Jump to content

Guiding Light Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

lol...me too. No one got under Van's skin like Nola.

As a reliable source of info, no Fletcher didn't annoy me. Although I'd classify him as familiar rather than a "comforting" presence. It's when they pushed him into a romance that set my teeth on edge. Fletch got "yelly" and presumptuous when he got involved. He's downright clingy and self-righteous with Vanessa, although I do recognize that part of that is that deep in his soul he knows Vanessa's just not that into him. No matter what she says.

 

It's also one of Jane Elliot's first appearances as Carrie. And there's a scene with Henry and Vanessa, where they discuss she's being blackmailed, which I didn't realize that he knew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What do you all think of Marcy as a Mindy recast at that time?

You should watch Signy's interview on the Locher Room and hear what she said about him! Strangely, Locher, ever the P&G PR man, let her talk and didn't edit the conversation. Now, I'm a huge Lujack fan and AMC'S David Hayward fan, but she swayed me from being a VI fan.

Please register in order to view this content

 


"Where is the son that you ever gave him?" Yikes! Who talks like that? Yes, I frequent Datalounge...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I'd have to agree with whoever suggested Marcy Walker for Emily Mason Norris.  I think she would've been terrific as Holly's niece and Blake's cousin (given the right writing, of course).  But you're not gonna like who I would've paired her with. 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, I will have to make time to squeeze that in, but I will do so. However, VI did me a big favor when I was running a very serious campaign to try to get a Posthumous Emmy for Beverlee McKinsey & I am inclined in favor of him as a person as a result of that very positive contact, but, sure, we'll see. Thanks for the heads up. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No problem. I mean, I don't want to demonize someone I don't know. I'm just offering another perspective. Judi (Evans, ex-Beth) seems to think very highly of him, and she has been candid about her off-screen issues with others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Mindy was beneath her talents, to be honest (and I am a Mindy fan). Still, it would have been more logical than what they did with Tangie.

@P.J. Thanks. I think I watched the episode a few years ago, but that one moment is still visceral in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I swear I remember Bea walking through the doors to Ed's patio and announcing to Nola that she'd told Kelly during the Kelly/Nola confrontation, but I was completely wrong! 

It's nice to have the entire episode up. I can't recall having seen the Bea/Nola part up anywhere. I'm not sure even the Quola fans had that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, it should be said that Kimberley Simms gave Mindy much more depth after taking over from Krista (Tesreau, ex-Mindy), and matured the character. I can see Marcy as the next step in that progression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The early 1980s was peak ABC big three and that was reflected in the Daytime Emmy nominations.

Lisa Brown got nominated twice for As the World Turns, 1987 and 1988 Supporting Actress.

Krista Tesreau original recipe Mindy came across as a spoiled brat/daddy's little princess. Kimberley Simms took Mindy to a whole other level. Kimberley Simms Mindy initially had some remnants of spoiled brat/daddy's little princess but then Mindy grew up and matured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unpopular opinion, but I think the show should have rested Mindy as a character after Simms left the show in mid 1992. Her character hardly contributed to the show when she was recast between 1993 and 1995 so it would have been better to have brought her back later on when either Simms or Krista were available to come back. 

Also, if they had managed to get Krista to come back later on... I would have paired her Mindy with Frank.. since the two had chemistry during their brief dalliance in 1988 during the writer strike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy