Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I do believe one of the ITL's was what Jordan submitted the year he won. And I agree, some worked, others not so much. I think it might've been more practical to do one really good one a month, rather than 1 good, 2 mediocre and one stinky one a month. 

It was only like a line, and a curious shout-out, given how long it had been since Sonni had been on the show. Maeve's only in it briefly, but it's fun for me because she's in a fur coat, and older viewers might've gotten the sly reference to Vanessa's early man-chasing days.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

It's hard for me to judge that period because we only have two episodes - I do think Charlotte's "suicide" aftermath episode is decent. The other is not great, in part because of everyone narrating, as you mention. Based on all the panning of Cenedella from Lemay's book (admittedly not the best source), and the issues with Lipton as a writer, some of the problems don't surprise me. 

I don't have a problem believing these three women would want Joe. One was crazy, one was a desperate schemer, and Sara didn't exactly have great taste in men (Joe was one of her better choices). I think Call was able to show his quiet charisma on OLTL. He's not playing much of a character here.

The parts about Leslie's mother are clunkier to me.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not sure if you're referring to Wheeler having plans for this after the cancellation, or before the cancellation.  But I do have some intel about something along those lines she wanted to do before the show was cancelled.  

After Wheeler had been given permission to go with the new production model, and she was ready to roll with it full time (the show had actually been experimenting with hand-held shaky cameras and more outdoor shooting, etc, for several months before they went "full steam ahead") -- so when the decision was made, Wheeler made a big deal about rebooting the show with sort of a "premiere" episode.  Lots of fans probably remember that episode and how it was promoted on CBS.  Wheeler's original intent was to re-number GL's episodes -- and begin the show all over again by numbering that new production model "premiere" as Guiding Light episode # 1.  I never heard or read that she literally wanted to rename the show, The New Guiding Light, but perhaps that was in her plan also.   Anyway, regarding the re-numbering  of episodes -- ultimately P&G refused to allow Wheeler to re-number the episodes, so she was unable to make it episode #1, as she had wanted.   

I'm not sure I've really answered your question, but I do remember that Wheeler was keen on completely rebooting the show, and essentially starting from scratch.  And she would have done so, had P&G not stopped her.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, Jonathan's story is basic soap trope. He was the previously unknown child who has been treated miserably & he's come to get his revenge on the people who abandoned him to such a monster. This tale has been told so many times. And, Tom Pelphrey was such a find.

Now, Sebastian is a totally different thing. Wheeler's big mistake with Sebastian was waiting & hoping Peter Simon would change his mind. He wasn't going to & she needed to recast & keep moving.  When Sebastian had Holly in a cell & tried to make her kiss him I knew we were in a heap of trouble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have been curious to see what would happen - probably nothing great, to be honest, but seeing her try a brand new show, maybe even have the actors as new characters, could have been interesting. 

The idea of going back to episode #1 is something comics like to do. I'm not a fan. Is Wheeler a big comic fan?

Russell T. Davies also did that with Doctor Who last year, which did nothing for the show whatsoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Re: 1973 GL. I know it was the 70's, but that yellow painted woodwork in Mike & Leslie's house was outrageous and the plaid couch. Poor Leslie looked like she was being styled like Pat Nixon. Several posters on youtube were woofing at Mike in his tight yellow polo shirt and referring to him as a Daddy. Don Stewart was being propped as GL heartthrob during that era. I read Stewart was very difficult and a bit conceited. The scenes with Kit were a bit camp especially when she is sneaking around outside Charlotte's and runs off.

The second episode with all the technical issues was a bit hard to get through. I found Lynne Adams as Leslie flat compared to Rodell's version. I read she was fired to make way for Adams return.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I do not believe Wheeler's intent was ever to have the actors playing new characters.  She just wanted to reboot the show with existing characters/actors, and sort of pretend it was an entirely new Guiding Light.   I think that was an attempt to get media attention (which partially did work) and attract new viewers.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, regardless of who's idea the new production model was, ultimately P&G had to agree to it.  So I could have began, After P&G had agreed to the new production model... 

And to be clear, I did not intend to sound particularly critical of Ellen Wheeler.  I have always been empathetic with the very difficult position she was in.  I was really just trying to share what I recall about her desire to re-number GL's episodes and more-or-less reboot the show -- in reference to another poster's question.   But Wheeler did the best she could in an impossible situation.  And GL was used as a guinea pig with the new production model.  Bad for GL, but ultimately GL's failure prevented other soaps from following the same path, which I'm sure other soaps would have eventually done.  

Edited by Mona Kane Croft
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is so confusing. So will CBS and P.Plus just be a day ahead for the rest of the episodes the whole week? 
    • April 15, 1993 is when they first meet. 
    • Does anyone know the air date when Victoria & Cole first meet? Was there a scene when Victoria was sitting on Cole's lap and kissed him? If so, does anyone know the air date?    
    • When is the last time Bridget & Deacon scene happened?
    • Surely that was a joke. Why would anyone seriously ask if Dani had any rooms besides having a bedroom? MOST of the time when we see her, she's in that open, airy, white room with her kitchen far stage left & there's an island & a love seat.  I have meant to post to say how taken I was with Eva last Thursday. You don't know it but I have  not really gotten into either Eva or Leslie/Sheila/Anna/Dana/Mom in the same ways or degrees most of y'all have.  With "Many Names" I get that it's quite a challenge to play that evil & that crazy without becoming cartoonish & she hasn't, so there is that. But, I do not see layers or nuance. I also do not fault the actress. If the gray tones are not there on the page, I don't expect to see them ripped out of thin air. With Eva there were so many questions. Now most have been answered.
    • No kidding. It’s amazing to me that CBS as messy as it was for the 97-98 season landed at #2 that year thanks to Sunday nights, 1/2 of the Monday night lineup, Diagnosis Murder on Thursdays, and oddly the Saturday night line-up. I think CBS was saved by the Winter Olympics not to mention ABC had gotten even messier than CBS’ mess.  CBS came out a more solid for #2 for the 98-99 season but was still very uneven overall. Outside of Sundays the rest of the network’s hits were on checkerboard split between Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays.    Had it not been for Who Wants to Be a Millionaire fever I’d say CBS probably would’ve been at #2 for the 99-00 season as well, very much still uneven but of course Survivor and CSI were on the horizon. (*There’s some evidence that CBS may have barely eked out a win for #2 for the 96-97 season but that season’s mess sure doesn’t feel that way)
    • By request, I present to you "Abbott Communications".  
    • Meh, I'm a bit tipsy after coming from a Mother's Day festivity. I should have posted a picture of her and Andre in her little great room.
    • Their question was does she only have a bedroom lol
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy