Jump to content

Top ten: Small-screen b!tches


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

"Joan took Alexis seriously and it showed"

Absolutely. She often had a LOT going on visually, and it was like a symphony watching her work a hat, a stole, a pocket book, gloves, a cig... even some real-life smokers are awkward smokers on screen, they don't know how to judge the drags and the lines, but Joan was a pro at that. Diahann Carroll was obviously not a smoker IRL. And I think of how great she looked stroking a letter opener behind her tusks desk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Donna Mills also took a lot of care of Abby. I believe she did her own makeup, as the makeup people made her look bad. She was the major reason why Abby did not know about Val's babies being stolen for some time, and why Abby was the one who told Val the truth. She also left when she realized the show was not writing properly for Abby.

A lot of people think all it takes to be a soap bitch is to toss off sneery one-liners and sleep around, but you have to actually care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I Love Donna Mills, but darn if Julie Harris deserves some honorable mention here. Look at the dressing down she gives Abby at :42:

Please register in order to view this content

And the best scene of all, this made my heart jump out of my chest the first time I watched it (I think i was 16):

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The mere mention of Lilimae reminded me of something. Have you guys seen this? @3:50, so *DEAD*

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="

Please register in order to view this content

name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src=" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That Lillimae scene is priceless.

I'm so happy they had the Abby scale quote. :lol: And the Olivia smashes up the room scene, made even more hilarious by their obvious reluctance to really break much of anything.

Laura's video, one of my favorite KL moments, was great too. And they recreated the opening credits, I love it.

And I'm reminded of how much I disliked those contrived and showy speeches from Karen ("I'm proud to be a Pollyana") and especially Valene (let's make Laura's funeral all about ME ME ME ME ME).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Members

So... I was wondering, and this is probably a dumb question... If I understood correctly, you went to drama school? :unsure: Or I got it wrong! Nevermind, I just want to ask: do they teach you how to deal with props? Is special attention given to them at one point in time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ummm, yes and no, but not really. How's that for an answer? :P I mean, for emotional purposes, yes, but for stylistic purposes which I think is more to the point of your question, no. That sort of "finishing school" approach ended in the earlier part of the 20th century when acting went from very studied and mannered to more raw and naturalistic. Whether you're doing a scene for class or a full production, you're always told to become familiar with your props. Just like if a scene takes place in your character's bedroom, we want the audience to believe that so you have to own that space as the character would. So say a script specifies that your character always carries around his favorite umbrella that his dead grandpa gave him, the actor will probably want to start working with an umbrella very early on in the rehearsal process because the character most likely spins it, twirls it, balances it on the tip of his finger almost subconciously in a way unlike someone who only grabs their umbrella when it rains. Just like you'd want to practice smoking if your character smokes and you do not.

Now if you're doing a Restoration play for example, some time will be spent working on the style, the way people move and accentuate their words and movements with fans and handkerchiefs and walking sticks. That's something that certain actors just have a natural flair for. That's the Joan Collins thing we're talking about. Of course it can be practiced and improved, and Joan herself is probably great at it because of her love for movies growing up in the '30s and '40s when everyone on screen walked around looking like Alexis. :P But in a nutshell, no, there isn't class time devoted to how to "properly" hold your cigarette or anything like that.

ETA: That was long-winded, I hope it answered your question! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a different kind of character.

Forgot all about Diana Rigg in Mother Love! LOVE it--I need to track that down.

When I was a theatre major it was the same thing--you deal with props on a "need to know" basis, there wasn't a specific class for it, LOL, though I know some older more formal classes *do* have that. It's like accents--many of the classical schools have specific accent classes but (for better and worse) most teachings now will only get into that depending if it's needed for your scene work or a role you're doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That was fascinating! :D And is in agreement with my previous thoughts on the matter. Thank you!

And as for accents... That's another thing I have a "thing" for. In the UK, Eileen Atkins does not like the newest trend of encouraging young actors to retain their regional accents. She believes that Estuary English is "ruinous" for British drama. More here, here and here. Nothing like RP. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't know what would they then say for German newsreaders! :lol: If I'm informed well, they have to know the language well (grammar and all) and have an appropriate voice to do the job!

But the "death" of RP saddens me, it's the most beautiful of accents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy