Jump to content

Jay Leno moving back to the Tonight Show?


JaneAusten

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 295
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Heroes looks DOA.

Doesn't NBC Universal develop most of the shows for USA. I realize cable is a different animal but WTF. They've got a number of successes. Why can't they develop shows for NBC?

I really don't think NBC has a fricking clue on what it want's it's identity to be. Do they still want to attract the intellectual over 100K types or what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I heard on Today Weekend that the rumor is they may move Leno to his old timeslot, but only for a half-hour.

Interesting that they want to chip away at Letterman's audience by keeping Leno at a half-hour and then hoping the audience will stay around for Conan. But there's also Nightline to consider. ABC has always wanted to cancel the show, but the show always performs well when there's BIG news to report(i.e. Nigerian on a Plane, Brittany Murphy, Britney Spears, The Election). On some days, Nightline even outperforms Letterman in Total Viewers and 18-49.

Maybe NBC wants to keep Leno there, at a half-hour until they can see what he can do, then if he doesn't goose the numbers, expire his contract and then do a half-hour of Dateline 5 Nights a week, as a lead-in to Conan? Or do the more logical thing, move Conan back to his rightful place.

As mad as Jay and Conan fans are right now, let's face it...at least NBC is trying to save itself!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The sad thing is, prior to the 2008 Election, I think ABC always saw Nightline as rather expendable. I still think people at ABC feel that way.

I think that, combined with people's craving for reality, really saved Nightline from extinction. The format change(into a more newsmagazine format rather than the short documentary-esque tone Ted Koppell set from the beginning) really helped the show gain new viewers. I think it's great that Nightline survived and is still the only place in network television someone can get news or infotainment after the local news. I'm still sick as hell that ABC caved and canceled Politically Incorrect well before its time. Real Time is not the same show, and Jon Stewart/Stephen Colbert simply can't do for me what PI did. Bringing four random celebs, politicians, talking heads, organization leaders together to debate political issues and hotbutton issues was a genius concept(albeit ripped off from cable news shows). The show got much better when Maher dropped his terrible opening monologue and did the cold open.

As great as it is that ABC has expanded late-night and is doing Jimmy Kimmel, I really wish a show in that timeslot provoked more thought for its audience. But at the end of the day, it's all about money.

Give me Nightline anyday over Letterman, Leno, or Conan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's official.

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20335939,00.html

They want Leno at 11:35, Conan at 12:05, and then useless Fallon after that.

Why should Conan stay at NBC?

I think we have learned just how useless the Tonight Show name is without enough to back it up.

Jay Leno certainly did well for NBC during his run but a part of me wonders if the name is really worth anything without Johnny Carson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the brand left with Carson. The buzz and the public's fondness, everything (Carson even hosted all those awards shows -- he was of as much public interest as the show was). After that I think it just became some show Leno hosted, and some people kept watching because he was a nonoffensive, average joe presence, compared to someone like Letterman. Leno is someone who is easier to sit through after you watch the news or you want to wind down. But apparently NBC thought the Tonight Show itself was still of name value.

Put Leno in an earlier slot, when people are more used to stronger fare, and leave the Tonight Show where it is with someone who is not mainstream (like Conan -- he works best as an acquired taste), and you lose out.

They should just put Leno back at the Tonight Show instead of half-assing it. Then perhaps they can slowly phase in someone who can eventually replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I agree with what you say. And BTW: the So "it's official", but "it's not a done deal yet". LOL! was directed towards the People article, not you. :)

How is this going to work out exactly? Leno is getting a whole new, half-hour show? And The Tonight Show will start and 12:05 PM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, ANOTHER Law & Order! I don't know what to say. Couldn't they do more to build up the "mothership" L&O, which, along with SVU, has been battered about over the last few years? And set in Los Angeles. Very NCIS LA. They can cast James van der Beek and Busta Rhymes in the lead roles.

Howie Mandal is someone I find hard to watch when he's being himself; I much preferred him as a dramatic actor. I don't know how he'll be on this show, but then they might be moving him into that since Deal or No Deal is not what it once was.

I had to laugh when Gaspin said NBC "gave" CBS and ABC viewers at 10 PM and they didn't capitalize. Really, there was very little going on in NBC's 10 PM slot anyway, that's the reason they decided to try to go cheap and put Leno in.

After Time hyped Leno, putting him on their cover as the wave of the future, I hope they will have another big story to eat some crow. Then again, if the choice is between that and stuff like fawning over Ann Coulter, Leno's not so bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Above, I said "Vanessa needs to go to therapy to find ways to remain healthfully lusty and sex-positive, but to stay away from anyone who would demean her." Now adding onto that thought, I would clarify that sometimes I think Vanessa fools around for fun in a positive way.    But other times I sense that she's actually unconsciously trying to demean herself as way of numbing some inner pain -- it's hard to explain what I mean.  Sort of like... sometimes people drink for fun. But other times, people drink  in a self-destructive way, in order to drown out some inner pain. So I think she needs therapy about all of that.
    • A lot of these episodes are available on YT. The rape storyline starts around February or March of 1979 and Roger's demise is sometime in March 1980. The stuff from before 1979 is close to non exisitent, unfortunately.
    • Maeve Kinkead was on from 1980-1988 (left in January); 1989-2000 (went recurring 1996-97); 2002 -For Josh /Reva's Wedding; 2005 (appearances in May and December) back regularly from Feb 2006-end Maureen Garrett was on from 1976-80; 1988-2006 (recurring from 2003 on); 2009 Michael Zaslow was on/off from 1971-1980 with breaks in between but usually made an appearance every year then again 1989-1997. There is a youtube commercial  Guiding Light in 1968

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Holly's final big story was the Sebastian mess in late 2004.   Vanessa and Matt were promoted to regulars near the end and were heavily recurring prior to that starting around 2007/2008.
    • Keith has a softer presence, but it would have helped to see him be more aggressive or proactive in protecting them instead of standing around like a mannequin. A man the audience should be hoping and wishing gets back together with his wife. Nicole needs a new husband!
    • She needs to learn to be honest with her husband about her lusty interests because being sex positive only works if you're not cheating on your spouse.
    • https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1922782226317529409       https://x.com/JermaineRivers/status/1931204864136396907
    • Very disappointed in the writers in the way they are screwing with Nicole, Ted,  and Kat to make Leslie remain viable. So many holes everywhere.
    • Somebody brought this up elsewhere which emphasizes why this NuTed appears as such a weakling. Why is Kat doing what HE should be doing? And that's everything he can to rid him and his family of this crazy woman. Kat is doing all kinds of things she shouldn't do but now I understand her more. She can't count on her father to eliminate this woman because he's a wimp. He's been too busy inviting her into his home and serving her drinks and offering her invitations to birthday parties. WIMP!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy