Jump to content

The Suds Report 2/26/10


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

His Adam/Palmer comment was a big WTF? Their rivalry drove a lot of story in the 80s, and eventually settled into a semi-comedic frenemyship (is that even a word? LOL), even through McTavish's last era when they joined forces to protect Erica & Bianca during the Michael Cambis whodunnit. It seems like a fitting character-oriented way for him to leave, and will bring his relationship with Palmer full circle. I'm sad he's leaving, but I'm looking forward to that storyline. Yeah, I have the feeling too that Nelson ties AMC's success with OLTL's failure and is jealous of the press the show has gotten lately as well as its ratings increase. He really is sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC has been horrible for years but has obviously done something right recently- those ratings don't lie.

Jealousy? I'm jealous myself that OLTL gets no promotion. I probably would have the same agenda that Nelson has- this is why I could never be a journalist.

He can be highly unprofessional.

May I add that OLTL's prenominee list reminds me of Y&R's last year? IT SUCKS.

If I was running a show, I would submit who I knew had the scenes/episode to WIN. The only actors on OLTL last year who have tapes to win are Florencia Lozano and maybe Bree- Florencia would have WON any category.)

What a waste. Crystal Hunt, emmy material? Jerry Ver Dorn? Hillary B Smith I LOVE, but did I miss something last year? Robert S Woods? I hope I am forgetting something.

OLTL will be lucky to have 3 or 4 nominations this year. And I predict that B&B will win again, now that Brad Bell has attended JFP Emmy Episode University.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's true for the entire show isn't it? If OLTL were better written and paced it would deserve the same promotion as AMC but it isn't. Don't get me wrong the show has some phenomenal talent. I'd put JvD and RSW up against Canary any day but OLTL simply doesn't have the "perfect storm" of promotable events happening that AMC does: the 40th, the move, death of an icon, DC retirement, Brooke/Jackson/Greenlee return, etc. All they have is an upcoming Glee ripoff.

And they'll never have Erica Kane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see what you're saying, but in terms of recent stories, I think that a buildup of the Cramer women on the show itself, and their dynamics, along with a promo showing various clips of them in danger with "Who will live? Who will die?" could have worked. Or if they had made Dorian make the choice. It would have to be better than promos constantly focusing on crap like Danielle or the Stacy baby story, where the stories just aren't worth watching, even if the promo might be OK.

They had a story on Hollyoaks a few years ago where Myra McQueen and her many children were kidnapped and Myra had to choose which one would die. The promos for it were great and helped drive the ratings up high for that week.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think ABC very much favors GH. It has always, and I think always will be, their pet. And AMC is definitely their second pit. They promote the [!@#$%^&*] out of those two shows, but yet I dont see anything ever about OLTL. And they almost never mention OLTL in their press releases....I think ABC know that at some point soon one of their soaps has to go, and since AMC and GH have traditionally been their pets, they just gave up on promoting OLTL..It's a shame, because there have been many many times when it is better than both the other shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't ever remember DC talking about wanting to retire. The only thing I've ever read in regards to that was Nelson's BS. Last year he said DC has alot trouble learning his lines and they were gonna phase out Adam cause Stuart's lines were easier to remember. He had it where DC was basically like he was feeble.

I think DC would still be with the show if it hadn't moved to LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: Felicia started out as camp bitch on a very dreary show (with Cecile being the only somewhat fun character around that point) and then got into a lot of comedy. Some of the comedy was very stupid, but many viewers still felt drawn to it, to Lily, Cecile, Cass, Felicia, Kathleen, Wallingford. There was a vibrancy which Dano fit well in, her fashions and melodrama parodied in a gentle way. This was missing in some of the long-suffering parts she'd had had on shows like ATWT. By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy