinking problem, and she soon finds she likes him very much. Liz becomes concerned with Kay’s assumption that her friendship with Ralph is heading for much more and tries to warn Kay that. Ralph is not the marrying kind. She tries to head Kay off when she makes plans for a “love nest,” but Kay persists and attempts to seduce Ralph at her pool. He evades her passes and asks her if they can’t just slow things down. But Kay is undaunted, and since he isn’t proposing, she does so herself. Ralph, who has told Bill that Kay’s money stands in‘ their way, gently turns her down, explaining that she would need to change him and they wouldn’t be happy. Humiliated and hurt, Kay starts drinking again.
    • I think it wasn't just some of the poor casting choices that did the show in during its early days, but also the flat writing. Perhaps it was network interference? You'd think the Dobsons would have fought harder for their original vision, but after 6 months they dropped most of it. 
    • Small Bar is a better set than the casino set.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy