Jump to content

HBO: Game of Thrones


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yes, Elia was married to Rhaegar Targaryen. Notice that Oberyn said that "he left her for another woman". This supports the theory that Rhaegar had taken Lyanna Stark as either a mistress or another wife. The idea being that Lyanna died giving birth to Jon Snow and made Ned vow to claim him, so that Robert wouldn't hurt him. I'm convinced this is why they made such a point of showing that Robert was willing to kill Targaryen children. The fly in the ointment is when Jon killed the white walker with fire and it burned his hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Cersei was awful to Jamie. What an ungrateful wench

What was Jamie supposed to do with Joffrey? Joffrey is king. Even Tywin kisses his ass. If Jamie tried to act like a father or even bring that up, he'd probably end up losing more than his hand.

Edited by Cheap21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Martells made quite an impression. I have loved Indira Varma since Rome - ironically, that was HBO's precursor show to GOT which taught them how to manage large budgets and large location shooting, but not before having to end that show to save their purse (it also starred Ciaran Hinds, Kevin McKidd, Ray Stevenson, the fantastic Polly Walker and the great Lindsay Duncan, among many others). She went on to Torchwood, among other things, and now it's great to see her here. Pedro Pascal was great pawing that hot spy at Littlefinger's pleasure den. I have my suspicions about what could happen at this famous Purple Wedding, but I have to believe that any potential swerve might come not from the obviously aggressive Martells but from someone else. I half-suspect the ruined Ser Dontos (which I keep reading as Ser Doritos) to take up arms against the Lannisters.

I love Jaime and Brienne together, but I don't know what Brienne expects Jaime to do here - send Sansa to crazy Lysa Tully who has been agitating against Kings Landing for at least a year? Like it or not, with Tyrion as her husband Sansa's life is relatively secure. As secure as it gets, because she's satisfied Tywin Lannister. If you can't do that, or at least stay off his radar, your life is forfeit. I loved the deeper look into Sansa and Jaime's characters last year and I love the continued emphasis on them this year. They seem like stock types early in Season 1, but there's so much more to both of them. It's so odd seeing Jaime all cleaned up and pretty again, alongside Brienne, who knows him better than most.

I was glad Jon had no time for the ancient Night's Watch bullshit. I also loved that very candid scene with him and Sam. Good stuff. It's about time Jon, like Daenerys, began taking on his rightful place in the narrative; I knew he would begin rising as one of the champions. Next up, hopefully, is Bran. Speaking of Daenerys, I suspect they intend to directly challenge her colonial 'liberator of slaves' narrative this year. I think Daenerys's cause is just, but that's only right and will be very interesting.

I'm over Shae. Sorry. Also, Arya was terrifying at the end, with that smile on her face as she killed the knight. Great work by Maisie Williams.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd be very surprised. Every time Dany frees slaves she gives them a choice. It's not like she really wants set up a colonial system. I do think Dany is going to be in over her head a bit, but I don't think this show is ever going to tell us she made a mistake by giving people their freedom from "the masters". Where they've gone wrong for me is making most of the people she's freeing darker skinned because that draws too many comparisons to modern history.

ETA: I think the main way the show justifies Dany being a savior of slaves is that when we first met her she was being sold to Drogo as a sex slave. She managed to turn that situation to her advantage by making him fall in love with her, but she started as a slave on her knees being raped by a "master."

Edited by Juliajms
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not so much her wanting to free slaves being wrong, it's the condescension in the presentation, sometimes in how she treats said people, sometimes in the writing or production itself. It's all very colonialist to me, even when it isn't intended to be. The only person I remember pointing out the emptiness of some of this "freedom" was the healer who killed Drogo and her unborn child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She didn't point out the emptiness of freedom, she pointed out the emptiness of life when freedom and everything else has been taken from you. Dany was pretty much never in a position to free the healer or her people. She did what she could to lesson their suffering, but Drogo was in charge. Before she burned the healer, she did give everyone left the chance to leave. Not sure what else she could have done for them other than give them a choice.

I do think Dany did learn some real lesson about what war is from that whole experience. It's never going to be clean and if she wanted clean she could have just stayed at Quath and set up a kingdom there.

At the end of the day, all of these people are living under either a slave system or a feudal system. Only in the far north are what modern day times would call free and I doubt that Dany or Jon will change that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The civil rights and politics in the world of GOT aren't the same as ours. Daenerys can only do the best she can for those people from her subjective experience and position of power. I do think she'll continue learning some lessons, but IMO to dismiss what she does as out of touch is to judge her by a real-world perspective that is removed from the context of that fantasy world and the way it is ruled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To me it's the same thing. What Dany saw as "freedom" was a very limited view. She thought this woman was indebted to her and didn't take the time to wonder how the woman must have felt, what she'd lost, and how that would affect who she was going to be after being "saved." If Dany had kept some of this in mind, she wouldn't have let the healer manipulate her into getting such revenge.

I think Dany doesn't entirely see those she "frees" as being people (yes she believes they are people in that they shouldn't be slaves, which is wonderful, but sometimes it's as if once she "frees" them, she forgets all the complications and baggage and that it's not as easy as them just dusting themselves off). That limits her as a leader. Hopefully this will be addressed and she can learn and grow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What do you think of Jaime's haircut?

I think it makes him look more like Joffrey, although he doesn't have that New Wave highlights from hell thing going on the way Joffrey does. I just mean in the face, he looks more like Joffrey now.

Do you think Cersei would be as distant toward Jaime if he still had his other hand? Is it the passage of time that has made her distant?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jaime's haircut makes him look...well OLD is the first word that comes to mind. He just looks worn out and for good reason. I mean any man or woman who's been thru all the crap he's been thru would probably look a little bit worse for wear. I think its even more obvious for him cuz he's always thought of himself as a "Golden Lion" and he had the hair, physique, and two hands to back up that claim. So he just looked very tired and kinda tuned out to me in the first episode which accurately reflects his mood and description in A Feast for Crows IMO....

He does look like Joff in some ways. While they made up that scene between Joffrey and him regarding the wedding and the Kingsguard I thought it was a little overdone with the insults Joffrey hurled at Jaime. Boy is just wrong....

I do think Cersei would be very distant towards him even without the hand situation. I just think it makes it worse. At the end of the Cersei is not a rational person (don't know how much you've read about the theories surrounding the Lannister Twins but there is one in particular that is QUITE interesting to me and if true explains A LOT about those two....)

That being said Cersei felt completely abandoned by Jaime and given the monster that is her son and the complete lack of respect from Lord Tywin I'm not surprised to see her lashing out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
    • @Maxim Great to see your mini-reviews again. There are a number of clips on Youtube of Janice's slow mental breakdown, especially as we go into January 1980. Christine Jones is just superb. She played the hell out of that role. Something which isn't referenced as much later on is how Mitch pushed Janice's doubts and mental instability for his own ends...until suddenly he didn't want to anymore (I guess he caught on with the audience and the show became wary). I don't want to post a bunch of clips, but this one has a very good confrontation between Rachel and Janice.

      Please register in order to view this content

      This has a good scene around 7 minutes in where you can see Janice struggling internally with her need to identify herself so much by the men around her, all of which helps lead to her crackup.  
    • It really made Oscar the Doorman seem like an imbecile.   I think the show's unusual format & subject manner is what makes EON often seem less "dated" and "old-fashioned" than other shows from that time period.  It never attempted to be especially "trendy" or "modern" -- and its film noir style is pretty timeless.  
    • Dallas, Dynasty, Knots and Falcon Crest all had good runs but by 85 they had seen better days. I think they were a victim of the format. After several seasons seeing the same characters front and center viewers were bored. What was once fascinating grew predictable. JR, Alexis etc had to be front and center and after a while their schemes and shtick grew repetitive. JR remarrying Sue Ellen, Alexis constantly trying to get he better of Blake etc Unlike daytime, there wasn't the flexibility to bring in other stories and characters and maybe let the likes JR go backburner. That same mentality also invaded daytime with characters like  Sonny and Victor still peddling the same stuff after decades. I guess the same could be said for MSW eg every week Jessica encounters a crime and solves it,but I think viewers come to that format with a different mindset.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy