Jump to content

Y&R- Lauren/Micheal/Phyllis spumor


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I would normally discount this but I am starting to see some patterns that are making this spumor a possibility.

It has been rumored for months that the character of Lauren would be getting a big fall sweeps story in order to kill her off a few months later. Well, now we are seeing Lauren in an emerging story.

Now, several boards have a "spumor" from an inside source that says the reason for the Lauren story is that MAB really wants to pair Michael and Phyllis as a couple. She's been chomping at the bit to free them both up for this big story of two best friends finding love after heartbreak. The source says that Nick is to be come obsessed over the Sharon/Adam relationship and that causes the final Phick breakup.

It's on SOC and Sony.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm okay with the Phick breakup.

I am not okay with killing Lauren. But all those vibes she's getting from Ryder...I believe that part too.

The thing I LEAST want to see is Phychael. Yuck. I never watched Will and Grace the first time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought Sandra Nelson Phyllis and CLB were hot, but then, that was a very different Phyllis. I still laugh when I think about that scene after she slept with Jack in his office, and you hear a buzzing sound. You can't help thinking, just for a second, that she's using a vibrator...then the camera moves to them and Jack is using an electric razor.

I think CLB and Michelle work with the friends vibe but I can't see them as a couple.

As for Lauren...well, she's a longtime character who helped make Y&R #1, so I guess she'd have to die, wouldn't she?

I hope they at least bring Traci back for the funeral. Just bring her back for every funeral. We can hear her talk about her great friendship with Devon when they off him next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, God... please don't let this happen! Especially the killing of Lauren. When I first started bitching about this regime's killing off of characters (Hope), I NEVER thought that it would continue to all it did... so that probably means this will happen as well. :wacko:

I get what you're saying, but the actor's sexuality should have nothing to do with how one judges a character relationship.

Michael is supposed to be straight, so CLB should be irrelevant in that sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember speculating a month or two ago that Y&R would probably be gearing up to kill Lauren for their February memorial service. They figure that just because Katherine's was a ratings hit that people want to see death and grief on a regular basis.

A big ugh to Micheal and Phyllis, this show has lost it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael and Phyllis are too gay to be a couple. They are like gurlfriends now that CLB stopped reigning it in and has been allowed to run wild. No way I'll buy them as a couple! Now Sandra Nelson and Michael? HOT!!! They'll never touch that. Also, killing Lauren off would be a huge mistake, but it makes sense for what these writers want to do. I expect a major character to die every few months, then be forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Which is what I was saying. But then again - if Mark watched Will & Grace, he would've realised how stupid this comparison is and how no way Phyllis could be Grace. They are a miles apart. Will and Grace weren't lovers, besides...

Completely :blink: comparison!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the Will & Grace comment is cute, it's not a big deal. On the contrary, the people running with it are making a big deal about it. It was a simple analogy. <_<

I like Michael & Lauren, but I'm not that passionate about them- I wouldn't have a problem with Michael & Phyllis as a couple. But not at the expense of killing off Lauren. I always thought Lauren & Paul had mucho chemistry, and should get back together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Watching the cult of Fetterman collapse is one of the few political bright spots for me. The best part  is watching all the people who built him up now decide they want to tear him down. I'll be fascinated to see how this ends for him. https://buckscountybeacon.com/2025/05/pennsylvanias-democratic-senator-john-fetterman-raises-alarms-with-outburst-at-meeting-with-union-officials/

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Long ago, this Rachel fan channel uploaded a number of clips of Rachel with Felicia during the alcoholism story, and this one in particular stands out for me. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      And then you have this scene, which is the dark mirror of the above, especially the final moment: By the late '80s, especially after Wallingford's death, those times were gone, and Donna Swajeski added further misery to Felicia with the Gold Street backstory. Luckily, after a bit of time the show found a good framing for this new twist on Felicia. The stories with finding and losing a love from her past, learning that a woman she hated was the daughter she'd spent years searching for, sinking into alcoholism, they all fit into the type of material suited for the '40s and '50s screen goddesses.  When Dano tried some of this old weepy type of material when she went back to ABC, it mostly fell flat, as the atmosphere wasn't the same and her character always felt shoehorned in. It worked perfectly at this period on AW because you had Iris, you had Rachel, you had Donna - you had a number of tough-but-vulnerable women of a certain age, most of them grandmothers by this point, but still trying to find love, find themselves. This is what AW could have had earlier if they hadn't dumped Pat and Alice, but better late than never. This is an approach you saw more often on British soaps than on US soaps, which for a number of years respected women in that age group. Both UK and US soaps have done away with this, both countries having the ladies devolve into perpetual ingenues (with added doses of endlessly self-aware camp in the UK) or just being shipped off entirely.  You could even see that on AW with the treatment of Iris (shipped off, never to be mentioned again, too old to return), Donna (repeatedly humiliated and crippled), Felicia (regressed into degrading herself with married John), Rachel (mother to newborn twins, put into lengthy periods of trauma through her new relationship with Carl). 
    • I'm of a certain age where I caught some of Upton's final year and it was not great but Jean Holloway was worse. All I remember is Bambi, Bambi, Bambi!
    • Yes, of course, all of those servants added to the overall picture at AW & also people had relationships with those servants! I like it when Anita asks after one of the servants at the club, how their children are doing & like that. 
    • Great scenes between Marlena and EJ today. Paula and Jeanne are making EJ have more depth than Ron had during his long drawn out tenure.
    • Might as well say it, Minority opinion, granted, but I like Joss & I'm okay with this WSB story & i hope that Emma will be their next recruit & she & Joss can be partners.
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven  The Arlene/Ben/Betsy triangle is one I wish I could see for myself as on paper it doesn't tend to excite me but I can see how well-constructed it was. I wish I could see the Rick/Meg relationship too, although I wish they'd had him genuinely fall for Meg after he gets together with Cal. The whole Brooke/Deacon/Bridget story on B&B was horribly damaging to Brooke as a character but it was dramatically very sound because I could completely believe Deacon would fall for messy and vulnerable Brooke after finally settling down with the more docile Bridget.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy