Jump to content

Predict the Order in Which the Soaps Will Be Cancelled


Recommended Posts

  • Members

When it comes to the topic that I just raised, we obviously need to start by predicting which soap will be cancelled first. And, usless somebody has the IQ of a fruitfly, it is apparent that the only two soaps in immediate danger of cancellation are ATWT and OLTL.

I personally think that OLTL will go first, for a variety of reasons (despite the fact that OLTL does better in the ratings and demos): First of all, after Frons re-located AMC to California, but didn't do the same for OLTL, it became painfully obvious that OLTL's cancellation is imminent (meaning that it will go either in 2010 or 2011). Second, even after GL's cancellation, CBS is still a more soap-friendly network than ABC. Third is the fact that P&G seems to like to "space out" the cancellations of its soaps (witness the gaps inbetween the cancellations of SFT, AW, and GL), and therefore may make it really difficult for CBS to cancel ATWT. And last, but not least, is the fact that ATWT has far more name recognition than OLTL. (Honestly, the only factor that seems to be going in OLTL's favor is that fact that its cancellation would create a "gap" in between AMC and GH; to avoid this, I'm assuming that AMC will move to OLTL's old timeslot, even though such a move could be devastating to its ratings.)

If I had to guess, ATWT will be cancelled in 2012 or 2013. At this point in time, it becomes much tougher to predict the order of cancellation, although I will attempt to do so below:

3. AMC: This soap probably will be next in line, simply because it neither gets the ratings attained by Y&R & B&B, nor has the "buzz" (and the huge soap media bias in favor) of GH & DOOL. Additionally, I predict that the move to L.A. won't save nearly the amount of money that Frons expects it to. (Of course, if this world was completely fair, AMC would actually be cancelled before OLTL, given that the latter soap appears by all objective measures to be more profitable. Unfortunately, Frons and other industry "experts" are under the impression that AMC is some sort of national treasure worth saving while OLTL is disposable.)

4. B&B: This may surprise some of you, since B&B is still the second most watched soap. However, the fans of GH and DOOL are absoulte fanatics while the same cannot be said about B&B fans in this country (although internationally, B&B does attract a lot of fanatical supporters). And of course, the soap media won't do much to save B&B (while they will move heaven and earth to save DOOL and GH). Furthermore, given how much B&B's ratings have eroded over the past couple of years, it really wouldn't surprise me if it fell behind DOOL and GH in viewership five years from now. (B&B sure doesn't do itself any favors in this department by continuing on ad nauseum with Brooke, Ridge, and their problems with Stephanie; this is the same damn story they've been telling from the beginning, and the show's sole focus on it makes it impossible for the soap to grow creatively.)

By this juncture, the two soaps in imminent danger of cancellation (DOOL & GH) will nonetheless still be extremely difficult to get rid of. As I've indicated earlier, fans of these shows are absolute fanatics that will not let their shows go quietly. And, the soap magazines will do everything they can to save both shows because WITHOUT BOTH DOOL AND GH, THOSE RAGS WILL IMMEDIATLEY GO OUT OF BUSINESS. (As a side note, it's really sickening that--by contrast--the soap media didn't/doesn't give a rat's ass about the cancellations of EON, SFT, AW, GL, OLTL, & ATWT.) However, one of these two shows will go next, and I precict it will be:

5. DOOL: I think that this soap will go before GH simply because of the NBC/ABC factor (regarding how each of those networks has historically looked at the soap genre).

Then, of course, the next to be cancelled will be:

6. GH: However, I predict that it will be about ten years--at the very least--before both GH and DOOL are finally gone.

Finally, the last soap to be cancelled will be:

7. Y&R: This one's a no-brainer. Although I am not certain as to when Y&R will meet its demise, I predict that it still will be around to celebrate its 50th anniversary in 2023.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah, what is the point of this topic? To me, it's the equivalent of a group of people who stop at a car accident, and take bets on if the injured person will live or die? Does that make you a soap fan? Not in my book. A "true" soap fan would be fighting for survival. The worst thing about the advent of the internet, in regards to soaps, are all these backseat quarterbacks. They ALWAYS know what would be better, and obviously get their jollies by complaining. I am in no way saying soaps are perfect, but I love the genre, and can find as many things to get excited about as to bitch about.

Unfortunately, the web boards seem to attract mostly the negative. A good friend's mom, who lives in Oklahoma, who is a 30 year fan of soaps, told me she got shouted off a variety of message boards because she said she LIKED things. She said she was called stupid, ignorant, and much worse. She stopped posting.

I used to read SON a lot... but I have unfortunately had the same experience as my friend's mom. On one site, there were hundreds of posts ridiculing a soap for it's awful work... but it turned out, NONE of the naysayers had actually watched the show. All the bitchy comments were based on one posters one line summaries. I wrote a post, saying I disagreed. That if you actually haven't watched the show... maybe you shouldn't be criticizing it. MAN! Within an hour, I had sixty angry comments. Some likened me to Hitler. Others expressed their extreme "hurt" at anyone saying bad things about them.

Whaaaaaat? Posters, claiming to be long-time soap fans, who DON'T watch the shows and BADMOUTH everything... were horrified that I had called them out for criticizing the show without watching...

Just bizarre to me. Yeah, every soap could be improved. But this odd subculture that people get to criticize EVERY SINGLE THING.. whether they've watched or not? And yet, if you turn the tables, they runaway and cry like 3 year olds...?

So no. I won't respond to this topic. But I do have a question... what are all the negative bitches who thrive on predicting failure for soaps going to criticize once all their soaps are gone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sactownfan, that was an extremely rude and personal attack that was completely uncalled for. If this topic bothers you, then fine; don't respond to it. But, like it or not, this is a topic that some may actually believe is worthy of discussion. And, these cancellations are going to happen sooner rather than later, so to not talk about it is to ignore reality (no matter how depressing and upsetting some may find this topic to be).

To tell you the truth, I really don't mind if all of the remaining soaps are cancelled tomorrow, since they have become completely unwatchable pieces of crap. However, unlike your accusation, I do love the soap genre; however, I only love traditional daytime drama--with quality actors and plots--which sadly no longer exists.

Jonathan brought up the point as to how we can get these soaps to survive. Unfortunately, the only way to do that is to completely return to the quality storytelling of decades past. Because TPTB refuse to do this, I'm afraid that cancellation is all but inevitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Max,

Thanks for your response. It only served to illustrate my point. People who BITCH about soaps on boards can say anything... but if you CHALLENGE them at any point.. they cry foul, immediately.

My post was rude? How? Did I call him fat? Obnoxious? Stupid? Or any other word that posters will HAPPILY call actors and staff of any soap?

What was "personal" about my "attack?" I didn't say anything about the poster "personally." I just DISAGREED. Yes, soaps are worthy of discussion. But the same goes for those on the boards. You can't say "something sucks" without expecting an opposite response.

And again, my goal isn't to offend anyone. If you can tell me what I said that was "rude"... I'd be happy to hear it. Honestly. I'm just hear because I love soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sactownfan,

I perhaps went too far in saying that you were rude; I just got upset when you suggested (or at least that's the way I interpreted it) that I did not love the soap genre. I do love it, but in a different way (as I explained above) than most others probably do. My honest belief is that if there appears to be no realistic chance that soaps will return to how they once were, then it is the best interest of each soap to go off the air (before further damage is done).

Your point regarding the fact that soap message boards are highly negative in tone is a valid one. Even though I myself am culpable here (since my posts are mostly negative), I sometimes get sick of the negativity as well. (Specifically, I get tired of all the posts which trash the EPs and HWs, simply because I believe that such people really no longer have all that much power but are instead told by executives what to do.)

I sincerely apologize for upsetting you tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Max,

Thanks for the apology. That's not why I wrote, but is still, sincerely appreciated. I guess my overall point is... how can we CHANGE things? Yes, daytime ratings are down. Just like they are for primetime. So all the people who act like it's the 80s and that soaps rule and get to do anything, if only the EP or Head writer knew what to do... are just not paying attention to reality...

So how do we fix this? And again, that's why I first posted. I am not interested in complaining... I want to suggest things to fix things!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When I saw this thread I knew you were going to get jumped on. There are always going to be people who think that if we don't mention the possibility that soaps are dying then everything will be just fine. It's whistling past the graveyard.

I used to be one of the first ones in a "how does daytime need to change" thread but now I simply no longer care. Soaps are dying but the audience for serial drama is still out here and many of us are willing to see what comes next. One of the things that I've been most pleased by has been the generally lukewarm response to Jay Leno's 10:00 show because its showing NBC that the audience for the scripted drama won't just shift to talk shows. But just because we won't watch Leno doesn't mean ER had to stay on FOREVER.

Daytime is in a state of transition and we have no choice but to ride it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This post is exemplary. It is really nice to see two people have a disagreement and then resolve it with a sincere apology and a sincere acceptance of said apology all in the space of a couple posts. Kudos to maturity, it's a pleasant surprise and a nice change!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

AMC-2010

ATWT-2010

OLTL-2011/2012

GH-2012/13

The rest I think will last through at least 2012-2014 or longer

AMC if they want the show to last, moving it to LA ain't going to make one damn difference as long as Pratt is there. OLTL I can see lasting longer cause it's demos are better than AMC's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jodie stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Oh God, she's back? I thought those first scenes were well-intentioned but hysterical.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy