Jump to content

2010: The Directors and Writers Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't bring him up Toups.

When it comes to discussion about a show I know well like Y&R, and a writer for the show is being discussed whose work I've followed on the show, I just join in. If it's about a show I have no emotional connection to, I don't join in. If this discussion was about his work on say OLTL, do you think I would have contributed?

I never begin the discussion about him. When discussion pops up about Janice Ferri Esser or any of the other "writers" from Y&R, I'm inclined to join in too. It's not a Casiello-exclusive situation. His work, like Beall's and Connor's doesn't deserve this much analysis, but it's hard to resist when the discussion is started.

And plus, I never just say I hate his work just because or whatever, I've made what I think are valid points when it comes to his output at Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Well, hopefully, this'll be it for another three months. I can dream, I guess.

Perhaps he'll post something on his Twitter and we'll be in Boredomville again. <_<

Increasingly, with every day that passes, people are becoming fed up with Y&R, utterly disillusioned, so what once might have been interesting, say... propping a storyline or something on Twitter or wherever, now is just obnoxious. Because no one gives a damn. People gave up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's one of the big reasons why he gets mentioned a lot. How many other soap writers out there engage with fans so actively on Twitter? Other writers have Twitter, but none of them have engaged so actively with a segment of fans on Twitter, and even subtly writing Tweets that can be taken in an offensive way by some fans of the show...

Exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Some people do give a damn because they stalk him on Twitter and then they bring it over to there. If they didn't give a damn, they wouldn't read his twitter or care what he says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Excuse me?! When was the last time I started a conversation that mentioned Hackiello?! I replied to it because RuxtonHills brought it up and IIRC, I said(like Sylph) that bringing him up was beating a dead horse. And even IF I didn't feel that way, how the hell is us bashing Hackiello any different from us talking [!@#$%^&*] about any other script/breakdown/headwriter/director/producer/actor. :)

I know that you and Casiello are boyz, but there's no need to lump me in as someone who gets off on talking sh*t about him. I'm just patiently waiting on the termination announcement, so you can close the thread or crash the board until you think we've all forgotten about it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I consider her work to be... mediocre. At best. Last time she was "here" at AMC, she was breakdown writing. Now, since that position has been obliterated, if you join the staff at AMC, you're pretty much scripting. Oh, and she's Lisa K. Connor, by the way. Thing is, she's not a writer. She's a producer who moved into writing, and she writes like that. I think she tends to write for the actors, more than she writes for the characters (I say this due to seeing her on Joan Lunden's "Behind Closed Doors" special 10 years ago where Lunden did a behind the scenes look at her guest stint on an AMC episode Connor was producing). The "disconnect," if I may use that overused word, is due to her being in the booth and giving notes to the directors and actors about performances. This is just my no-good, don't no nuffin' bout writin' no babies opinion... but, still. ;) I think it shows.

He's "one of us!"

Which says a lot. If he's "one of us" then he ain't nobody special. Just another internet soap lover with ideas... Oh, but his get printed and put on air... unfortunately.

I agree with this statement. I understand where it is you're coming from. With AMC, I speak ill of the works of Rebecca Taylor and, in the past, Amanda L. Beall. Typically, because either their work that day made me gag, or someone else brings them up. I can safely say I have never BROUGHT UP Amanda Beall in an "HERE'S why I think Amanda L. Beall sucks!" thread. But if the topic comes up, best believe... I've got something to say! ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When he Tweets something about the show or fans of the show, then his Tweets are open to public scrutiny, IMO.

He's an employees of the show, and if he Tweets about it or Tweets about fans of the show in any way, I don't see why fans shouldn't bring it up.

The same goes for the tired and down right ridiculous publicity ploys Michael Muhney pulls on the fans and on the show on Twitter.

When it concerns the show, the same show the fans are responsible for keeping on the air and ultimately giving them a paycheck, people can dissect the Tweets of these people (which is PUBLIC) all they want as far as I'm concerned.

I don't see anyone ever bringing up anything Casiello or Muhney has ever Tweeted about their personal lives here..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now I see my post might have multiple meanings I haven't foreseen, and I like it. :) When I said No one gives a damn, I mean no one cares about Y&R, people just... surrendered because this team will continue to suck everything into the gaping black hole that Genoa City is today.

But it can be applied to Twitter-stalking. :) It's just insane.

He is also to blame because he just needs to lock up that account. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is good. :)

Less Casiello talk is always welcome. We've exhausted that conversation ages ago. Now it's just repetition.

Casiello is actually a profoundly uninteresting 'entity', it's insane how he became so (in)famous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, my allegiance is to Y&R the show, not to those who write for it.

I don't watch the show or particularly care about it anymore (in its current state), but if a writer whose work I know well is mentioned, I will partake in the discussion. I don't know how this just became some false illusion that Casiello is some martyr and people are sending out some hit on him. Other writers get trashed here every day and it's no big deal...

Exactly my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, no. No martyrdom here. I don't think anyone believes that he is one.

People aren't really complaining about once again trashing Casiello, they're rather complaining about the once again part. Who wants for all this to be repeated once again? Who cares?!

Furthermore, you will do as you please, of course, ;) , but if someone brings up Casiello once again :rolleyes:, and you know someone will :rolleyes:, what could you possibly say about him that you haven't really said before? Is there really a need to fuel irrelevant discussions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

If Y&R didn't list their breakdown writers, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference of who writes what. When the show sucks overall, you're not going to get many good episodes. I tend to believe that staff writers are capable of great writing if given the opportunity.

I'll use DAYS as an example here. For most of Sheffer's tenure, the show was really bad and there were a ton of bad episodes - just pick and choose anything from Mid-Jan 2007 to July 2007. Then around September 2007 the show slowly started improving and the staff writers were able to write better episodes. Were those breakdown writers and script writers "crap" for writing episodes from Mid-Jan to July? I don't think so. They were given crap storylines to write. I'll use Beth Milstein, Meg Kelly, Fred Johnson, Judith Donato, Jodie Scholz, Bettina F. Bradbury, and yes, Casiello, as examples. They were on that DAYS writing team from Jan-July, so when they had the opportunity (September and later) to write something good, they did. Milstein wrote the breakdown for John's death episode (Oct 17) which I thought was just excellent (script by Donato). Then Casiello followed up with John's funeral (Oct 18/19) which was top notch, one of the best funeral's I've ever seen (script by Scholz). And then Johnson followed up that episode (Oct 19/22) some awesome Marlena/Belle/Sami & Phillip/Belle scenes (script by Bradbury). And Meg Kelly's January 16, 2008 episode (a script by Judith Donato) with John/Marlena in the hospital was really good. It was the same group of writers who wrote crap and then later wrote some really awesome stuff.

I trust the staff writers to do a lot of great work. I only wish they were given better storylines to write for. They've proven that when giving the chance, they'll knock it out of the park.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't really care about what the men are wearing, or not wearing.   What I care about is focusing on the writing and character development for each of the male characters. Andre really doesn't have a lot of character development that sets him apart from the other male characters except that he seems content to be degraded and mistreated by the elitist Dani.  I would like to know why a good looking younger guy like Andre would willingly be at the mercy of an emotional vampire such as Dani.   Martin, on the other hand, seems to have decent character development.. and it is partly due to how the actor chooses to recite his lines.  Martin was raised in a very privileged household and probably went to the best schools... so it makes sense that he would come across as thinking he was above everyone else.  Most people raised in a upper class situation as the Duprees would view themselves as better than others (it's the same trait Dani seems to employ on those she feels superior to). It makes me wonder how Nicole came out of that family being so warm and nurturing  when her family dynamics seemed very appearance oriented.    
    • I know, right. I after just re-reading the thread, I'm like ooppph!
    • Lulu and Dante were divorced before her coma, but she was still in love with him.  He just didn't know.  They haven't been married for years.    I was pretty mixed about Lulu getting involved when it was just a child out there in the world, but now that she realizes it's Gio I am okay with her telling Dante.  It also is her son's sibling.  I still think it's BLQ's choice though.  Lulu is in a rough spot because I think Dante will be mad if she keeps it a secret and Chase, Brook, Lois, etc will be mad if Lulu tells. Without veering too far into the classic area of the show, I had no problem with Robin telling AJ about Michael.  It may not have *exactly* been her place, but she could see how Carly was manipulating the entire situation.  It also ruined her romantic relationship with Jason for good.  Jason and Sonny were furious with Robin and practically ran her out of town, so I think we were to believe she was the bad guy.  It was a bit out of character for Robin to spill, but KMc was leaving the show.
    • Rewatching/binging THE X-FILES Seasons 1 and 2 (almost done). So much fun re-experiencing, especially re-discovering some of the monster-of-the-week stories. THE WEST WING Seasons 1 and 2 as well - so good to rewatch now with 20 years more life experience and understanding. ALSO.... lol FOOTBALLERS' WIVES Season 3, which is just as bonkers as I remember and so so so so fun. I had forgotten about that iconic season cliffhanger. Good times. Excited to rewatch Seasons 4 and 5 since I remember so very little about them. Hope you've been enjoying!
    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy