Jump to content

ONE LIFE TO LIVE and lack of 'recognition'


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Not to scapegoat Frons, and this also doesn't excuse how poorly written Tina's return was, but I think Evans being fired so quickly was probably down to him. That and the A Martinez firing were both very damaging to the canvas and I don't know if I believe they came from anyone actually at OLTL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I still say that the "name value," or supposed lack thereof, rhetoric is a bunch of bullshit.  No TV show that's been on the air for over 40 years is hurting in name value.  I never watched Wild Kingdom or the Electric Company, but have heard of them both.  The average Joe has heard of One Life to Live.  They may not know the difference between it and Days of Our Lives, or who Viki is, but they know the name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Susan Lucci and some AMC peeps don't want to relocate, it seems to not be a deal breaker. Anyway, OLTL has had more than one interesting actor/character they discarded for being too unique in favor of keeping Todd, Blair and Coma Cop. The guy that played RJ, what kind of raw deal did he get? Was he just too dark skinned for ABC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I both agree and disagree. The name value thing is definitely overstated. That said--if you were on a gameshow and asked to name soap opera names, the average contestant would come up with General Hospital, Youg and Restless, AMC, Days before One Life. I've met two guys from overseas now where few American soaps ran at all who were aware of Susan Lucci and that she was on a show called AMC, and not at all of One Life--AT ALL. But does that matter here? Probably not at all.

On the other hand ABC does seem to feel this way a bit too. In the 80s what was the show they tried out their first attempt at making games based on their soaps with (first a board game and then How To Host a Mystery...). All My Children. In the 90s what was their first one they tried trading cards with? AMC--then GH then when they realize dno one wanted to buy stupid trading cards for soaps they gave up before getting to One Life. And when they did Daytime to Remember remember originally it was gonna be a month of AMC and then 5 weeks of GH (leading to a GH spin off, afterall, with PC's premier). Only after tons of complaint did they take one week from AMC and one from GH and squeeze two of One Life there.

Well Susan Lucci is, lets face it, in a valued position. OLTL did say something about Evans' flying out not being in their budget--but I'm definitely in agreement with you about who they've kept and who they've dumped

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I came across a quiz on Sporcle that has people name all daytime soaps that aired on the networks for at least a certain amount of time (I think it was at least 3 full years), and the top three guessed were GH (97.7%), AMC (95.5%), DAYS (90.9%), GL (86.4%), and a tie of B&B/OLTL/Y&R (77.3%). I'm surprised ATWT ranked under OLTL, but then I realize that in order to find this quiz, I had to search for "soap opera" quizzes, so it could very well be possible that the results are skewed because the majority of the people who took the quiz are soaps fans who are familiar with most long-running soaps (the only two soaps with 0% are Hawkins Falls, and surprisingly, LIAMST, which ranks below such forgotten fair as Young Dr. Malone and Valiant Lady).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whereas, I agree OLTL has always been the red-headed stepchild of the ABCD lineup, and I agree the identity of the soap is somewhat lacking, even I, who has really never watched OLTL is familiar with the brand.

I'm not as well-read and informed on soap lore as you all are, but wasn't it started as being about diversity and class issues? And doesn't that somewhat persist to this day? At least I get that somewhat when OLTL conversation overlaps into other threads I read.

In the end, though, I feel like this brand thing is just a guise for fans who exist on soap boards. There may have been a brand initially, and some soaps may be better at sticking to it than others, but honestly, aren't they all about baby switches, daddy issues, evil twins, corporate takeovers, multiple marriages and star-crossed lovers? Really?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy