Jump to content

AMC: Monday 12.7.09


Recommended Posts

  • Members

And you can't tell me that a new story to kick off the "new era" in L.A., The Search For Dixie, would not get people back. Run promos of Tad, Jesse, Angie, Frankie, some new love interest for him, maybe Adam and Annie teaming up to look for Dixie and people would watch. At least I think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That sounds fantastic to me. I know quite a few old AMC fans who i bet would at least be interested enough to tune in for it.

I also think it would be a great story for AMC to use to take advantage of shooting outside in California. Since the show is set in PV they can have some fly out to LA on a tip that Dixie is there.

And those character... Tad, jesse, Angie, Dixie, Adam, Annie, Frankie are people the show should be promoting.

Whats the overall reaction to nuColby, is there on yet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Such a stupid empty threat! As if Barbara Walters would do an expose on a hotel for sticking to it's confidentiality policy. :wacko:

ITA about Aidan. I ended up ffing through most of his scenes.

I did stop to watch Susan & Alicia and yes, they did rock their scenes even if the material made no sense.

As for Tad & Liza, I hope they get together since at this point there is no other woman in Pine Valley to suit him.

I agree. Getting rid of Tad would be a big mistake because he is one of the tentpole characters. I don't think he's irredeemable at this point. The writers just need to remember who he is and bring more of the humor out.

I also liked Dixie & David because to me that story was about Dixie needing more out of life than being a housewife and she really started coming out of her shell. Unfortunately, once the story ended, Dixie went back to the same old rut with Tad. Having said that, I'd be thrilled if Dixie came back alive as long as the character was allowed to grow and her relationship with Tad was the focus instead of pushing her off on someone else like the writer did with Zach last time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think she's had enough material really yet--I think she's ok. Certainly better than either earlier Colbys at this point and I'm pleased that she hasa egit theatre background (Chorus Line revival) though am not completely sold. But I'll give her some time to warm into the role--they do seem to be writing her now as a bit bitchier again (maybe another reason for the recast--besides the obvious one)

The prob with a big "Search for Dixie" story is it would hvae to really seem new to work--I feel like we've had big "Dixie returns!" stories a few times now that have all been broken promises--I dunno if this would convince anyone otherwise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with everything... especially that! It's exactly how I feel about losing Stacy Haiduk (who I think would've been a great Liza recast). I loved her presence on the show, but since Hannah posed a threat to those insipid Zendall fans...:rolleyes:

I agree. Dixie's return came at probably the worst time. It was thick in the middle of the Unabortion Revelation and Madden in a Box. Nothing was enjoyable at ALL back then.

FORBIDDEN! :mad::mad:

Foolie Hambone Cowudders should be FORBIDDEN to take this show outside of the soundstage until the budget has millions of dollars in surplus. Felicia Minei Behr said one time back in the early 1990's that the minute you take the show one foot out of the studio, the costs triple. So, no! No, no, a resounding NO! I don't want to see All My Children takes Los Angeles, Encino, Bakersfield, wherever! The last thing we need to do is suggest more ways for a woman who is lousy with money to spend even MORE money when they're trying to SAVE money.

Hi, JP! :)

First, I think Tad's not irredeemable, but he's totally not credible. He tortured and killed a man, yet judges every last person in town for their sins that pale in comparison.

Second, as much as I want to blame the writer for everything -- and you know I do my best -- I tend to believe the rumors that Cady had kinda "suggested" they pair her with Zach if Dixie came back because she had wanted to work with Thorsten Kaye.

Plus, (I know, I know, no one's ever really dead on soaps), I think there should at least be some sense of finality for characters who die multiple times. I say if the actor comes back and plays the character as a ghost who interacts with many other people on the canvas, then that's it. The character is gone. I'll buy a twin sister, look alike cousin, or even a Sarah Brown/Claudia Zacharra situation if you want the actor back. But when ghosts save people from rooftop shootouts, lock their daughters in bathrooms until the mad man with a gun is gone, and sings lullabies to their son after mysteriously moving their pictures around the parlor... you're a done deal.

As much as Debbi Morgan's performance on the train tracks goes down in HISTORY as one of my absolute FAVORITE moments on this show... I, now, kinda wish the ghost rule applied to Jesse. I'm over Darnell and Jesse's ruined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jesse and Tad may be ruined but you just have to build them up again (or in Tad's case, fix him with Dixie and the family and then leave him in a support role). Fact is, Jesse, Angie, Tad and Dixie draw eyes. Fans did come back for Angie and Jesse, at least initially. And we need them here more than we don't. They are valuable tentpoles and a premiere black family on daytime.

As for Dixie the ghost, yeah, Jesse came back after changing history. So Dixie can do what she likes. I didn't think she needed to die either time, especially when they still had Maria in the ether the first time, waiting to come back as well. But it happened, it is what it is, Marlena's no stranger to this either over in Salem, or Jack Devereaux, so work with it, because I think the fact is fans will still come back to watch Dixie found. Maybe not enough, but some, and putting that family back together and regaining Cady McClain as a female lead in her own right, no longer an appendage to Tad, would be valuable to the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I heard that as well and I think they played that beat out somewhat recently when Jesse was covering for her to Frankie and Jesse, and the rest of the Hubbards got the wrong idea. So gross. But it was also IMO perpetuating a horrid stereotype to have him suddenly be a bigamist playing house when he was supposedly on the run for 20 years pining for Angie and Frankie everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy