Jump to content

Y&R Episodes Discussion, Week of October 5, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah allow me to theorize. Billy vs Adam or Nick. Ashley vs Nikki (throw Victoria somewhere int he mix with Abby caught in the middle) and Jack vs. Adam or upto something. i wonder how they are trying to set it up with EB temp out the mix (I don't think that's gonna last)

NOOOOOOOOO!!!! (for me) He's bland and boring Sharon has too many issues she needs an interesting lead male character opposite the character to have the story be interesting. The only reason y Nick no longwer cuts it is well, because we are mostly tired of the same old tune. Mac as written now is another Vicki she needs to be redeveloped properly and a mature woman character. JT won't help that maybe I'lls ee him in a good pairing if the character is given a lil bit more spice though I did see him with Colleen but tptb took away that vision

PB is next ont he target list I'm sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Kudos to the team for bringing back Beth and allowing her center stage.

It was so refreshing to see a veteran character,a 'middle age',plus size woman taking the lead,and bringing it home.

Traci should definitely stay on in a revived Jabot/Abbott storyline.

A pity we didn't see flashbacks of Colleen's birth.

Thank God Ashley is being presented as a stronger woman.It seems the whole breakdown will be forgotten,now she is a mother.

If they had to go the baby switch route,I think it would have worked better had Adam developed an obsession for Ashley because of her kindness,and she had a phantom pregnancy from the beginning,with Adam switching babies to save her the painful reality.

We need to see Ashley questioning the delivery.

Now that the transplant,baby switch and Patty's reign of terror are over,the show has a chance to go in a new positive direction.

Please,please,please get rid of Amber and the whole story.

Start writing for Mac,Chloe,Chance,Noah.

Have Paul investigate Patty's past and have him and Lauren grow closer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good heavens too funny!!!! :lol::lol: Actually from my perspective it is Sharon who needs to be stable..doesn't she have a teenager she needs to take care of, find a home, get a job, pick up a hobby or something. Watching the writers pass around the Sharon character for the past few years is like watching someone trying on pairs & pairs of shoes that are two sizes too small!! :blink:

I cannot stand the character but I would give the writers my left eye if they can make her interesting and not the same one note character that she has been for well over a decade now. Though I am not going to lie, I love the Nick Newman obsession story for so many reasons!! :lol: I mean Y&R comes on, cue Sharon and her WOE IS ME and CRYING!! If rumors are true and there is a Sharon and Adam pairing that just might cure me of my carpal tunnel syndrome whenever the character appears (it gets really hard when you have to press & hold the FF button).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark, that's only really a problem in coastal states, as some sea birds mistake floating deflated balloons for jellyfish, and try to eat them. In Wisconsin, that's not any kind of an issue as a balloon would never reach the ocean. You'd be surprised how animals choke and die on even natural things. Cows choke all the time on Hedge apples, but they still keep eating them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just hope she knows how many fans were affected by her performance.

Back when I started with Y&R I could watch the show -- and I would usually just watch. Like a pretty painting. Everything was very well put together and impressively crafted. There were a lot of characters, even if I liked them, I had no real reaction towards. Traci, she was always a character who made me feel her pain or her joy. Even all this time later, it's the same. With Traci, I'm not bored, or annoyed, or sad about wasted potential. I just feel what she is feeling. It's what soaps should be about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We should send in some scripts where Traci falls in love with Daniel, finds Deacon irresistible, and frequently screams in frustration as her plans to keep the valuable first edition of Flowers in the Attic all to herself are foiled by Victoria, who says the book oddly inspires her. Traci then makes plans with Steve, dressed up as Estella and Miguel, to steal the very valuable blue plate hanging in Victor's (or as he will now be known, "Mr. N") ranch house.

Look out Adrienne Frantz and Judith Chapman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Still here ^^ Come on Prime Video, it's due to bring it back!
    • Got through the eighth season, and it was... painful. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree 100% with both you and Mitch64.  Soaps have been going further and further off-course since 1981. TPTB just don't have a fundamental understanding of what makes soap fans so loyal. I'd love to be on a writing team with both of you.  Maybe we could put together a real soap opera, and show people what its all about...  
    • They weren't in town, but Fletcher worked at the paper (and we saw anniversary Journal headlines for the 50th, although I don't remember if Roger was one of them), and I'd think Alex would have at least heard of him due to the damage he did to Spaulding only a few years before her return to the fold. I know I have to remember it's not real life, of course.
    • YES. The videos being uploaded to Spauldingfield are almost to the point where Alan is reintroduced. They're already talking about the guy he pretends to be, and yes, he returns at a masked ball. In fact, that masked ball is almost beat for beat the same as the masked ball where Alex was introduced! Get a new schtick. Before the Kobe era, that's pretty much what they did. Characters would just show up. Maybe other characters would talk about them for a while--the Chamberlains, Tony, Maureen, Andy, Kelly, Carrie--but then they would just appear. When Hope came back, she simply knocked on Bert's door and said something like, "Hi, Grandma, I'm home again." No particular fanfare. Sometimes it would be a bit dramatic--Jennifer and Morgan were introduced when Mike accidentally crashed into their car, for instance, and Alan and Elizabeth were introduced through Jackie's flashbacks when she was remembering giving up Phillip for adoption. Nola was involved in the Roger return. Roger's return in 1980 was very dramatic, but in a way that made total sense. He was trying to kidnap a child, so dressing up as a clown did not seem crazy. The mask bit was not only silly, it didn't even make sense. Alex never knew him, so there was no reason for him to be masked in front of her. Yeah, she knew OF him, but there's that phenomenon called cognetive dissonance. If you see someone outside of an expected situation, you probably won't recognize them, especially if you never met them in person and think they're dead. I bet a CIA spook like Roger would be familiar with that concept. And he didn't have to be skulking around SF for months. Again, I will cut Long a little slack--it was not her idea to bring back Roger, she was told to do it. She never wrote for the character. It was something that was not planned. They originally went to Zaslow to offer him the role of Alan. He, of course, turned them down because that was a ridiculous idea, but then he suggested coming back as Roger. At such short notice, it's not strange his return was not handled well.
    • Eh...but neither had been in town. Know the name Roger Thorpe? Sure. But Alex would have gone crazy trying to memorize all of Alan's co-conspirators/lovers/wives and Fletch didn't even know Roger/Adam was on the island, IIRC. But who knew or should've known each other is always a little dicey when people come back to town. 
    • I wouldn't call Tomas' cuts a modern cut. They appear to be a slim/extreme slim cut⏤cut slimmer down the sides, with a higher armhole, which pulls up/out, depending on the fit of the person's body. Again, I feel like Ms Featherstone is buying to fit the wrong parts of the body; instead of buying to fit their widest parts (shoulders), she's buying things to fit their middle/waist (which is the easiest to ultimately fix without a complete re-cut), and it shows in the finished product. And the only reason it irks me is because I worked in suit sales for nearly ten years, and I notice these things immediately. The fashion(s) on this soap are miles ahead of three of the four others (I like the fashions from Y&R), but the tailoring is a choice, especially where the men are concerned.
    • There probably would have been a good chance they knew of him, especially with his ties to Spaulding and his being involved in so much scandal (meaning there would be plenty of photos and articles around they both would have seen), but I agree the mask was silly, clearly just a TV moment.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I think all the suits are fit too tight, except for Jon Lindstrom's. DC lawyers/doctors are not all LA fashion elites. Yes, maybe Tomas would have a more modern cut to his suit, but an established guy like Bill wouldn't go around looking like that lonely button on his jacket was ready to explode constantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy