Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 5, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

One of the best stories--I seem to remember it took weeks--was when Traci had musical ambitious. Lauren was threatened, because she wanted to be Danny's top singer.

So Lauren arranged for Traci's musical teacher--with whom she practiced and practiced and did a beautiful version of The River--to tell Traci she had no talent!

And sweet insecure Traci believed it, and was crushed.

It was RIVETING TV, and it dragged out for weeks--but never dragged. (That's how I remember it).

Imagine if we could ever get a storyline like that again? Or even just of two teens/young adults who fall in love simply because they are in a tutoring relationship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

And that's one thing that made the Lauren/Traci dynamic so great. Lauren was the "beautiful one" but she was shallow, hollow. Traci was the one that everyone LIKED, and Traci was the one who was far and away the better singer (Bregman's singing was not impressive to say the least) So the rivalry between two women who were equally matched was riveting. Mark, I remember like yesterday the episode where she sang "The Rose"... and the teacher didn't say she couldn't sing..... he told her that she could carry a tune, but basically wasn't good enough to sing in front of people. And then Lauren's psycho fan club manager paid customers money to walk out in the middle of Traci's debut at the torchlight club. DIRTY DEEDS. But Traci ended up having triumph in the end, and that's what I loved about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You wouldn't have a story like that today because most soaps would feel ashamed of telling such a basic plot. They would want the type of fake, pseudo-aware attempts at hipness we get now. Bill Bell was a very earnest writer. He wasn't ashamed of going for basic emotions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, damn, I remember those scenes!

Especially the look on Traci's face after she was told she couldn't sing! It is frozen in my mind's eye. I mean, those were the kinds of episodes where I'd RUSH HOME to see "what happens next"? Not because of an explosion....or drowning...but I wanted to see how Traci overcame her heartbreak!

Yeah, but I suspect we're agreed that this is a huge mistake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Definitely. I don't mind sophisticated shows, but they need to have a heart. Somewhere along the line, a lot of soaps seemed to decide they could be glib and smug and full of people who were hard to care about, because viewers would want to feel cool. I feel this especially with GH and with Pratt's AMC, and with most Sheffer shows. It's a very anti-soap attitude.

In the old soap days, 30-35 years ago, ATWT was unfavorably compared by the press to DAYS and Y&R, because those shows were supposed to be more with it. Yet all of those shows were sustained by their earnesntess, their commitment to basic soap relationships, pacing, and storytelling. All good soaps have that, they're just different on the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think those stories were so good because they were so real. You could connect to them.

I remember when Traci was invited to the pool party by Lauren just to embarrass her. I was very tall and gawky at the time (5'10 at 14) and remember watching and crying for Traci and for myself because even though I did not have someone picking on me, I felt so insecure as a teen girl and shared those same feelings Traci had. I was so mad at Lauren back then. And there were girls like Lauren. Pretty girls who wore the latest fashions who were just brutal to other girls who were different or couldn't afford the latest fashions.

They also had teen actresses who were very good. Tracey Bregman said that her first close girlfriend was Beth and they would cry together when Lauren had to play a scene that was just so horrible to Traci because they took it too personally. But when they had their Christmas scene in Michael's dream last year, they just laughed at how mean Lauren was to Traci.

Those stories were things we could relate to unlike hysterical pregnancies or characters pushing thirty who never grow up and find themselves plotting one caper after another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember that like yesterday too, that pool party. Again, there was build-up, actualy party, and followup for days!

It also made Lauren's apology to Traci so meaningful to long-term fans. Sadly, I have this feeling that if the show were to do Kay's funeral again this year, one or both of them might not have attended (budget cuts), and the nod to history would not be made. There seems to be some difference in the operating philosophy this year. I wonder what changed--internally, in the team?

Yes. I'm really missing that now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It seems to have changed around the end of February and a few actors, both contract and recurring seemed to have been effected the most. Not only Lauren's but Michael's appearances are way down. Up to March, TEB was averaging about 6 shows a month and since then she is averaging 1 appearance a month. CLB is down to an average of 6 to 7 per month for the year and has at least forty fewer shows that the top performers. Look at Kristoff St John and Bryton McClure.

JT and Victoria and Gloria were being backburned but now have been put in play in various stories. Doug Davidson and now MTS are getting stories and play for now. Kristoff is being punished for speaking out, but CLB and TEB who have basically been towing the party line and not complaining publicly are still being ignored.

Yet, then they bring on recurring characters and play them heavily per story. Beth Maitland was great, but in about two months of work she will have almost as many appearances as Tracey Bregman for the year and her appearances were meaty not just three to four minute filler scenes like Lauren's. So while I think there has been some belt tightening as an excuse why we won't get scenes like the Lauren and Traci one at the funeral, it seems the writers are using this as an excuse to keep characters they really do not want to write for off canvas.

Look at Colleen's funeral. No way would Lauren and Michael have not wanted to pay their respects, yet once again they have Kevin and Jana there and not Michael and Lauren. Same as Lily's funeral and Kay's barbecue. Kevin and Jana have become the face of the family in Genoa City society per the writers. Is it all because of budget? I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Before we go to the next week's thread I wanted to say one last time that I really thought your banner for Colleen was a nice tribute to the character. I suppose I will miss the potential of the character more than the character herself, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rikaart should be happy because this writing team loves him.

Nope, she just looked on with approval. This is where it is not a budget issue but one of propping by the writers. They already had Kevin in Colleen's dream and then the Scoobies visiting her in the hospital. Why did Kevin and Jana need to be at the funeral? At the same time we had a few lines by Michael and Lauren saying how bad they felt for Colleen, Traci and even Jack weeks apart in their bimonthly appearances but that was it.

So why couldn't Lauren and Michael have been at the funeral? They should have been. They should have been representing the family but the writers are so blatant about replacing Michael and Lauren with Kevin and Jana that they do things like this. And then have a throwaway line about Michael and Lauren sending a nice card or calling with condolences. It is such BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I will miss what the character was, and (like you) what she could have been. Although maybe not, the way they ruined her at the end ("Colleen Gone Wild"). But JT/Colleen was one of my favorite teen romances, and I will miss that it could never mature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • It sure was!  With respect, how does that make sense?  These men are young, I don't see that. 
    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy