Guiding Light Discussion Thread

[P.J.]

Making her Chrissie was inspired, but if they hadn't gotten Roger and Holly back, would it have meant as much?

Lord, save us from another Shayne. No offense to KdP, but she's just not my cup of tea. Maybe she just upped her game for OLTL, but she's uninspired on GL.

Well, you can't have a "bad" Reardon. They could've said Chelsea was the oldest child of the oldest Reardon. 

Edited 4 hours ago by P.J.

[DRW50]

I think Kassie was a decent enough support figure on GL but probably not able to play complexity (most of the ingenues who came and went on GL couldn't), although they didn't really give her any either. She once said that they gave Blake everything that had once been there for Chelsea. She does better on OLTL but that took a while too.

[P.J.]

I guess in terms of Phillip's woman du jour coming in third behind Beth and Spaulding, that's true. But she sure wasn't either MKA or even Liz Dennehy.

Was Bolger still in the role at the beginning of Phillip/Chelsea?

Edited 2 hours ago by P.J.

[DRW50]

I think Grant had just returned, although I'm not sure.

I can't remember the exact quote, but I think Kassie said Blake took her storyline, her romantic pairing, and her job (at Spaulding). I can't remember when this was - maybe her leaving interview in SOD or SPW. 

[DeeVee]

I recall a scene between Phillip and Chelsea that was played with Bolger--I think it was the characters' first major conversation--but soon after that Grant returned. 

Chelsea working in PR at Spaulding made little sense. At least Blake was supposed to be qualified. Never understood why Alan was willing to give Chelsea that job. He seemed to really like Chelsea as Phillip's girlfriend, too, which made less sense, as she was even lower on the social scale than Beth.

Wait...

Just thought of something.

Took her storyline? 

Was CHELSEA originally supposed to be Alan's spy to help him get Spaulding back? Were they going to become lovers?

Is THAT what Maureen meant about her being "wild?"

Yikes.