Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Great question! I think Lauren Koslow has the right combination of sensuality and smarts to be good in the role of Rita, and if they'd snatched her up after she left B&B in 1992 (and before she started Days in 1996), that could have generated good stories for Ed and the newly returned Alan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I think if you couldn't get Lenore there wasn't much reason for the character to return. What was left for her - a secret child with Ed? That could have been compelling but with two actors who had never played out the original Ed/Rita story, I'm not sure. She had an ugly history with Roger but Holly already had that story. Chris Bernau was, sadly, no longer with us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have gone with it..as I posted before I would love to see Poser as Rita's daughter, who Rita lies and says is Alan's but is really Eds..so we have a Bauer with  a really bad attitude slinking around town doing her best to sully the name.."Roger, do me quick, I have to go to some boring potluck by the pool."

What about Judith Chapman (ex-Natalie on ATWT..I never saw her on YR)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even if they recast around the time of Chris' '86 return? They could've cast someone really allowed to go at Reva, instead of throwing Vanessa in the role of also-ran. Rita could've come back with Alan's child...oh boy, imagine Rita fighting for a piece of Spaulding against Alex.

Granted the writing around '86 is mostly crap, and the casting iffy. I don't know if the audience would've accept anyone else in the role.  But I think there would've always been a place on the canvas for Rita. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Anything I've seen of Chapman is hammy but she may have been better in past years. 

I do see what you mean about Toby Poser as Rita's daughter. 

It might have been more interesting if Rita had been the madam, not Amanda. And maybe Rita had the past with Matt. I don't know if the show would have remembered (probably not as it was never mentioned in later years) but when Ed and Vanessa dated, it was made clear he was only interested in her because she reminded him of Rita. 

I actually did like Kathleen Cullen (although I haven't seen her full run) and I blame the writing for regressing her and making her so passive (by the time she became stronger she was written out), but I think Toby Poser could have made the part work if given the proper chance. The biggest problem is there was just no reason to bring Amanda back. I liked the idea of expanding the Spauldings, but as years have passed, I've realized I did not actually care about the Spauldings as a family. I cared about Alex when Bev played her, and Alan when Chris played him, and yes there were some compelling moments here and there with their ties to Philip (or rarely, with Alan-Michael), but they just weren't compelling as a unit. Laibson/McTavish just dumped them all together. I think it was SOD at the time who named "A. Spaulding" as the worst story of the year and pointed out that every person in the family was written the same way. 

Amanda chasing after Ross could have been compelling, but it wasn't a fair triangle, because he never had feelings for her on her return and the writing dehumanized her. Liz Keifer even said in print how uncomfortable she was with some of the comments they had her make about Amanda and her hair. 

That was also the problem with the whole Malibu Madam story. It was treated as a joke and Amanda was treated as a joke. The world that Amanda would describe Matt living in - essentially his cute little ass poolside in Speedos, property of rich housewives only - was more like one of those glossy late '80s miniseries than the reality of him being an escort.

It would have been more interesting if he had revealed he'd had sex with men for money and certainly forced Vanessa to ask herself a lot of questions about trusting so much in the power of love and so on. 

 

That could have worked, yes, in the time Chris had left on the show. 

(hopefully she wouldn't have been there when RVV still played Ed)

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Rita comes back to Springfield claiming the child she had after leaving town was Ed's, but eventually it is revealed to be Alan's (she's seen what Alan has done to his children and want her son to have no part of that). Perfect opportunity would've been the mid 80s, or perhaps the early 90s, where Rita's son would butt heads with Alan-Michael, perhaps form a bond with Ed, be someone new that Bev's Alex wanted to dote upon (other than Nick).

Yeah, Rita's son would've been a better Spaulding than what we had to endure with Nick McHenry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do remember watching some early Vanessa stuff that seemed like they were ticking off the "brunette schemer" boxes. I've just seen so little of Vanessa/Ed that it's hard to judge what the attraction was. The way the recaps made it sound was that he saw a lot of Holly in her after her (fake) suicide attempt. And Vanessa wasn't above pushing that narrative to land him.

I get what you mean re: the Spauldings. They're never a cohesive family unit. They're usually too busy fighting each other to ever pull together.

There's a lot of GL history I'd forgotten, and I gladly could've lived never being reminded of Matt's. *eyeblech*

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The Producers Guild of America (PGA), while not a union, does have rules and regulations regarding membership, conduct, and yes, credits. Assuming she’s a member of course. Being uncredited for what work exactly? Given her years of experience and multiple Emmy wins - why now decide you want to go uncredited for work you’ve done? 
    • That's very sad. What party he represented for and which area he represented? 
    • -- Daisy is a terrible name. If you're not going with a family legacy name, you gotta do better than that. -- When Frank is done with a character, he makes sure that character is painted in the worst possible way and the shade is thrown in the script. Natalia is being treated like a punchline to a bad joke....not that I mind. -- So Cody talked about Britt today. Gee, I wonder what's going on.
    • I remember another Phyllis residence -- I don't think that was a set shown abovethread, but I'm not sure.  Trying to remember some things off the top of my head but I might be wrong about part of it: I'm referring to the condo where Phick first had sex after the Michael/Lauren wedding.  I think they specifically referred to it as a condo?  After Stafford's Phyllis went into a coma, Jack sold it and I think he gave money to HunterKing's Summer when she married Austin? Or he gave Summer the condo?    There was a convoluted side plot about someone needing money and something from this was drawn in a shady way.  Something about it being sold?  And then when GinaT's Phyllis awoke from her coma, she had no condo to come back to.
    • Which union rules? SMH. Jill’s back, uncredited. 
    • Yeah I don’t get why she wouldn’t be credited if she’s back. That seems odd. I hope it’s true though, because the show needs a change. Badddddd.
    • The casino scenes came out of nowhere in comparison to the rest of the week, but at least there was some movement in the storyline. Joey has really made a fool of Vanessa. Chelsea is really embarrassing herself with this doctor. The desperation is so obvious and she clearly gets that from Dani. Hayley was giving Donna Logan vibes because that is how Donna acted when Eric had a heart attack. Stealing potential evidence is not going to reflect well on Kat and might throw the case against Leslie. Tomas had no business in Eva's hotel room even if he did shut down her advances. But I think they still might end up together at some point because the book that Eva gave him is the same one Kat called basic which seemed like foreshadowing.
    • So Sharon decides not to go to France and stay behind to support Mariah, but now with Phyllis gloating about getting an invite I’m sure she’ll change her mind.    Mariah’s secret is that she screwed that old man? I’m so confused about what’s going on here, and Mariah coming out and telling Tessa that she can’t know her secret is supposed to do what exactly? Is that supposed to put Tessa’s mind at ease? Lol…. I’m getting Cameron Kirsten vibes though. Did he do something to her without her consent and things went too far? These writers really can’t come up with something original if their life depended on it 
    • Eve and Thomas have so much in common--they both like reading (print and audio books) and wow they both like reading *fiction*!  (Also I would never pick up a book called Mercy and Goodness yawn

      Please register in order to view this content

      )
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy