Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Members

For example??? 

And, about Ellen Weston, from me all there is or ever could be is a HARD PASS

She didn't even know how to be interviewed as a writer. You simply do not rewrite the backstories of 5 veteran male characters accusing them of no other than cold-blooded murder. And sock puppet? GMAB!!! Trying to tell story? In whose universe?! I'll give you mean-spirited, the death of Ben Reade? How much meaner could it have been?

 

 

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Honestly, having the girls threatened by some common, unknown enemy of the men wasn't a bad idea. I always thought that each of the men, having one piece of the puzzle but not knowing the others were involved (aside from Josh and Billy of course) could've worked. 

Part of the reason the Eli Simms story worked (although I understand the criticisms of it) was that only one of the men really had an established history on the show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But the Eli Simms story did not work!  Aside from the fact that it was well crafted (but full of historical inaccuracies).  The Eli Simms plot implied that all five of those old men had been in or near Springfield 25 years earlier -- which the history of Bill Bauer and HB Lewis (at least) told us was not true.   

The Maryanne plot was basically a re-tread of Eli Simms. A story which implied that four or five middle-aged men (current characters on the show) had all been in Springfield 25 years earlier, which the audience knew was impossible. Every single one of those men had moved to Springfield at different times, over the former 25 years.  It was a decent plot, but it conflicted with the history of the show.   Square peg in a round hole, so to speak.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The only character's history really "tweaked" was Bill Bauer's. (in the 50's I'm not even sure where Guiding Light takes place, is it still in Selby Flats?)  Tom and Brandon were never really characters on the show. Henry had only been on the show for three years. HB was just starting. I'm not sure what you're referring to when you say HB's history wasn't true.

Yes, there were logic problems. And they really should've popped for younger actors to stand in for the characters. (I'm not sure why the character's sons couldn't have all stood in for their fathers as Henry's voice over told the tale. Only having Greg Beecroft portray the Reardon patriarch was strange. The fuzzy focus thing detracted from the story.) But it wasn't nearly as egregious as rewriting Billy, Josh, Ed and Alan's pasts. Buzz having had a new face could've been used, but was apparently forgotten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HB was from Tulsa, and there had been no indication in Josh's history that his father had ever set foot in Springfield. And yes, the Bauers were in Selby Flats, California until around 1966.  Plus, it's ludicrous to suggest that middle-class Bill Bauer was hanging around with three millionaires (HB, Henry, and Brandon) in the 1950s, regardless of their respective locations.  Additionally, it had already been established that none of those families had been acquainted until they all ended up in Springfield by the early 1980s.     

If you want to grasp for straws in order to believe that storyline, go ahead.  But I choose not to do that.    

But that is not storyline related.  Hiring a well known actress, even if she is a friend, does not over-ride the canon of the show.  And if it does, the entire show is booed, screwed, tattooed, and barbecued.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We had people going through paintings. A gum smacking cigarette girl. A fictional South American country with no real South American characters of note. We had Amish Reva. Wasting Marcy Walker for two years. We had what happened to Michael Zaslow bts and in the press.  If we're going to just stick with the Conboy Era, drug-dealing Alexandra is more offensive.  I don't think the Carrie Nye storyline was any more egregious or insulting to fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, that's not exactly accurate---it had been established that Henry knew Brandon and was a mentor of teenage Alan's since Henry arrived in town. Henry and HB's relationship had also been established, and in fact, HB had attended meetings at Spaulding (off-screen) as far back as 1981. It's part of the reason Josh arrived in town---to act as liason between Lewis and Spaulding.

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Barbara Rodell as the serene Leslie #2 (not counting Kathryn Hays' fill-in) and then as the deranged Joyce Colman on ATWT is night and day. What a talent. I'd forgotten she was the last Lee Randolph on AW too.

OTOH you can see why Lynne Adams was so popular as Leslie in the '66 Nixon episodes online - she is ethereal, whip-smart and very youthful, whereas she comes off considerably different in her return debut in '73.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Perfectly said.  I know people don't like the change (and there were too many) but Long had all the families in play, the Spauldings with their dysfunction, the Lewis with their rowdiness and crassness as contrast to...everyone else, the Bauers the center of it all and their Reardon's brining the blue collar warmth even as they argued as a big family does. New characters like Reva and Alex and India, etc. Then it all fell apart and it became a show about people in shoulder pads and big hair and a show that was kind of eccentric, all over the place, and warm, became a cold show, and a copy of...some other show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ya know I am of the opinion that at a certain point in soap history each show had its own unique identity & we definitely lost that & I think that was a huge mistake. When soaps began there was a great deal of similarity. So the excellent time I'm thinking of was a sweet spot. If only we could have maintained that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I stand corrected.  You are right, i guess the three millionaire men did have some history of knowing one another previously.  I had forgotten about all that.  So maybe this plot might have been believable to me, if only HB, Henry, and Brandon had been involved.  I still don't buy that the working-class Reardon father (was his name Tom?) would have been hanging around with three millionaires, unless he had been working for them.  Maybe as a fishing guide or something.  But as friends who would travel together, I just don't buy that.  And there is no way Bill Bauer would have fit into this group, for several reasons -- location being the most obvious.

Ultimately when discussing the Eli Simms plot or the Maryanne Curruthers plot, fans tend to decide whether or not they want to accept the historical inaccuracies, and then they look for reasons/evidence to either accept or not accept the storyline(s).  I fall on the side of not accepting it, so I find reasons the plot(s) doesn't work.  Those who want to accept it, look for reasons to do so.  That's totally okay with me.  

Putting all that aside, I did think the Eli Simms storyline was well conceived and well written. And it was a very interesting plot. Who ever thought of it (Pam Long?) was a very talented writer.  But I simply can't get beyond the rewrites of history it took to bring it to the air.  If other are able to get beyond that, then that's totally cool with me.  Just differences of opinion and perspective.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please don't misunderstand me. I hated the Eli Simms storyline because of its revisionist history and, yes, Bill Bauer was in Selby Flats in the 50s. However, Bill Bauer never actually moved to Springfield. Nor did any of the other characters. Selby Flats sort of just morphed into Springfield. It's as if the viewers were just supposed to believe that everything that happened previously on the show had happened in Springfield, not Selby Flats. The absurdist revisionism/dramatic license actually happened way back in the 60s. Historical accuracy had already left the building a long time before the Eli Simms story. Particularly in the realm of geography and setting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This can be difficult for a soap to depict. So far she's only shown an interest in women. Will a man come into her life? If she commits to a male, there will be  backlash, but if it's women only, them where is the bi/queer aspect? Personally, I would have liked a single gay male on the show dealing with hook ups/relationships etc. Smitty/Martin married with kids is limiting in those terms.
    • Of course, how could I have forgotten those thrilling episodes depicting the fire? Also we had the GCAC rooftop set that came out every Summer. Moving on to Friday's episode. Victor is propped in his chair, answers his cell and tells the caller 'Let him in'. Seconds later Kyle enters. So does Victor have security on the front porch? It would have been better had Victor taken the call, and then said to himself 'Well Kyle, let's see what you have to say'and fade out. Next scene Kyle enters, indicating that the first call was from the Ranch entrance and time had passed . Nit picky but I get frustrated when they do stuff like that.
    • Jordan was gone from '87 to mid-'89. He left just weeks after Robert's late '86 return.
    • Jordana Brewster is making a new movie. https://deadline.com/2025/06/rob-riggle-jordana-brewster-the-pirate-king-1236426287/ Kelly Rutherford posing for a magazine cover with her son. Kelly Rutherford Photographed with Model Son Hermés, 18, Years After Custody Battle  
    • I don't think Chelsea has a true label just yet. She's just finding out she has an interest in women. I think the awkwardness is aligned with the character as we've seen. This is the fool who keeps filming her family when embarrassing things happen and live streaming it. I actually think it's refreshing she isn't just jumping into a relationship  and that they're playing the beats of her trying to figure out who she is.
    • Wow, do I agree with you. Chelsea is coming off as ridiculous. All she does is look for a woman to date while not caring about her business at all. That she's bi is great, but they're not writing her like she's bi. She seems to be lesbian. Yeah, I know -- "no labels." I just don't find the writing for her story to be anything other than awkward.   -- I hope we get some diagnosis finality with Bill's trip to the hospital. I don't want to see these trips to the ER every other day. -- Naomi is going to blame herself for Bill's health problems? GMAB. -- Ashley doesn't read as a real nurse in the slightest. -- Another day, another rinse and repeat conversation with Derek and Ashley. YAWN. -- Kat is making mistakes, but she's fun to watch and listen to, regardless. -- I still think the Joey/Vanessa/Doug gambling story sucks. I know Doug is deeply in debt, but I don't like him acting this meek and submissive.  -- I'm not sure what Joey's plan was from the beginning, or why he had to seduce Vanessa at all to get his way. I'm not sure what Vanessa ever saw in Joey -- why doesn't he give her the ick? -- I'm fine with a story where Doug and Vanessa take out Joey.  -- The fades to commercials were pretty bad today.
    •   Victoria's house (that she long ago lived in with Billy) burned down (I think Aunt Jordan set it ablaze?). Victoria briefly moved into the ranch after the fire, with Claire, Johnny and Katie, I think? Mariah and Tessa and baby Aria had been living in the tack house but they bought a house we've never seen and moved there. Victoria, Claire, and Cole then moved into the tack house as soon as Teriah left. I guess Victoria's children Johnny and Katie would live with Victoria at the tack house eventually? But Johnny and Katie went to boarding school during the school year. Not sure if we'll see Johnny and Katie for the summer vacation or where they would live.
    • Victoria’s previous house burned down.    And I know why characters frequent Crimson Lights 3 times a day for brownies, muffins and empty mugs:   THERE’S PCP IN EVERYTHING. 
    • Today was a good episode, and the week for that matter. I think they've also done a better job with background music. The scenes in todays episode weren't as silent as they usually are in the background and it was noticeable. I think the show has found its groove well and I'm still invested. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy