September 25, 200916 yr Member Yes, but LML knew that. MAB THINKS her show is Y&R, but it's really not. ICAM!! I truly hope they are heading somewhere with all this...I want to be hopeful.
September 25, 200916 yr Member Some people had to see Y&R everyday under Rainbow Hack LML. I stop watching after people got fired & she got rid of the old writers. & others like me must have stop watching because her ratings went down after awhile. Both LML & MAB needs to give up writing they have done nothing.
September 25, 200916 yr Member I think he also happens to fit Sheffer's idea of what a man should be. Yep. Which is as bad as Higley's idea of feminism.
September 25, 200916 yr Member I think it's funny how chastized MAB is. I remember the hatred for LML. I personally think they are both awful and would not pick either. Both bred awfulness during their respective reigns. Maybe they need to hire Charles Pratt away from Frons at ABC or better yet, Bob Guza. MAB did correct a couple of things during her tenure, Jill and Kat as mom and daughter but it's amazing how just a few months ago, Y&R seemed to be on a more creative upswing. Not great but better. Maybe I was fooling myself. Edited September 25, 200916 yr by JaneAusten
September 25, 200916 yr Member Can you imagine Margaret on Y&R? [Katherine Chancellor] Dear God In Heaven [/Katherine Chancellor] Maybe they need to hire Charles Pratt away from Frons at ABC or better yet, Bob Guza. That's just crazy talk!
September 25, 200916 yr Member That's just crazy talk! At least Pratt wouldn't hide behind Bill Bell's legacy.
September 25, 200916 yr Member LML's show WASN'T Y&R. It may not have been what you thought Y&R should be, but it was entertaining. Something the show currently isn't close to.
September 25, 200916 yr Member I would enjoy seeing Higley's reaction when Rauch tells her that he will not recast Dru with Renee Elise Goldsberry.
September 25, 200916 yr Member At least Pratt wouldn't hide behind Bill Bell's legacy. He would lock it in a panic room.
September 25, 200916 yr Member It may not have been what you thought Y&R should be, but it was entertaining. It may have been what you consider to be "entertaining", but it wasn't Y&R. Something the show currently isn't close to. That's comparing herpes to crabs.
September 25, 200916 yr Member Evey time LML was interviewed she constantly talked about changing this or changing that. She obviously didn't care about the show Y&R was from its inception to when she took over. She wanted to mold it into something else, and she freely admitted it. Maria and Company on the other hand? They constantly talk about how they're doing Bill Bell proud and how their show is classic Y&R, when it's not. They intentionally hide behind Bill Bell's legacy to manipulate viewers. The show is unrecognizable, but unlike Latham, they won't admit to it or to changing the core story format of the show. They think this mess is what Y&R has always been like and should be like. They're really living in denial. Edited September 25, 200916 yr by Y&RWorldTurner
September 25, 200916 yr Member I don't like either I don't know if MAB is persuaded by Sheffer and Hamner but it is not good. LML was not better, she has preposterous storylines, changing idenities and we all know who was who and that couldn't have been done, what we saw the history and there was not time for it. MAB is still carrying the Art storylines to, ENOUGH.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.